DS Forums

 
 

How would you react to a female Doctor?


View Poll Results: How would you react to a female Doctor?
I would not watch any new Doctor Who with a female Doctor 42 28.97%
I don't like the idea of a female Doctor, but I'd give it a chance 44 30.34%
No problem with a female Doctor, but it would depend on the actress and scripts 59 40.69%
Voters: 145. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25-12-2014, 23:31
PaperSkin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,076
Quite right. I have nothing against females or males within roles in normal day to day life. Just not a female doctor.
If the doctor were to regenerate to female how would it explain him being a father & grandfather. A female doctor would not work. This show has worked successfully for 51 years. Why change it just to please a few minority from the PC brigade.
Father and Grandfathers can change gender now, they are still a father or grandfather they just a different gender to what they use to be.

Could you say why a female Doctor wouldn't work? How would this stop stories from being entertaining
PaperSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 25-12-2014, 23:37
CELT1987
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 10,241
Sorry I didn't fully explain myself, I don't mean to paint everyone who doesn't want a female Doctor with the same brush, I just meant that if it upsets people who are sexist, and that why they are against it, then I don't think that such a bad thing.

I don't think that everyone who doesn't want a female Doctor is sexist, not at all, I can understand for example the idea that the Doctor is a great male role model, and being a slender 20 something male whose not big on the whole lad culture thing the doctor is certainly someone I prefer males to be portrayed like and would rather be like him than action types (screw you bond though I do enjoy some of those films too, except QOS that terrible, anyway) so I can understand if people want the Doctor figure to stay the way its been.

I have no great urge for the Doctor to change gender its just if they did go down that route I would happily go along with it, I'm not fussed either way.
I can see where you are coming from now. I'm not totally against a female Doctor, but would still rather it was male. However,
It would take a fantastic female actor to get the part. The right actor and a female Doctor might work.
CELT1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-12-2014, 23:45
PaperSkin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,076
I can see where you are coming from now. I'm not totally against a female Doctor, but would still rather it was male. However,
It would take a fantastic female actor to get the part. The right actor and a female Doctor might work.
Definitely, it would take someone really special, to live up the excellent actors that have previously played the Doctor but also to win people over. If a women does come along who would be brilliant in the role then I do think the producers should go for it.
PaperSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-12-2014, 00:03
CBFreak
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,063
She might be too big a name for the role should a Female Doctor be cast but I can see Tilda Swinton play the Doctor.
This also means I have no real issue with it. The best actor for the role and the fantastic thing about the Doctor as a character is that it's not having to be limited to one gender.
CBFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-12-2014, 00:12
Old Man 43
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,583
I have no problem with this as long as they come up with a good story about why this would happen and they got a very good actress to play the part. Also the producers would have to make sure that all the stories for the 1st season after the change were of the highest quality in both writing and execution.

My reason for the Doctor changing to female would be as a disguise.

The scenario that I have thought of is that the Doctor discovers that Gallifrey has been captured by Missy/The Master with the help of a rogue (now) Time Agency (Captain Jack's former employers from the 51st Century).

The Doctor realises that the only way to help his people is to regenerate into a young female form and pretend to be the Doctor's companion with someone (older male) pretending to be the Doctor.

After a season of adventures with the female Doctor the TARDIS finds itself on Gallifrey at which point the Doctor enacts a plan to free his people from the rule of Missy/The Master.

Now that would be a good story.
Old Man 43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-12-2014, 10:18
chattswho
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 191
Father and Grandfathers can change gender now, they are still a father or grandfather they just a different gender to what they use to be.

Could you say why a female Doctor wouldn't work? How would this stop stories from being entertaining
Yes - fair point paperskin & i suppose it would take on a new twist to the doctors character if a sex change regeneration where to occur, in much the same way as a real father/grandfather changed sex & had to explain to his/her family for the change. Once again, fair point. But IMO the doctor has always been male - with that typical doctoresque character/persona he has always possessed. Why change a winning formula that has worked SO well for 51 years just to please a small minority from the PC brigade.

