DS Forums

 
 

4g vs 3g


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-01-2015, 11:07
benster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Blackburn
Posts: 396

Is 4g really that good, faster speeds is all well and good but means Internet data used up quicker, Mobile companies only want to give small amounts of data on contracts. EE thing was TV with no buffering buts what's the point when most people would have used all there data allowance up in less than an hour watching TV or a film etc. Before I moved to ee was on t-mobile with unlimited Internet and use to tether all the time, and watching TV and films online using 3g never had any buffering issues
benster is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 10-01-2015, 11:31
Gigabit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,887
Internet data doesn't get used up any faster.
Gigabit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 11:36
-GONZO-
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kent
Posts: 8,954
How do you come to the conclusion that a faster speed means your gonna use up your data any quicker than on 3G?
The only thing that's gonna be quicker is the time apps,music,video etc take to download and the length of time buffering while streaming will be reduced.
-GONZO- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 11:57
joeluken
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 248
How do you come to the conclusion that a faster speed means your gonna use up your data any quicker than on 3G?
The only thing that's gonna be quicker is the time apps,music,video etc take to download and the length of time buffering while streaming will be reduced.
Is video streaming optimised for the available data connection performance by some services ? I seem to recall some providers automatcially adjust bit rate based on connection speed so a faster connection may result in higher bit rate and therefore use more data.
joeluken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 12:00
jchamier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
Yes - YouTube and Netflix will increase quality if the data rate is higher. Netflix you can choose in your account settings (per user) to force it to stay on lower data rates. Not sure about YouTube.

But that isn't a 3G or 4G thing, that is the website doing something you're not in control of. Not really the mobile companies fault. The same happens if you go from ADSL to Fibre or Cable.
jchamier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 12:22
joeluken
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 248
But that isn't a 3G or 4G thing, that is the website doing something you're not in control of. Not really the mobile companies fault. The same happens if you go from ADSL to Fibre or Cable.
I'm not suggesting it is the mobile companies fault just that a faster data connection (up to a point) may consume more data due to a difference in content quality. Some people tend to think of data in absolute terms i.e. 1MB of data is 1MB of data irrespective of the connection speed rather than in terms of variable content quality i.e. faster (to a point) may consume more.
joeluken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 13:20
david16
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central Belt
Posts: 12,290
I'm not suggesting it is the mobile companies fault just that a faster data connection (up to a point) may consume more data due to a difference in content quality. Some people tend to think of data in absolute terms i.e. 1MB of data is 1MB of data irrespective of the connection speed rather than in terms of variable content quality i.e. faster (to a point) may consume more.
For light users on 4G just checking a few e-mails or trying to find out the up to date latest travel news on a low data allowance will probably not affect them at all compared with 3G.

But heavy users such as bluetooth tetherers who stretched their 3G to the absolute limit to get their money's worth might find their 4G data allowance may not cover them if it's set to the same number of GB's when they were on 3G as they can do a lot more downloading and streaming on 4G and at a faster rate.
david16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 13:37
d123
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,993
For light users on 4G just checking a few e-mails or trying to find out the up to date latest travel news on a low data allowance will probably not affect them at all compared with 3G.

But heavy users such as bluetooth tetherers who stretched their 3G to the absolute limit to get their money's worth might find their 4G data allowance may not cover them if it's set to the same number of GB's when they were on 3G as they can do a lot more downloading and streaming on 4G and at a faster rate.
Out of curiosity, why do you differentiate Bluetooth tetherers from the more common wifi tetherers? Do you think using Bluetooth for tethering uses more data? Or a different reason?
d123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 13:46
Chrysalis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leics
Posts: 581
I can tell you tethering the difference is very noticeble.

O2/Three/giffgaff 3g tether feels very laggy, slow web pages etc.

EE 4g tethered whilst is slower than VDSL the gap is far smaller. Its way more useable.
Chrysalis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 14:22
david16
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central Belt
Posts: 12,290
Out of curiosity, why do you differentiate Bluetooth tetherers from the more common wifi tetherers? Do you think using Bluetooth for tethering uses more data? Or a different reason?
I don't know.

I was just giving one example of heavy usage.
david16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 14:50
jchamier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
Doesn't make sense as bluetooth has a lower maximum data rate than WiFi.
jchamier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 16:24
d123
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,993
Doesn't make sense as bluetooth has a lower maximum data rate than WiFi.
That was what I thought, as well as being a lot more uncommon since iOS, WP and Android all started including an easy to use wifi hotspot feature.

