• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
I just googled 'Chloe Goodman tits'
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
Beetlejuice
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by Mrs Checks:
“Her body, her choice. She decides when she wants her breasts to be exposed, no one else (even if they're wasted).”

Yup. Self respect has nothing to do with it. She can make money by exposing her body if she wants to.. The question is WHY do women do that though? By that I mean what is their 'intent'. They could expose their faces, arms, bikini clad bodies, but WHY do frontal evocative naked boob shots in a paper or magazine for money do you think? Beats me.
bbcrzy
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by vpower:
“Her choice”

i dont believe it for a moment. Men talk women into getting their tops off.

Very few models immediately go for the NUDE jobs, at least here in north america.

This concept that its okay to show boobs because she gets PAID is bad.

IF you gave anyone a choice between supermodel runway, catalogue modelling good contract, maybe some designer muse OR getting her T*ts out....i think a woman with respect for herself would choose the NON NUDE jobs.

unless it really IS about the money, not a choice
Whedonite
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by Beetlejuice:
“Yup. Self respect has nothing to do with it. She can make money by exposing her body if she wants to.. The question is WHY do women do that though? By that I mean what is their 'intent'. They could expose their faces, arms, bikini clad bodies, but WHY do frontal evocative naked boob shots in a paper or magazine for money do you think? Beats me.”

Does Justin Bieber have no self respect because of his numerous topless pictures and his recent ad campaign? Does Michael Fassbender have no self respect because he went fully nude in Shame? Does Kate Winslet have no self respect? Helen Mirran? Bruce Willis?

I'm failing to see why someone has no self respect because they don't agree with you that bodies should always be covered in pictures or in movies
NaughtyNan
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by Ruthus:
“Bet I've seen more than Jeremy”

Well I only googled her name (without the tits bit) and all that I saw was tits. lol
Penny Crayon
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by Beetlejuice:
“Yup. Self respect has nothing to do with it. She can make money by exposing her body if she wants to.. The question is WHY do women do that though? By that I mean what is their 'intent'. They could expose their faces, arms, bikini clad bodies, but WHY do frontal evocative naked boob shots in a paper or magazine for money do you think? Beats me.”

Yes I expect she does do it for the money - it's probably a well paid job. What is your point though? What she does or doesn't do to make a living has no bearing or relevance to getting upset when someone makes a grab at her and exposes her breast.

Touching someone in a sexual way is a very personal thing - she did not consent to a drunken fumble in the toilet of the BB house - his advances were unwelcome, inappropriate and just plain wrong - it makes not a jot of difference what she does for a living.
bbcrzy
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by keeping_it_real:
“By your reasoning any prostitute that is raped should just put up and shut up because they do it for a living anyway.

I swear some of the people on the this forum are still living in the dark ages.”

i swear some people on this forum are comparing apples, orange and GRAPES.

its pretty clear from a few posts that some people are not aware what rape is.

its a violent act.

The suggestion that a prostitute is DOIng violent sex acts and allowing themselves to be Beat up and torn inside "as a living" is very very offensive.

please quit trying to equate a boob falling out of a open NONBUTTONED neckline to a rape.

its absolutely NOTHING the same
bbcrzy
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“Yes I expect she does do it for the money - it's probably a well paid job. What is your point though? What she does or doesn't do to make a living has no bearing or relevance to getting upset when someone makes a grab at her and exposes her breast.

Touching someone in a sexual way is a very personal thing - she did not consent to a drunken fumble in the toilet of the BB house - his advances were unwelcome, inappropriate and just plain wrong - it makes not a jot of difference what she does for a living.”

NO one has said in the house that Jeremy SEXUALLY touched her. She did not consent and he was too drunk to consent either.
Penny Crayon
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by bbcrzy:
“NO one has said in the house that Jeremy SEXUALLY touched her. She did not consent and he was too drunk to consent either.”

