• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
He got kicked out over that seriously ???
<<
<
4 of 6
>>
>
amyawake
10-01-2015
Originally Posted by Rachelette:
“I think she's milking it to be honest.

However, he clearly has some really serious issues and probably shouldn't be there.”

Agree with both sentences. If she was just angry but not sobbing or shocked, would he still be there? Where were the tears? Looks a bit suspect to me....
treefr0g
10-01-2015
From his profile he did exactly what he was expected to do and was was ejected for doing so.

If things had gone another way and a romance had sparked up between the two, the infra-red cameras would be on their bed 24/7 and this incident would have been playful flirtation.

Will channel 5 never accept responsibility for their actions?
allie4
10-01-2015
Originally Posted by HoneyCrumbs:
“The thing is though, this guy has seemed almost unstable from the start. He seemed unhinged.”

However, he did not get kicked out for that. He got booted out because he drunkenly opened (or tried to open?) her dressing gown.
He did NOT fondle her - unless we're not being shown the whole truth - or try to kiss her or rape her.
BB have deliberately decided to make a huge deal out of this to get more viewing figures. They are totally inconsistent when deciding who gets kicked out for what and time and again have kept in housemates who have done FAR worse.
If they were genuinely concerned about his mental health, they should have said 'we're getting you out because we think you're not in a good enough state to handle this'.
Actually, he shouldn't have been in at all but that's BB for you.
Cynical and devious manipulation.
I've had enough
Diabolus
10-01-2015
Originally Posted by ScreamingTree<3:
“She should have had underwear on.”

Imagine that eh? First they get the vote now those dastardly women are getting us poor men in trouble when we pop their tits out, which is clearly our right to do as and when we fancy a bit of boob yeah? I mean if they aren't wearing underwear it's definitely their fault, right?

Jesus wept. When you think people can get on juries with views like yours, it's a worry.
MadeInHarry
10-01-2015
Originally Posted by allie4:
“However, he did not get kicked out for that. He got booted out because he drunkenly opened (or tried to open?) her dressing gown.
He did NOT fondle her - unless we're not being shown the whole truth - or try to kiss her or rape her.
BB have deliberately decided to make a huge deal out of this to get more viewing figures. They are totally inconsistent when deciding who gets kicked out for what and time and again have kept in housemates who have done FAR worse.
If they were genuinely concerned about his mental health, they should have said 'we're getting you out because we think you're not in a good enough state to handle this'.
Actually, he shouldn't have been in at all but that's BB for you.
Cynical and devious manipulation.
I've had enough”

Agree with you 100%.

They milked it out all today how shocking tonight would be, really? Do you really know what was shocking how Katie Hopkins had sense come out her mouth at Hilton.
nojunkmail
10-01-2015
Originally Posted by threecheeses:
“She didn't say that .”

What did she say? She said more than just opening the robe.
amyawake
10-01-2015
Actually the inflammatory use of the word 'negro', made by (mr. personality bypass) Ken, was maybe more up there in terms of shocking. Alexander took it very well in addressing it.
Natgar
10-01-2015
Gosh, I am shocked at some of the posts.Its like going back to when it was your fault if you were raped because you wore a short skirt. Nobody has the right to do what he did no matter what she wears. I am sure that BB saw the actual incident and made their decision on that.


Your body is yours and nobody has the right to touch or violate it no matter what you decide to do it with yourself. Some of the views on here really disgust and frighten me and people ask how some sexual abusers got away with it for so long, it's these views.
academia
10-01-2015
Originally Posted by MithMarr:
“Give her an Oscar, there were no tears. Job done lady, your safe for another week and completely trashed a mans reputation.”

Listen to what he said. He was very glib as he rolled out excuses- mixed drinks, why did she come. Into a private room with him, why did she make a pass, at him?He very clearly put the blame for his bad behaviour on her. That was more likely the reason for his ejection than what he actually did. The blaming and excuses rolled so smoothly off his tongue that I got the impression this how he deals with all sorts of incidents he's been involved in.
xorosetylerxo
10-01-2015
Didn't Denise pull down one of the twins pajamas pants and she went on to win the whole show?
Fairy Wings
10-01-2015
Originally Posted by Amaretto2:
“Things sure have changed on C5. I remember when Conor threatened to ram an epilator up Deana's vagina without her permission and the producers rewarded him with 50k and the public gave him a hero's welcome on exit!”