What would be funny if when the time comes for capaldi to regenerate, his regeneration goes slightly wrong & he regenerates into female says something like "Ooh thats not meant to happen." All the dr who fans go "Ahhhhhhh!" for a split second before the real regeneration occurs & the doctor says something on the lines of "Ah now thats more like it" - gets hold of a mirror then says "At least im not ginger'
& that is with all due respect to people with ginger hair. That would be a typical moffat type thing he would do to get the fans going.
chattswho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-12-2014, 10:26
GDK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wigan
Posts: 4,881
With 71 votes cast currently, it looks like a little under 25% say they'd stop watching Doctor Who if the Doctor became female; a little under half either positive or not affected either way; and the remainder not liking the idea but at least prepared to give it a try.

In my book that's 3:1 (75:25) are open minded about it.
GDK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-12-2014, 12:54
lady_xanax
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,042
There's a difference between sex and gender. If the Doctor changed sex but not gender, no doubt the writer would add hilarious sexist jokes but there's less grounds for complaint. We would be objecting because it didn't look right.

Gender is part of identity, hence why some people have a sex change so the gender matches the sex. The Doctor has been a masculine role; to start playing it as a feminine role would be too jarring.

Although Bond doesn't regenerate, he has had six different faces, different personalities and has been a variety of ages yet still roughly the same age after sixty years. So essentially he isjust a name.
lady_xanax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-12-2014, 21:27
GDK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wigan
Posts: 4,881
With 71 votes cast currently, it looks like a little under 25% say they'd stop watching Doctor Who if the Doctor became female; a little under half either positive or not affected either way; and the remainder not liking the idea but at least prepared to give it a try.

In my book that's 3:1 (75:25) are open minded about it.
84 votes and still 3:1 in favour of those who'd give it a chance or aren't upset. Looks like it's settling out that way.
GDK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-12-2014, 09:19
jcafcw
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,439
I have no problem with a female Doctor.

But then I haven't got a personality disorder.
jcafcw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-12-2014, 09:46
Torry_Z
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 946
There's a difference between sex and gender. If the Doctor changed sex but not gender, no doubt the writer would add hilarious sexist jokes but there's less grounds for complaint. We would be objecting because it didn't look right.

Gender is part of identity, hence why some people have a sex change so the gender matches the sex. The Doctor has been a masculine role; to start playing it as a feminine role would be too jarring.

Although Bond doesn't regenerate, he has had six different faces, different personalities and has been a variety of ages yet still roughly the same age after sixty years. So essentially he isjust a name.
I'm not saying you're wrong but what exactly marks him it as ''masculine" apart from his appearance...
Torry_Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-12-2014, 20:41
lady_xanax
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,042
I'm not saying you're wrong but what exactly marks him it as ''masculine" apart from his appearance...
Emphasising the fact that either women or men could have these characteristics, qualities such as dominance, assertiveness, courageousness, prizing logic above emotion are stereotypically 'masculine' qualities. With the new series adding the possibility of romance, we can add virility to the list. The latter quality is less pronounced in Twelve but no doubt he'll be given someone age appropriate to flirt with.
lady_xanax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-12-2014, 10:35
Theophile
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,831
Id firstly stop watching the show altogether and secondly get all my dr who merch and burn the entire lot and have nothing to do with the show ever again!
Yeah, this is pretty much my sentiment right here.
Theophile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-12-2014, 11:26
servelan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 191
I don't understand why some people would be so against a female Doctor? Personally, I am happy with the idea as long as it is the right actress. Someone older with a bit of gravitas. The Doctor has never seemed to me to be male or female
servelan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 09:40
GDK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wigan
Posts: 4,881
84 votes and still 3:1 in favour of those who'd give it a chance or aren't upset. Looks like it's settling out that way.
91 votes cast and 73:27 (%). A slight change but still almost 3:1 in favour of the open minded.
GDK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 11:22
andy1231
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,464
I can't think of a single good reason why they would regenerate The Doctor into a woman, other than for shock reasons Just as they did with The Master/Missy. There was no reason why that transformation took place either, other than because Moffatt could do it.
andy1231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2015, 00:22
Vopiscus
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Probably not Syracuse
Posts: 710
91 votes cast and 73:27 (%). A slight change but still almost 3:1 in favour of the open minded.
I don't know why the previous poll was "invalid and beyond correction", but I can see problems with this one. With 102 votes in, we have 26.47% who would not watch any new Doctor Who with a female Doctor, 35.29% who don't like the idea of a female Doctor, but would "give it a chance", and 38.24% who have "no problem" with a female Doctor, but nonetheless think this would "depend on the actress and the scripts". We can thus, depending on our inclinations, claim that well over half (61.76%) don't like the idea of a female Doctor, or that nearly three-quarters (73.53%) would be prepared to watch but with reservations at least one episode with a female Doctor. [There is no option for unqualified support for a female Doctor. Why?]