She said he pulled her dressing gown open to expose her breast - he didn't deny it. He fannied about saying he thought she had a swim suit on then changed tack and went all apologetic. I thought exposing someone's breast was a sexual thing to do ................maybe I'm a bit old fashioned. Why else would he be pulling at her dressing gown?

What exactly did he need to consent to?
Mrs Checks
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“She said he pulled her dressing gown open to expose her breast - he didn't deny it. He fannied about saying he thought she had a swim suit on then changed tack and went all apologetic. I thought exposing someone's breast was a sexual thing to do ................maybe I'm a bit old fashioned. Why else would he be pulling at her dressing gown?

What exactly did he need to consent to?”

It's not even being old fashioned - he admitted he thought she was coming on to him, thus it cannot be denied he had some sexual intent.
soapmania
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by Mrs Checks:
“It's not even being old fashioned - he admitted he thought she was coming on to him, thus it cannot be denied he had some sexual intent.”

I can understand how he thought that since the night before she was demonstrating at the pool how she can make her t*ts move right in front of him.

I don't agree with what he did, I'm just saying I can understand how Jeremy got the wrong idea.
Hazellou
12-01-2015
He exposed her WITHOUT permission. There is never an excuse for that, even if he in his drunken state thought she was flirting. It is an invasion of someones privacy and it likely left her feeling vulnerable and violated.

What is okay about that? Explain to me because I genuinely don't understand just why people think it's acceptable?
bbcrzy
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by Hazellou:
“He exposed her WITHOUT permission. There is never an excuse for that, even if he in his drunken state thought she was flirting. It is an invasion of someones privacy and it likely left her feeling vulnerable and violated.

What is okay about that? Explain to me because I genuinely don't understand just why people think it's acceptable?”

we dont know what kind of stuff they were doing to each other the past 3 days. pulling at each others clothes could have been part of the fun, we dont know, we dont have feeds.

all we can do is guess.
bratwurzt
12-01-2015
They keep telling Ken he shouldn't mention or look at these young girls' arses. All he has to do is wait until he gets out, open a magazine with Chloe in it and shuffle himself into a frenzy - with her permission.
MySkass
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“Well said. Regardless of what anyone does for a living - no one has the right to touch them inappropriately - you cant go around pulling at peoples clothes and exposing their body uninvited.

Not sure how anyone can defend/excuse his behaviour. There are boundaries that really shouldn't be crossed - he crossed them IMO.”


Thank you. It's sad that men and women think that because she poses nude anyone can touch her.

A woman can wear a bathing suit at the beach. That does not mean she should get her skirt pulled up when she's out and about.
KT_Dog
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by bratwurzt:
“They keep telling Ken he shouldn't mention or look at these young girls' arses. All he has to do is wait until he gets out, open a magazine with Chloe in it and shuffle himself into a frenzy - with her permission.”

At his age? Phhht! The only shuffling he'll do these days is when he's playing bridge.
JMinLondon
12-01-2015
Right, I am gonna find Mike Tyson and punch him in the face.

Apparently that is ok, as that is what he did for a living.
bozzimacoo
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“Well said. Regardless of what anyone does for a living - no one has the right to touch them inappropriately - you cant go around pulling at peoples clothes and exposing their body uninvited.

Not sure how anyone can defend/excuse his behaviour. There are boundaries that really shouldn't be crossed - he crossed them IMO.”



Denise Welch did to the twinny and went on to win CBB.
bratwurzt
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by JMinLondon:
“Right, I am gonna find Mike Tyson and punch him in the face.

Apparently that is ok, as that is what he did for a living.”

Tyson would fight you back....not run off screaming like a bitch.
hippychickxxx
12-01-2015
a question to the FMs who are saying that chloe can't do a job like that then get upset if someone looks at her b00bs

nurses/drs see naked bodies everyday - does that mean they shouldn't or can't be offended or upset if someone flashes at her/him?

same for physio-therapists, they're touching ppl all day - does that mean that they can be groped and should just shrug it off?

there are plenty of jobs that involve ppls bodies - this does not mean that the ppl who do those jobs can be treated differently regarding their personal space
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map