|
||||||||
Madonna - Queen of the Charts? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,709
|
Madonna - Queen of the Charts?
Madonna was Queen of the Charts between 1984-2009 since 2009 she has not had a top 10 hit with only one song since 2010 reaching the top 40.
Is it a fact that having a top 10 hit is now irrelevant? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Utopia
Posts: 10,192
|
For the length of career she has had and for her fans, then yes the charts should be totally irrelevant. Sadly some people only look at chart positions as a measure of an artist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,709
|
Quote:
For the length of career she has had and for her fans, then yes the charts should be totally irrelevant. Sadly some people only look at chart positions as a measure of an artist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Utopia
Posts: 10,192
|
Quote:
The charts are pretty irrelevant these days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 30,200
|
Longevity is what is relevant imo
Not sales and chart positions. But many think they are. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 477
|
Just look at her touring data, she's still pretty much untouchable among pop acts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Herr Flick's dungeon
Posts: 5,939
|
Quote:
Madonna was Queen of the Charts between 1984-2009 since 2009 she has not had a top 10 hit with only one song since 2010 reaching the top 40.
Is it a fact that having a top 10 hit is now irrelevant? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,744
|
Quote:
Just look at her touring data, she's still pretty much untouchable among pop acts.
A bit like The Rolling Stones and Cher who continue to have sell out tours all over the world (most of them tend to be America I think?) but they've not had a hit in the charts for years. They've built up a legacy, and Madonna is following suit. Music consumption has changed dramatically over the last 30 years. With streaming now becoming the norm rather than downloading, this is only to further change the way people get their music. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Docklands, London
Posts: 2,257
|
i think it means she has become a 'heritage' act - much like the Rolling Stones and Cher. Not relevant in todays music world - but still very popular in terms of greatest hits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,436
|
Quote:
i think it means she has become a 'heritage' act - much like the Rolling Stones and Cher. Not relevant in todays music world - but still very popular in terms of greatest hits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Utopia
Posts: 10,192
|
Quote:
She may not have #1 hits anymore, but quite a few people are interested in her new songs and new album, certainly more than the Rolling Stones and Cher. There's been quite a lot of discussion of her 6 new songs on various blogs and articles and also of the demos that leaked. The fact that someone bothered to leak the demos shows that people are still interested in what she will do next. No one leaks Rolling Stones or Cher demos because no one cares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,473
|
She's the most successful female artist of all time globally, she still provokes discussion so she is relevant. Whatever happens in the future she will be remembered as a massive part of the history of pop music. I have mixed opinions on her music but I think she's handled the fame and her career well, when you consider how many of her contemporaries have fallen or had personal problems she has kept herself together. I think she's definitely a tough and ruthless woman, but she's never really tried to hide it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,436
|
Quote:
That's mighty presumptuous of you....maybe the don't leak anything, because they are not bothered about trying to keep relevant and don't need to prove anything to anyone, whereas some artists are just media whores and are afraid of becoming irrelevant.
I think there's a middle ground. Yes, Madonna may not be having Top 10 singles, but there is interest in her albums and hearing some new material from her. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,174
|
Shouldn't the title 'Queen of Pop' be very subjective based on who's at the very top of their game at the minute? After all pop music is very transient and the height of pop is what's right now.
Right now I would say Queen of Pop would have to go to Taylor Swift but next month or year that could and probably will change. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Utopia
Posts: 10,192
|
Quote:
Madonna didn't leak the demos. Someone got access to them and leaked them. But they wouldn't have done that, if they didn't think people were interested. I don't understand the term "media whore". If you are in the entertainment business, it is part of your job to do publicity and speak to the media, to promote your work. The Rolling Stones and Cher do interviews all the time. Everyone in the music business likes attention to a certain extent. If you are working hard to do something, why wouldn't you want people to know about it? Maybe Madonna likes creating new material. It keeps her interested in life and vibrant. I don't think it's about proving anything to anyone. I like hearing some older songs but I find artists that do endless greatest hits tours with no new material quite boring. Most of them are bored by doing that too, and it always comes across in their performances. It's not pleasant to attend. I would rather hear an artist perform some new material if it makes them more excited to be on stage.