Since at no point in the poll has anyone been asked "Are you in favour of being open minded (about this)?" the gathered evidence offers no support for the assertion that opinion is "3:1 in favour of the open minded". I don't mind (in fact, I quite enjoy) polls like this on the forum, but, to be effective, they need to be carefully worded and the results scrupulously assessed.
Vopiscus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2015, 01:36
GDK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wigan
Posts: 4,881
The other poll originally had the opposite question to the headline leading many to vote the wrong way, the opposite of their intention. This was pointed out, the question corrected by the mods but it was not reset and zeroed to allow people to recast their vote, so it is and remains invalid. This is all clear if you read the earlier posts in that thread.

My comments in this poll are carefully worded and the question in this poll is not leading in any way. If you're at least willing to give it a try with a female Doctor then, almost by definition, you are open minded on this question. I don't see any problem with that. It's a logical inference.

I'm sorry if you're irritated at me for having to vote again, but your irritation is misdirected.
GDK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2015, 09:53
Torry_Z
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 946
I'm one of those who watches DW regardless of the actor playing the Doctor. Hell I don't even really have a favourite... So if the actor were female it wouldn't bother me at all...
Torry_Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2015, 07:59
nyder
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 888
I would not watch if the Doctor became a woman. Not because I am sexist, I am not, but for various personal reasons of how I view the character.

But here is a purely logical/mathematical reason for not doing it:-

According to the poll at the moment 27.8% would no longer watch, 35.19% do not want it but would watch at least one episode to 'give it a chance'. It would be a reasonable assumption that it would be a strong possibility that half of this second group would no longer watch after the first episode as they are biased against it anyway. That would mean that 45.4% would no longer watch the programme.

If the poll was representative of the general Dr Who audience (I actually suspect the number would be higher as the general audience is made up of a large number of casual viewers who would think "sod that") that would mean that the programme would lose 45% of it's viewing figures overnight. Viewing figures would be barely above 3 million and therefore devastating. Therefore, regardless of your personal views on the gender of the Doctor you should ask yourself if you want to see the programme have it's viewing figures destroyed and risk cancellation.

Calling us names because of our views of a television character does not change the maths.
nyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2015, 09:09
nate1970
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,555
I have no problem with a female Doctor.

But then I haven't got a personality disorder.
*sigh* Go on then, I'll bite.

