|
||||||||
Nu-Who is 10 years old, this year! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: 100 Acre Wood
Posts: 4,110
|
Nu-Who is 10 years old, this year!
In March, it will be excactly 10 years since we saw Christopher Eccleston in the Tardis with Billie Piper.
Just wondering if there is anything special planned? Like any merchandise, perhaps? Or a special programme to profile the last ten years? ![]() I think there will be something on the BBC News about this, but other than that I am not sure. Anyone know any more details?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Wilderness
Posts: 13,088
|
Just statements from RTD & Moffat both saying it would be silly to celebrate "the 10th" after "the 50th" so I'm not expecting much
![]() But with Mr. Misdirect in charge, I should never say never. There may well be something to note it. Talking heads and all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 3,703
|
Quote:
Just statements from RTD & Moffat both saying it would be silly to celebrate "the 10th" after "the 50th" so I'm not expecting much
![]() But with Mr. Misdirect in charge, I should never say never. There may well be something to note it. Talking heads and all. Oh.... hang on a minute...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,355
|
As someone who grew up in the 90's and never really discovered doctor who until 2005, it seems strange to me to think that there are now 10 year old kids in the world for whom doctor who has always been on their entire lives.
Then again, older people born from mid 1960's to 80's would have had the same sort of experience, so I suppose it is me and my generation who are the odd one's out in not getting to experience having it on in our childhood. Sometimes it feels as though that means I missed out not getting to see it as a kid, but at other times I think that I may not have gotten involved with a show that was already years old, and would likely have been of really bad quality had it still been on then, since it already is said to have been in 89' hence it's cancellation so I often mostly think that I am glad that it was presented to me as a new show in 2005 with the back story gradually drip fed, as I may have missed out on the show altogether. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mid Wales
Posts: 547
|
Quote:
I think there will be something on the BBC News about this. :0
What might be nice would be an allegorical episode where part of the plot involves an institution, civilisation or ideal (or, something less grandiose, such as a band), once beloved but now neglected, given a triumphant return, only for it to sore to new heights. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 7,096
|
Back in my old days (harrumph!) - Jon Pertwee was celebrating 10 years of Doctor Who with the reunion of The Three Doctors. Jolly romp it was too!!
But nowadays - it is just classed as a continuation of that era. We've had the 50th - and I think that's all we'll get for now! Quite rightly so!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,360
|
Quote:
As someone who grew up in the 90's and never really discovered doctor who until 2005, it seems strange to me to think that there are now 10 year old kids in the world for whom doctor who has always been on their entire lives.
* "They were younger than us." "What?" "That couple. They were younger than us." "Only physically" |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,357
|
Where did all those years go!?
An Easter special would've been nice for the anniversary. Nothing too big and no past Doctors just an ordinary episode. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,464
|
Should be an ideal opportunity to bring back some characters and baddies we haven't seen for a while. It is also Captain Jacks anniversary too. So he would be top of my list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
|
Quote:
Should be an ideal opportunity to bring back some characters and baddies we haven't seen for a while. It is also Captain Jacks anniversary too. So he would be top of my list.
I understand he wanted a clean slate for his first season (or two) but it would be nice if he started to include or revisit some of the RTD era characters now his era is so established. There are sixteen year old fans who's early memories of Who are Doctor 9 and Rose. I think that's lovely and it would be nice to acknowledge that on screen. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,651
|
Quote:
I understand he wanted a clean slate for his first season (or two) but it would be nice if he started to include or revisit some of the RTD era characters now his era is so established.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 550
|
Quote:
Surely it was more a case of cast and crew all moving on at the end of an era, rather than being excluded at the beginning of one?
EDIT: (Something I posted in the Dalek thread accidentally) It would be interesting if they filmed an extra episode in secret. Might explain the 12 episode count. Honestly though, just a short episode would do me. Something like Night of the Doctor. A short, interesting event, with a little fan service. Maybe just visiting an old companion or something. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,355
|
Quote:
Yes, it could be a low level celebration - Captain Jack, maybe Martha too. It did feel (a little bit) like a wall came down on the first five years of new Who when Steven Moffat took over.
I understand he wanted a clean slate for his first season (or two) but it would be nice if he started to include or revisit some of the RTD era characters now his era is so established. There are sixteen year old fans who's early memories of Who are Doctor 9 and Rose. I think that's lovely and it would be nice to acknowledge that on screen. Other RTD era faces would be more than welcome too. Rose and Donna can come back any time and for any length of time in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
|
Quote:
Surely it was more a case of cast and crew all moving on at the end of an era, rather than being excluded at the beginning of one?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Wilderness
Posts: 13,088
|
...and he probably would have been if it hadn't been for that meddling Miracle Day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hull, UK
Posts: 7,363
|
^Yeah, how ironic - he couldn't play Jack because he was already playing Jack in another production! What a lack of coordination!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:09.

Just wondering if there is anything special planned? Like any merchandise, perhaps?
Or a special programme to profile the last ten years? 
