can we ever completely separate someones personal life from their professional life though?

Maybe now we should start to be saying what nice people those NOTW editors were, people really liked them and their parties, and maybe this means they shouldn't have been prosecuted and imprisioned for their professional life when they bugged murdered girls phones, and obtained stories through illegal methods?

I think over the past few years Perez Hilton has become less popular, which is perhaps why now he is starting to pull the now I am a grown up card, I apologise for some of my past stories?

For the first week or so I tend not to look too much into what a housemate has done before, just see who they are on CBB, how they are as a housemate. After a while I look more at who they are outside of the house, but I want to base them - even KH - on how they are in the house.

I'm giving KH a chance as a housemate even though I don't like her, because she could be a great housemate (but that wouldn't make me like her, just appreciate her as a BB housemate).

For now I'm liking having Perez in there, cause it'd be less interesting if he weren't. He's getting information out of housemates, he's interviewed them in more depth than BOTS did, he's loud, stirring it up a bit and annoying other people, he's a useful housemate and certainly not dull

I'm prepared to have my opinion changed on all of them, but for now I'm just going to see how they are in the game of BB.

If a NOTW editor was in the House and he came across as considerate and kind then yes I would judge him on that

I don't know much about Perez so have had to judge him on how he is in the House and I would do that similarly with HMs I do know like Kate who I despise, but am willing and open for her to change my mind about her.

I wondered (and always do) why it is that he (or anyone) thinks he should get things to be the way they want them to be. Why doesn't Perez get to have things the way he wants them to be? Or anyone else?

I mean, I don't necessarily disagree with him ... but always wonder about people who say ... "I don't want you doing _____, it bothers me. So stop." I mean, who are they to dictate to the world?

Now I get saying ... "this bothers me, I'd appreciate it if you'd try and stop." But to just out and out say ... stop doing that.

He'd drive me mental if I were in there with him but at the moment he's at least got something about him, is stirring the others up with his non stop questioning and indiscretion and is interesting.

Saying Perez is nice is a bit like someone claiming Katie Hopkins is a big fan of fat people.

Beautifully put.

I uasually love them - Julian Clary was one of my favourite HMs ever - but I'm disliking Perez more each day. I didn't know him from a bar of soap when he entered the house and thought he seemed ok, if a little pushy, on launch night - now he's just loud and infuriating.


That is shameful..


He wants to raise his profile in the UK (as I said earlier, I'd never seen him before) which is why he's in CBB. I forecast that his true character will out pretty soon as he's seemingly on his best behaviour for now...


So where do you draw the line? If someone has commited a horrendous crime - as NOTW staff did in the case of hacking a murdered girl's phone - how can you dismiss that and judge them purely on the act they portray for a few days.

I suppose I will draw the line wherever I see fit. Morality and taste is a very personal thing. As for Perez I still like him and will continue to keep judging him on how he is in the House.

I see, so Perez wasn't nice when he made sure that Ken had a bed when no one else gave a damn and he wasn't nice when he didn't scuttle out of the bathroom along with Nadia and Kav (I'm betting you think they are are nice ) when Ken came to join them? Clearly behaviours are subjective

And clearly no one is 100% nasty or 100% nice. The balance of his past actions indicates that he is not nice much of the time