I think there's a middle ground. Yes, Madonna may not be having Top 10 singles, but there is interest in her albums and hearing some new material from her. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,461
|
Quote:
Yep, it's touring and merchandise where these acts get their biggest amount of revenue.
A bit like The Rolling Stones and Cher who continue to have sell out tours all over the world (most of them tend to be America I think?) but they've not had a hit in the charts for years. They've built up a legacy, and Madonna is following suit. Music consumption has changed dramatically over the last 30 years. With streaming now becoming the norm rather than downloading, this is only to further change the way people get their music. Celebrity Networth.com says Cher is worth $320 million! I wouldn't of guessed even close to that. I guess it does pay to tour.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,940
|
Quote:
Celebrity Networth.com says Cher is worth $320 million! I wouldn't of guessed even close to that. I guess it does pay to tour. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 436
|
Quote:
Shouldn't the title 'Queen of Pop' be very subjective based on who's at the very top of their game at the minute? After all pop music is very transient and the height of pop is what's right now.
Right now I would say Queen of Pop would have to go to Taylor Swift but next month or year that could and probably will change. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,585
|
Queen of Charts?
I don't think anyone is King or Queen of charts currently. So many established artists/acts are having singles and albums that flop in the last 3 years. E.g. Nelly Furtado, No Doubt, Kellis, With reference to Madonna, her last album MDNA (that was released in the time span since 2099 ) was number 1 in many countries and grossed the largest tour by a female since 2009. So her legacy continues. However, the lead single GMAYL, in the UK suffered from a chart non count regulation and while sales should have ensure a top 10 hit, many sales were deemed ineligible due to chart rules. It was the second and third single release that perhaps was more alarming as they didn't chart high or even top 40. This is similar to many other established artists in the current climate e.g. Kylie , Lady Gaga (GUY - 3rd single). These are all artists who have good early week album sales and early demand. It seems single sales for album selling artists are clearly affected. Especially when they are established an ignored by radio stations playlists. It is currently a challenging place for established artists. Longevity of an artist may be harder to achieve among a download generation of albums and selective radio playlists. However, the real money in music is no longer in the release of singles and albums. It is in touring. Have a look at the highest grossing tours - makes for very interesting reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._concert_tours It would seem the kings of the charts currently, are One Direction. As their last tour has a huge money gross and they have had album and singles success world wide in the last 3 years too. Quite a surprise. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,288
|
Quote:
She may not have #1 hits anymore, but quite a few people are interested in her new songs and new album, certainly more than the Rolling Stones and Cher. There's been quite a lot of discussion of her 6 new songs on various blogs and articles and also of the demos that leaked. The fact that someone bothered to leak the demos shows that people are still interested in what she will do next. No one leaks Rolling Stones or Cher demos because no one cares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,818
|
Quote:
She may not have #1 hits anymore, ....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,473
|
Quote:
to put it mildly. She's not had a top 30 hit in Britain in half a decade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,303
|
Quote:
to put it mildly. She's not had a top 30 hit in Britain in half a decade.
She only released 4 in the years since. And although not a massive seller, Give Me All Your Loving only charted as it did because loads of downloads were not chart eligible. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,473
|
Quote:
The Rolling Stones and Cher have got twenty years on Madonna; if people are still leaking her demos in 2035 then you'll have a point.
The Rolling Stones are part of "the big three" when it comes to touring along with U2 and of course Madonna, no female artist comes close to her when it comes to touring. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,473
|
Quote:
Not really a fair comment though because she's only released a handful of singles in that time. She released 18 singles from 2000-2009. All but 3 made top 10.
She only released 4 in the years since. And although not a massive seller, Give Me All Your Loving only charted as it did because loads of downloads were not chart eligible. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:53.



Celebrity Networth.com says Cher is worth $320 million! I wouldn't of guessed even close to that. I guess it does pay to tour.