Originally Posted by moox:
“The bit being quoted says 2G coverage. Maybe I'm missing something but 3 would not appear here because they have no 2G coverage?”
“The bit being quoted says 2G coverage. Maybe I'm missing something but 3 would not appear here because they have no 2G coverage?”
Bingo! Exactly my point. The reporter makes a statement that OFCOM didn't supply something that doesn't exist (2G on Three).
I would have expected a tech writer for the BBC to be slightly clued up to the networks.