This ^^^^^^

Still makes me sick to my stomach.
Rixion
10-01-2015
Both Perez and Chloe were milking it
BROXI BEAR
10-01-2015
So if you had a daughter and you were out with her in a pub and some guy walked up to her and pulled down her top - you wouldn't want him kicked out of the pub?? You would just tell him not to do it again?
rosariofire
10-01-2015
Originally Posted by Natgar:
“Gosh, I am shocked at some of the posts.Its like going back to when it was your fault if you were raped because you wore a short skirt. Nobody has the right to do what he did no matter what she wears. I am sure that BB saw the actual incident and made their decision on that.


Your body is yours and nobody has the right to touch or violate it no matter what you decide to do it with yourself. Some of the views on here really disgust and frighten me and people ask how some sexual abusers got away with it for so long, it's these views.”

I totally agree. Those of you defending him, check yourselves. I'm disgusted.
azureanne
10-01-2015
Originally Posted by Anightlikethis:
“It's sexual assault and criminal.”

are you for real??????
StarryNight1983
10-01-2015
Originally Posted by nojunkmail:
“Can't believe people are defending him and almost putting blame on Chloe.

She was visibly upset and he passed it of as nothing.

BB would have seen what happened and chose not to show it because it was probably as bad as it sounds.

If this happened outside, if it was your sister, your mother and someone they didn't know, a stranger, opened her robe and groped her, you'd be pretty angry!

He's a scumbag.”

He wouldn't of got as far with me - as soon as he went for my robe I'd of pushed his hand away and told him to **** off!!
Jisuba
10-01-2015
I think there was more to this than Chloe's exposure. He's a really loose cannon and I think having a bit of a breakdown and he was removed for his own well being.
Maybe 😒
Ava_belle
10-01-2015
I am absolutely disgusted. Disgusted at Big Brother for allowing someone who is clearly unstable and vulnerable to go into the house and allow this to happen.

I do not condone what he did, not one bit! But, he did not grope her. As he described it, she was leaning over and he lifted her gown slightly........not right but he did not grope her, and I don't think his intention was to hurt Chloe in any shape or form, I think it was innocent.

Should he have been kicked out, yes, but so should Ken. To be honest, Ch 5 and Big Brother should reavaluate it's position, and the show should end.
Devon
10-01-2015
In my opinion., Jeremy was most definitely out of order, no question about it. And for the record, of course being a page 3 model certainly does not give anyone the right to grope or harass you but a warning would have definitely been sufficient in this case.
Everything has been blow way out of proportion ..... Channel 5 running scared.
Others have stayed who should have been thrown out. Connor McIntyre over the Deanna Uppal saga.
Devon
10-01-2015
Problem here is we did not see the footage. I think if we had people wouldn't have run away with it like they have and let me reiterate, I would never condone what he did, he was clearly in the wrong.
treefr0g
10-01-2015
Originally Posted by BROXI BEAR:
“So if you had a daughter and you were out with her in a pub and some guy walked up to her and pulled down her top - you wouldn't want him kicked out of the pub?? You would just tell him not to do it again?”

This isn't a pub. It's the Big Brother house.

You could use that analogy for any incident. And stealing a previous posters example, if you went into a pub with your daughter and a middle aged woman pulled their trousers down, you would want them kicked out.

Well in that particular case they not only stayed in the pub. But they won.
Cornchips
10-01-2015
Why would someone make a pass at someone who was sweating like a pig and puking over a toilet bowl? Does Jeremynthink he is so Irresistible?
nojunkmail
10-01-2015
Originally Posted by threecheeses:
“She didn't say that and BB did remove him just for that, hence this thread.”

Re watched it...

She said that he opened her gown and put / pulled her boob out.

If he even touched her boob then yes it was groping.
benbeez1
10-01-2015
it's stupid & Ken's still there ?
SegaGamer
10-01-2015
I'll just write what i wrote in another thread.

He himself said that she leaned in, being as drunk as he was i think he simply got the wrong end of the stick. If he wasn't drunk i'm sure he wouldn't have done that. It's not Chloe's fault which some people have been implying, it is Jeremy's fault for getting in the state he got in and putting himself in a situation where he can misread the signs. But i don't think it is as simple as saying it's sexual assult.
<<
<
4 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map