Why does not wanting one of the fundamental (I'm purposefully not going to say 'defining') characteristics of a much-beloved fictional character to change, mean that someone has a personality disorder?
nate1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2015, 09:20
johnnysaucepn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,651
Since at no point in the poll has anyone been asked "Are you in favour of being open minded (about this)?" the gathered evidence offers no support for the assertion that opinion is "3:1 in favour of the open minded". I don't mind (in fact, I quite enjoy) polls like this on the forum, but, to be effective, they need to be carefully worded and the results scrupulously assessed.
I'm not sure what you mean when you think of open-mindedness - but certainly 'watching it regardless of the change' and 'giving it a chance' both fit under the definition for me.
johnnysaucepn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2015, 11:14
Antimon_Bush
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 897
It's interesting how female-doctor-supporters are trying to usurp this second group who DON'T like the idea of a female Doctor, but they would "give it a chance". Those people DON'T like the idea! They would keep watching just because it's their favourite TV show and they don't want to stop watching just because of this nonsense. So stop counting this group as they are supporters of the idea because they are NOT!

Also, stop calling us names just because we think that gender is very important part of Doctor's identity. We se him as a male character and that's it. It's not sexist because we are not denying that women can be great superheroes, we just oppose gender changes.
Also, just because some people don't see the importance of gender, it doesn't mean that they are "open-minded". I would personally call them nihilists but I don't want to be unfair by calling them names (like they are offending us by calling us "sexist" and calling supporters "open minded").
Antimon_Bush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2015, 11:27
Theophile
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,831
It's interesting how female-doctor-supporters are trying to usurp this second group who DON'T like the idea of a female Doctor, but they would "give it a chance". Those people DON'T like the idea! They would keep watching just because it's their favourite TV show and they don't want to stop watching just because of this nonsense. So stop counting this group as they are supporters of the idea because they are NOT!

Also, stop calling us names just because we think that gender is very important part of Doctor's identity. We se him as a male character and that's it. It's not sexist because we are not denying that women can be great superheroes, we just oppose gender changes.
Also, just because some people don't see the importance of gender, it doesn't mean that they are "open-minded". I would personally call them nihilists but I don't want to be unfair by calling them names (like they are offending us by calling us "sexist" and calling supporters "open minded").
Amen, amen and amen.

With over 100 people replying to this poll, over two-thirds don't want a female doctor with about 30% of the people who will automatically quit watching the show. Throw into that the fact that the second third will still probably stop watching it and you have a show killer.

The vast majority of people do not want The Doctor to become a woman. If you want a female Time Lord (Lady?) to whom to idolize, then lobby for a spin-off with The Doctor's Daughter, The Rani, Romana or a new character. However, leave The Doctor alone. Just because something can theoretically be done, doesn't mean that it should be done. This is one of those things that should not be done.
Theophile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2015, 12:15
johnnysaucepn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,651
It's interesting how female-doctor-supporters are trying to usurp this second group who DON'T like the idea of a female Doctor, but they would "give it a chance". Those people DON'T like the idea! They would keep watching just because it's their favourite TV show and they don't want to stop watching just because of this nonsense. So stop counting this group as they are supporters of the idea because they are NOT!
Nobody is counting them as supporters of anything. You probably want to re-read that. They are viewers that would be willing to give the idea a chance to prove itself. Being open-minded enough to consider yourself willing to re-evaluate your position is a win for everyone.

Also, stop calling us names just because we think that gender is very important part of Doctor's identity. We se him as a male character and that's it. It's not sexist because we are not denying that women can be great superheroes, we just oppose gender changes.
Which is the part that's interesting. How do you feel about real-life cases of humans changing gender?

Also, just because some people don't see the importance of gender, it doesn't mean that they are "open-minded". I would personally call them nihilists but I don't want to be unfair by calling them names (like they are offending us by calling us "sexist" and calling supporters "open minded").
I think you also have an odd idea of what 'open minded' means. Believing that gender doesn't limit personality isn't a case of open-mindedness - being wiling to be swayed by strong evidence to the contrary is. I could only call myself open-minded, for example, if you were able to provide evidence that gender produces a barrier to identity and personality that cannot be crossed - that men and women are fundamentally different beyond reproductive organs.
johnnysaucepn is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:09.