|
||||||||
The Ratings Thread (Part 63) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,049
|
Quote:
2006 to 2009
- Prelude (Christmas 2006) - Part 1 (January 2007 to April 2008) - Part 2 (April 2008 to October 2008) - Part 3 (1) (October 2008 to November 2008) - Part 3 (2) (November 2008 to January 2009) - Part 3 (3) (January 2009 to March 2009) - Part 4 (August 2009 to October 2009) - Part 5 (October 2009 to December 2009) - Part 6 (December 2009 to February 2010) 2010 - Part 7 (February and March) - Part 8 (March and May) - Part 9 (May and June) - Part 10 (June to August) - Part 11 (August and September) - Part 12 (September and October) - Part 13 (October and November) - Part 14 (November and December) - Part 15 (December 2010 and January 2011) 2011 - Part 16 (January and February) - Part 17 (February and March) - Part 18 (March and April) - Part 19 (April and May) - Part 20 (May and June) - Part 21 (June and July) - Part 22 (July and August) - Part 23 (August) - Part 24 (August and September) - Part 25 (September and October) - Part 26 (October and November) - Part 27 (November) - Part 28 (November and December) - Part 29 (December 2011 and January 2012) 2012 - Part 30 (January) - Part 31 (January and February) - Part 32 (February and March) - Part 33 (March and April) - Part 34 (April and May) - Part 35 (May and June) - Part 36 (June) - Part 37 (June and July) - Part 38 (July and August) - Part 39 (August and September) - Part 40 (September and October) - Part 41 (October) - Part 42 (October and November) - Part 43 (November and December) - Part 44 (December 2012 and January 2013) 2013 - Part 45 (January and February) - Part 46 (February and March) - Part 47 (March and April) - Part 48 (April and May) - Part 49 (May to July) - Part 50 (July) - Part 51 (July and August) - Part 52 (August and September) - Part 53 (September and October) - Part 54 (October and November) - Part 55 (November and December) - Part 56 (December 2013 and January 2014) 2014 - Part 57 (January and February) - Part 58 (February to April) - Part 59 (April to June) - Part 60 (June to August) - Part 61 (August to October) - Part 62 (October to January 2015) 2015 - Part 63 (Current thread) Had this copied and pasted into word waiting for Part 63 63 threads is crazy! |
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 8,565
|
Quote:
"Earlier in the evening, Channel 5's Race to the Pole was seen by 317k (1.5%), while Ice Road Truckers played to 791k (3.4%)."
Martin Lewis's money-saving production is a very cost-effective performer in the anti-EastEnders slot, close to (or over) 3m with +1. |
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 11,673
|
What was Stars In Their Eyes last getting when it was on and what was its competition? I know the comparisons are vague but still, it would be interesting to see.
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 16,967
|
At last a new thread, the last one seemed to go on forever.
Tonight should be interesting. TV is facing far stronger competition than Splash, and I think for all TV should win its slot with 7 million, SITE should get 5 million. Should SITE stay strong, and bearing in mind its followed by the more popular SNT, I reckon TV should be down for this run. OK it's still a big deal for BBC One and far better than what they were showing two years ago, but ITV aren't playing dead this time. CBB trending as I expected with 2-2.5 million tuning in. I think the show now seems settled on Channel 5 and I reckon it should play out to over 2 million again this series. |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 12,567
|
Quote:
Shame April to July 2009 is missing. I really wanted to see the thread's reaction on the insane ratings Britain's Got Talent got during the Subo period. We hadn't seen ratings like those for ages
![]() ![]() We've just freed up another 144 pages. |
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 8,565
|
Robbie - my dad and nan also called it Stars in Your Eyes. Always used to be bug me! Quote:
What was Stars In Their Eyes last getting when it was on and what was its competition? I know the comparisons are vague but still, it would be interesting to see.
BBC One 17:45 - FILM: E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982): 4.41m 19:35 - The National Lottery - Jet Set: 6.49m 20:10 - Casualty: 9.10m 21:00 - Sea of Souls: 5.80m 22:00 - BBC News: 4.89m ITV 17:45 - New You've Been Framed!: 4.52m ... [intervening programmes did not make weekly top 30 and were therefore less than 4.43m] 19:10 - Stars in Their Eyes: 5.78m 20:10 - Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?: 6.09m 21:15 - Ultimate Force: 5.33m Note: No HD or +1 to worry about then. |
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 11,449
|
From the clips I've seen it looks to me like SITE will be just for fun and not serious, not that it was originally, but its going up against a more supposedly serious programme.
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 16,967
|
Quote:
Robbie - my dad and nan also called it Stars in Your Eyes. Always used to be bug me!
The 16th and 'final' series (before its current revival) was ten years ago. Here are the consolidated ratings on the night of the series opener, Saturday 15 January 2005: BBC One 17:45 - FILM: E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982): 4.41m 19:35 - The National Lottery - Jet Set: 6.49m 20:10 - Casualty: 9.10m 21:00 - Sea of Souls: 5.80m 22:00 - BBC News: 4.89m ITV 17:45 - New You've Been Framed!: 4.52m ... 19:10 - Stars in Their Eyes: 5.78m 20:10 - Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?: 6.09m 21:15 - Ultimate Force: 5.33m Note: No HD or +1 to worry about then. |
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 14,202
|
Quote:
I think Ice dragon1 was referring to the volume of comment expected, regardless of how TVUK rates.
With Kylie gone, the show facing potentially more formidable ITV competition than Splash! was last year (plus in the same genre), and audiences generally in decline, I think there is little doubt that the launch show's overnight average is going to be well down on last year's 8.4m/35%. |
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,812
|
Quote:
Check again.