Not to mention, Bluetooth tethering just seems archaic these days (for most users).
d123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 21:40
plymouthbloke1974
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Destination: Hard Brexit
Posts: 6,368
3G works perfectly for me. Get no 4G anywhere near here on Vodafone but 3G performance is spot on where I am. I don't miss 4G at all.
plymouthbloke1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 22:01
moox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,645
Internet data doesn't get used up any faster.
Some people like to use the "if you used it at full speed, you'd use up the data allowance in 3 femtoseconds" argument as if it means something.
moox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 22:20
Thine Wonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,577
Some people like to use the "if you used it at full speed, you'd use up the data allowance in 3 femtoseconds" argument as if it means something.
Only to people who boast about 50Mb/s speeds, saying what exactly do you need those speeds for? and then they are on a 5GB package to point out that if you did have a use for mobile speeds that fast it would last < 15 minutes.

The best argument yet was yours (I think it was you) who said it means that the network has a lot of overhead and indicates that even when very busy or in packed areas you should get good performance.
Thine Wonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 22:53
Chris1973
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 667
O2/Three/giffgaff 3g tether feels very laggy, slow web pages etc.
Must admit that i've not noticed any issues regarding lag or slow webpages when tethering on 3G in this area. Speeds are fairly consistent even during peak times, with around 10mbps from 3 and 12mbps from EE

Certainly when compared to 512k - 1mbps rural ADSL, 3G at these speeds is a huge step up.

Not expecting 4G around here until the 12th of Never - but i'm frequently thankful that the Mobile networks have achieved something with their 3G based technology that BT haven't even come close to doing in the last Ten years.

That said, we may as well be on the Moon in relation to O2 and Vodafone, whose nearest 3G coverage is about 10 - 12 miles away in any direction.
Chris1973 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:04
jchamier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
3G works perfectly for me. Get no 4G anywhere near here on Vodafone but 3G performance is spot on where I am. I don't miss 4G at all.
You're lucky! In my location Vodafone 3G is about 1megabit - but in some locations (where 4G is also present) I've seen 10megabit, and it beats O2. EE in comparison and Three manage about 12 to 15 on 3G. So voda is improving fast as they throw money at the network. It might be nationally usable by 2016
jchamier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:42
plymouthbloke1974
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Destination: Hard Brexit
Posts: 6,368
Ha ha! Ironically I get 3-5 Mbit/s however Ping is much much lower than Three (I was getting pings of 600-900ms on Three!) - my Vodaping (See what I did there?) is 50-60ms. I also notice when streaming Sky Go for example the full resolution picture shows right away, whereas on Three (and even EE) it took 30-40 seconds sometimes for "LegoVision" to stop.... Odd as the speeds were allegedly faster... Maybe Sky and Voda have some dedicated gateway set up?
plymouthbloke1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:46
japaul
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,662
There's still some odd gaps in Vodafone's 3G even where they have good 4G. Just after Christmas I was in Pewsey (near Marlborough in Wiltshire). 5 bars of 4G but absolutely zero 3G. Not a fault either as if you put Pewsey into the Vodafone coverage checker it shows exactly that. No problem with a 4G phone, not so great if you only have a 3G one. CSFB calls were fine though, all dropping back to 2G.
japaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2015, 01:03
Gigabit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,887
There's still some odd gaps in Vodafone's 3G even where they have good 4G. Just after Christmas I was in Pewsey (near Marlborough in Wiltshire). 5 bars of 4G but absolutely zero 3G. Not a fault either as if you put Pewsey into the Vodafone coverage checker it shows exactly that. No problem with a 4G phone, not so great if you only have a 3G one. CSFB calls were fine though, all dropping back to 2G.
Same issue in a lot of Hampshire. Good 4G in Alresford on Vodafone but no 3G. Good 4G in Four Marks (again on Vodafone) but no 3G. Average 3G (on you guessed it, Vodafone) in Alton and good 4G.

O2 should have 4G in those locations too but despite them showing up on the O2 coverage map, they are not activated. Very odd.
Gigabit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2015, 01:33
benster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Blackburn
Posts: 396
Is this good speeds for 3g
https://www.dropbox.com/s/p4xo35wbee...25-32.png?dl=0
benster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2015, 09:56
plymouthbloke1974
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Destination: Hard Brexit
Posts: 6,368
I'd be happy with that...
plymouthbloke1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2015, 11:48
jchamier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
Same issue in a lot of Hampshire. Good 4G in Alresford on Vodafone but no 3G. Good 4G in Four Marks (again on Vodafone) but no 3G. Average 3G (on you guessed it, Vodafone) in Alton and good 4G.
Same in Fleet and Farnborough, where 3G on Vodafone was awful, now its usable, and 4G is now visible. Sadly I don't have any Vodafone 4G SIM to test with.

O2 should have 4G in those locations too but despite them showing up on the O2 coverage map, they are not activated. Very odd.
O2 4G took about 4 months after Vodafone was enabled to be usable. I could see it on network scans occasionally, but my friends with O2 4G phones couldn't use - but then about a month after that they could use it and I can see it on a network scan.

They're both about 2 years behind EE, and with lower speeds in most places.
jchamier is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21.