These things will always split opinion. Personally I agree with his removal his actions were not only unacceptable it was clear the man was in a bad place and a potential danger in such an overwhelming environment (especially with alcohol thrown into the mix)
He got kicked out over that seriously ???
3 of 6
Originally Posted by nojunkmail:
“Can't believe people are defending him and almost putting blame on Chloe.
She was visibly upset and he passed it of as nothing.
BB would have seen what happened and chose not to show it because it was probably as bad as it sounds.
If this happened outside, if it was your sister, your mother and someone they didn't know, a stranger, opened her robe and groped her, you'd be pretty angry!
He's a scumbag.”
“Can't believe people are defending him and almost putting blame on Chloe.
She was visibly upset and he passed it of as nothing.
BB would have seen what happened and chose not to show it because it was probably as bad as it sounds.
If this happened outside, if it was your sister, your mother and someone they didn't know, a stranger, opened her robe and groped her, you'd be pretty angry!
He's a scumbag.”
Why are you adding 'groped' into it?
What sister or mother goes around with strangers naked under a bathrobe?
Originally Posted by petewalsh_walsh:
“Not sticking up for him as he shouldn't have opened her robe but dont think he gropped her.”
“Not sticking up for him as he shouldn't have opened her robe but dont think he gropped her.”
She should have had underwear on.
Originally Posted by scottishmag:
“I think that BB was just looking for an excuse to remove him due to the comments about his mental state”
“I think that BB was just looking for an excuse to remove him due to the comments about his mental state”
But it's wrong for him to go out under those circumstances.
Guy shouldn't have been in the house in the first place. BB got nobody to blame but themselves for this.
Absolutely ridiculous decision from Big Brother. He didnt touch her skin or anything. He pulled her dressing gown down at one side after she was leaning over him with nothing underneath! (Who would do that in a open house! No one!)
He shouldnt have done it. However a warning is all he should have got.
All this ballicks from Perez and Chloe saying "I dont feel safe" SHUT UP!!!! Especially you Perez you complete tool!!!
He shouldnt have done it. However a warning is all he should have got.
All this ballicks from Perez and Chloe saying "I dont feel safe" SHUT UP!!!! Especially you Perez you complete tool!!!
Originally Posted by ScreamingTree<3:
“I don't understand why she is now scared to be in the house with him. At the end of the day she was nude under her robe and stayed in the loo with him, he was pretty drunk too.
I hope she gets booted out soon after him for some drunken stupidness.”
“I don't understand why she is now scared to be in the house with him. At the end of the day she was nude under her robe and stayed in the loo with him, he was pretty drunk too.
I hope she gets booted out soon after him for some drunken stupidness.”
But we're all naked under the clothes we're wearing. That fact doesn't give anyone the right to grope us.
Originally Posted by nojunkmail:
“Can't believe people are defending him and almost putting blame on Chloe.
She was visibly upset and he passed it of as nothing.
BB would have seen what happened and chose not to show it because it was probably as bad as it sounds.
If this happened outside, if it was your sister, your mother and someone they didn't know, a stranger, opened her robe and groped her, you'd be pretty angry!
He's a scumbag.”
“Can't believe people are defending him and almost putting blame on Chloe.
She was visibly upset and he passed it of as nothing.
BB would have seen what happened and chose not to show it because it was probably as bad as it sounds.
If this happened outside, if it was your sister, your mother and someone they didn't know, a stranger, opened her robe and groped her, you'd be pretty angry!
He's a scumbag.”
Did you watch the episode? He DIDNT grope her!!!!!!
Originally Posted by SecretPassage:
“But we're all naked under the clothes we're wearing. That fact doesn't give anyone the right to grope us.”
“But we're all naked under the clothes we're wearing. That fact doesn't give anyone the right to grope us.”
He DIDNT grope her!
Originally Posted by ScreamingTree<3:
“She should have had underwear on.”
“She should have had underwear on.”
Absolutely idiotic thing to say. How was she to know she would be groped?
Originally Posted by SecretPassage:
“But we're all naked under the clothes we're wearing. That fact doesn't give anyone the right to grope us.”
“But we're all naked under the clothes we're wearing. That fact doesn't give anyone the right to grope us.”
Hmmm.....you have fact and grope in the same sentence, couldn't make it up, oh hang on you just did.
Originally Posted by confuddled:
“He should be grateful he's not a Welsh footballer or he'd never...... Oh never mind
”
“He should be grateful he's not a Welsh footballer or he'd never...... Oh never mind
”
Poor ched
Originally Posted by SecretPassage:
“But we're all naked under the clothes we're wearing. That fact doesn't give anyone the right to grope us.”
“But we're all naked under the clothes we're wearing. That fact doesn't give anyone the right to grope us.”
When did it become "groping"?
I'm not sure what to make of it all really ...but her reaction was instant and she seemed genuinely shocked and upset.
There's always double standards in these things though. I remember a drunken Faye doing something similar to a mortified Anton - she was all over him and tried to pull his boxers down, seemingly in an attempt to grab hold of his penis - and she didn't even get a telling off from BB.
There's always double standards in these things though. I remember a drunken Faye doing something similar to a mortified Anton - she was all over him and tried to pull his boxers down, seemingly in an attempt to grab hold of his penis - and she didn't even get a telling off from BB.
Originally Posted by SecretPassage:
“But we're all naked under the clothes we're wearing. That fact doesn't give anyone the right to grope us.”
“But we're all naked under the clothes we're wearing. That fact doesn't give anyone the right to grope us.”
He did NOT grope her.
Originally Posted by wallster:
“When did it become "groping"?”
“When did it become "groping"?”
Don't let facts get in the way of fabrication
Originally Posted by nojunkmail:
“I'm pretty sure she said he did.
I'm sure BB would not have removed him for just opening her robe.”
“I'm pretty sure she said he did.
I'm sure BB would not have removed him for just opening her robe.”
She didn't say that and BB did remove him just for that, hence this thread.
Originally Posted by clara28:
“Absolutely idiotic thing to say. How was she to know she would be groped?”
“Absolutely idiotic thing to say. How was she to know she would be groped?”
She wasn't Groped
I'm really surprised how some of the peoples comments. Jeremy meant it in a sexual way to pull her grown down, but it's like saying this "if he was gay would the same thing happen?" Probably not.. Im on nor side, as everyone is complaining she wasn't wearing anything she went to help him and she doesn't expect her dressing gown to be pulled to one side. Chloe shouldn't of acted like that due to her completely over acting, as like she said she's done page 3 so I'm sure 1000s of men have seen her parts etc, she should of left it after the bathroom, went to the diary room by herself and explained it. Because how she was explaining it wasn't very fair on him at all. But how he was explaining it was very blunt and plain so it was very difficult to know what he actually had done.
3 of 6
