DS Forums

 
 

Katy Perry to dis Taylor Swift during Superbowl


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-01-2015, 14:45
Derek Faye
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,024

It’s no secret that Katy Perry, 30, and Taylor Swift, 25, have one of the biggest ongoing feuds in Hollywood. Now that Taylor has taken over the music scene with huge success from 1989, Katy wants to “show she is the biggest female act,” while performing at the 2015 Super Bowl. HollywoodLife.com can EXCLUSIVELY reveal what Katy has up her sleeve!



“Katy is in complete rehearsal mode for her Super Bowl performance, she wants to make it feel like a complete party and something that will be remembered forever”



“She wants to make a statement with her performance and show that she is the biggest female act in the world and she wants to show that to everyone including Taylor, who she has a feud with. In Katy’s eyes, no one can compete on her level,” our source continues.



“Katy will be doing something on stage during her performance that will be directed towards Taylor. She is working on it to be a visual or a lyric related jab".
http://hollywoodlife.com/2015/01/03/...l-performance/

All I can say is, how sad if this is true. Why waste this opportunity like this
Derek Faye is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 04-01-2015, 14:45
Rob1985
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,226
How childish, if true.
Rob1985 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 14:48
little-monster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 30,200
I would hardly call it one of the biggest ongoing fueds in hollywood


Especially as it has all been one sided from Taylor's part, and the fued is all speculation based one song Taylor did.
little-monster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 15:55
Los_Tributos
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 720
If previous form is anything to go by, she'd be best off focusing on her live vocals.
Los_Tributos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 15:58
boysforpele
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,585
omg i didn't realise that she was doing the Super Bowl this year ....

wow

i doubt that she would diss taylor this way....
boysforpele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 16:07
trevvytrev21
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 15,867
Katy needs to grow up.
trevvytrev21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 16:16
cris182
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 4,839
If previous form is anything to go by, she'd be best off focusing on her live vocals.
That is the clever thing though....She will get slated for sounding awful live. But one 'dig' at Taylor Swift and that will be all anyone remembers

No dig....Criticism

Dig.....Publicity
cris182 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 16:48
rbautz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,149
If previous form is anything to go by, she'd be best off focusing on her live vocals.
There are no live vocals on Superbowl, never was, never will be.

So, she should better invest in the sound mixing.
rbautz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 16:58
d56
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 5,390
IF true (and that's a big if, coming from that source) then it's pathetic.

I think Katy is treading on dangerous territory too. Taylor's career is going from strength to strength and she's befriending so many people in the industry (Jay Z, Beyonce and Justin Timberlake were all recently at her birthday party). The more Katy disses her or does these pathetic spiteful acts (trying to sabotage her tour etc) then the more enemies she will make imo.

Also, again IF true, Katy should spend more time practising her live vocals and dance moves. She isn't exactly the most talented person out there.
d56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 17:05
RoseAnne
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lytham St Annes
Posts: 2,366
If she really is the biggest female act in the world then she shouldn't need to diss anyone else. Also, she isn't a good role model to her fans by being bitchy. Yep, Taylor is no stranger to this either, but Katy would come out of it really well if she said that the more singer/songwriter female artists in the chart the better. No chance of her doing that though.
RoseAnne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 17:51
trevvytrev21
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 15,867
Katy gets others to do her dirty work for her. Didn't her boyfriend and brother both tweet negative things about Taylor very close to release week of 1989?

I can see why she is upset. Taylor has taken her sound into pure pop territory and beaten Katy at her own game.
trevvytrev21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 18:19
Los_Tributos
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 720
There are no live vocals on Superbowl, never was, never will be.
Err yes there are.
Los_Tributos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 18:21
dearmrman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Utopia
Posts: 10,192
But probably not from Katy
dearmrman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 18:23
trevvytrev21
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 15,867
Hasn't been live for quite a while though. No-one would criticise Katy for miming in this instance.
trevvytrev21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 18:44
rbautz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,149
Hasn't been live for quite a while though. No-one would criticise Katy for miming in this instance.
I don't believe that if they don't play live today that they would have played live 20 years ago.

It's not like, the music equipment was better 20 years ago.
rbautz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 18:45
Los_Tributos
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 720
Hasn't been live for quite a while though.
Well since last year at least when both Bruno Mars and Anthony Kiedis sang live.
Los_Tributos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 18:50
Dizagaox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,417
Microphones are live. Instruments aren't.
Dizagaox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 19:10
rbautz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,149
Microphones are live. Instruments aren't.

Superbowl is so much more worth than a music performance at them.

Superbowl is obligated to deliver a pefrect show and not an artistic milestone.

The voice is pre-recorded and if there is a micro open for banter with the crowd, why not.

Superbowl sells us an perfect illusion and the performer who pays for the performance, with his own money, a promo opportunity, simple as that.
rbautz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 19:12
FMKK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,181
Superbowl is so much more worth than a music performance at them.

Superbowl is obligated to deliver a perect show and not an artistic milestone.

The voice is pre-recorded and if there is a micro open for banter with the crowd, why not.

Superbowl sells us an perfect illusion and the performer who pays for the performance, with his own money, a promo opportunity, simple as that.
Pretty sure the Stones, McCartney etc. all played live for their Superbowl gigs within the last ten years and these are men who are pensioners. Surely much younger popstars who are in their prime should be held to the same standards.
FMKK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 19:22
rbautz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,149
Pretty sure the Stones, McCartney etc. all played live for their Superbowl gigs within the last ten years and these are men who are pensioners. Surely much younger popstars who are in their prime should be held to the same standards.
Lol, the Stones are commerial as it can gets and McCartneys voice isn't live the best (have you heard him at the Grammys?) so he will felt a relief to mime.

The Who didn't play live, it was discussed at that time and they also didn't play live at the Olympic opening.
rbautz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 19:24
dearmrman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Utopia
Posts: 10,192
Superbowl is so much more worth than a music performance at them.

Superbowl is obligated to deliver a pefrect show and not an artistic milestone.

The voice is pre-recorded and if there is a micro open for banter with the crowd, why not.

Superbowl sells us an perfect illusion and the performer who pays for the performance, with his own money, a promo opportunity, simple as that.
I suggest you go back and watch a few...not all artists performing are pre-recorded. Prince vocals certainly weren't.
dearmrman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 19:25
rbautz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,149
I suggest you go back and watch a few...not all artists performing are pre-recorded. Prince vocals certainly weren't.
Your location is Utopia, nevermind.

We are here in the music forum and some of you think, music is everything, it's not.
rbautz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 19:27
FMKK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,181
Lol, the Stones are commerial as it can gets and McCartneys voice isn't live the best (have you heard him at the Grammys?) so he will felt a relief to mime.

The Who didn't play live, it was discussed at that time and they also didn't play live at the Olympic opening.
What has that got to do with anything? Obviously commercial acts are going to be picked for the biggest TV gig in America. They still sang and played live. McCartney's voice has certainly weakened with age but at least it has declined from a point of being good rather than it always being crap like Katy's.

I would much rather see a proper live performance that's a little raw or rough around the edges than something super stage-managed and mimed.

Did Bruno Mars sing live last year? Probably.
FMKK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 19:32
dearmrman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Utopia
Posts: 10,192
Your location is Utopia, nevermind.

We are here in the music forum and some of you think, music is everything, it's not.
Well yes it's a music forum...if it's not music then it should be moved to showbiz.
dearmrman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 19:34
FMKK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,181
Well yes it's a music forum...if it's not music then it should be moved to showbiz.
A lot of the time it just seems to be a pop stars/stan wars/whinging about the Saturday's management forum.
FMKK is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:50.