Originally Posted by FrankieFixer:
“They couldn't prove it and they knew they couldn't.”
“They couldn't prove it and they knew they couldn't.”
You emboldened the wrong part.
Quote:
““He did not therefore have the necessary criminal state of mind required for a criminal prosecution."”
““He did not therefore have the necessary criminal state of mind required for a criminal prosecution."”
They cannot and never were going to prosecute under criminal law.
Originally Posted by Evo102:
“I assumed you understood that the DVLA can only prosecute in respect of licencing offences and not road traffic accidents?”
“I assumed you understood that the DVLA can only prosecute in respect of licencing offences and not road traffic accidents?”
Where have i stated about being prosecuted for a road traffic accident? Nice try at twisting words around but it hasn't worked.
I posted a quote taken from a DVLA website. Not my words or opinion. Theirs.
Originally Posted by davidmcn:
“It's been decades since there's been a prosecution in Scotland run by anyone other than the Crown Office (and I think they need the consent of the Crown Office to do so), so I really doubt that there's going to be a prosecution by either the DVLA or the families.”
“It's been decades since there's been a prosecution in Scotland run by anyone other than the Crown Office (and I think they need the consent of the Crown Office to do so), so I really doubt that there's going to be a prosecution by either the DVLA or the families.”
The DVLA is the licencing authority throughout Great Britain. Scotland and it's citizens don't have any kind of special exemption clause when it comes to the DVLA prosecuting licence holders.