![]() We've just freed up another 144 pages.
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ormskirk, Lancashire
Posts: 4,891
|
Quote:
I think Ice dragon1 was referring to the volume of comment expected, regardless of how TVUK rates.
With Kylie gone, the show facing potentially more formidable ITV competition than Splash! was last year (plus in the same genre), and audiences generally in decline, I think there is little doubt that the launch show's overnight average is going to be well down on last year's 8.4m/35%. |
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 8,565
|
Quote:
So SITE was still geting reasonable ratings after 13 years.
![]() Casualty was still big enough in those days for ITV to schedule around it, so it looks anyway. Ultimate Force with Ross Kemp passed me by at the time, but I saw re-runs heavily advertised on CBS Action recently. It's their highest-rating programme some weeks, occasionally going over 100k. |
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 11,130
|
I too can't see The Voice matching last year's 8.4m. I think 8m+ would be excellent, and 7.5-8.0m would be good. 7.0-7.5m would be OK but below all of last year's auditions (bar the last one that faced Saturday Night Takeaway). Below 7m would be a poor start.
No idea what Stars in Their Eyes will get. Could be 3.5m, could be 6m. I think The Voice will definitely beat it, but it should be an improvement on Splash at least (which got 3.7m on the same night last year). |
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,211
|
Quote:
Anything over 7m would count as a success, for me. Under 6.4m would be 'bad' but not entirely surprising either. My prediction, therefore, is 6.7m.
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Posts: 767
|
Quote:
Robbie - my dad and nan also called it Stars in Your Eyes. Always used to be bug me!
The 16th and 'final' series (before its current revival) was ten years ago. Here are the consolidated ratings on the night of the series opener, Saturday 15 January 2005: BBC One 17:45 - FILM: E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982): 4.41m 19:35 - The National Lottery - Jet Set: 6.49m 20:10 - Casualty: 9.10m 21:00 - Sea of Souls: 5.80m 22:00 - BBC News: 4.89m ITV 17:45 - New You've Been Framed!: 4.52m ... [intervening programmes did not make weekly top 30 and were therefore less than 4.43m] 19:10 - Stars in Their Eyes: 5.78m 20:10 - Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?: 6.09m 21:15 - Ultimate Force: 5.33m Note: No HD or +1 to worry about then. |
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,838
|
Quote:
Robbie - my dad and nan also called it Stars in Your Eyes. Always used to be bug me!
The 16th and 'final' series (before its current revival) was ten years ago. Here are the consolidated ratings on the night of the series opener, Saturday 15 January 2005: BBC One 17:45 - FILM: E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982): 4.41m 19:35 - The National Lottery - Jet Set: 6.49m 20:10 - Casualty: 9.10m 21:00 - Sea of Souls: 5.80m 22:00 - BBC News: 4.89m ITV 17:45 - New You've Been Framed!: 4.52m ... [intervening programmes did not make weekly top 30 and were therefore less than 4.43m] 19:10 - Stars in Their Eyes: 5.78m 20:10 - Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?: 6.09m 21:15 - Ultimate Force: 5.33m Note: No HD or +1 to worry about then. Look at Casualty, a monster! Just under 3m ahead of the next highest! |
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,838
|
My predictions...
The Voice- 7.7M Stars in Their Eyes- 4.6M |
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,232
|
Everyone mentioning Splash which collapsed towards the end but was 5-6m for its first series. SITE might not make that.
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,020
|
Quote:
Those 10 year ago ratings look very good for a few shows, especially SITE, but then again, would just under 6m be considered good back then? It was probably a few million below average in 2005.
Look at Casualty, a monster! Just under 3m ahead of the next highest! In respect of consolidated figures-did we ever get New Years Eve finals? (Especially the concert and fireworks) |
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,020
|
Quote:
My predictions...
The Voice- 7.7M Stars in Their Eyes- 4.6M |
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 8,565
|
Quote:
Those 10 year ago ratings look very good for a few shows, especially SITE, but then again, would just under 6m be considered good back then? It was probably a few million below average in 2005.
Mon 21:00 - The Commander: 7.43m Tue 21:00 - The Commander: 6.00m Wed 21:00 - Distant Shores: 6.40m [dramedy] Thu 21:00 - Taggart: 6.36m Fri 20:30 - A Touch of Frost (r): 5.33m Sat 21:15 - Ultimate Force: 5.33m Sun 20:00 - The Royal: 8.31m, 21:05 - Midsomer Murders: 8.80m plus The Bill twice a week at 20:00, plus the soaps. That was a lot of drama! Quote:
Look at Casualty, a monster! Just under 3m ahead of the next highest!
Only beaten on BBC One by EastEnders, on around 11-12m.Quote:
Casualty getting 9m+ just 10 years ago? How the mighty fall!
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 14,202
|
Quote:
Everyone mentioning Splash which collapsed towards the end but was 5-6m for its first series. SITE might not make that.
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 11,449
|
I assume most of you will be watching TVUK tonight?
Personally if SITE is good then I hope its a success. If its poor then it deserves too flop. There always a chance though with these programmes that the ratings can underwhem. By this I mean I hope SITE does not become one of ITV's middling rating shows. Either be a complete flop or big hit. In between is too boring. |
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 16,967
|
Quote:
Casualty getting 9m+ just 10 years ago? How the mighty fall!
Also the digital rollout didn't start until 2007 and over a third of homes still only had four channels, me included, so ratings would be higher due to a lack of choice for millions of people. |
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 11,449
|
Quote:
I no I still can't believe it got that.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:14.



63 threads is crazy!



