|
||||||||
Disgusted with this forum's reaction to Jeremy |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,713
|
Disgusted with this forum's reaction to Jeremy
I don't care what 'state' he was in, you never do that to any woman
The man forcefully removed her clothing while they were alone in the bathroom, he deserved to get kicked out But of course this forum consider Jeremy 'interesting' just like all weirdos are considered 'interesting' on here for some reason and defend him despite his behavior |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,892
|
I agree op. Not all think she's to blame
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,770
|
I completely agree with you.
Also disgusted at the idea being floated that Chloe is milking it. Terrifying that people hold these opinions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,713
|
Quote:
I completely agree with you.
Also disgusted at the idea being floated that Chloe is milking it. Terrifying that people hold these opinions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 119
|
Indeed.
Its like saying she's wearing a short skirt she deserves it. Staggeringly Jeremy wasnt the worst thing about tonight episode |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
|
I'm shocked so many think that it's apparently okay to pull down a woman's clothes because 'they do page 3' or 'wear exposing bikinis anyway'
And don't get me started on the 'She shouldn't have been naked underneath her clothes' line. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,395
|
I agree it was unacceptable, but was it okay last night when Cami started to stroke Calum's bum?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,033
|
Quote:
I completely agree with you.
Also disgusted at the idea being floated that Chloe is milking it. Terrifying that people hold these opinions. She massively overreacted , no question |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,295
|
There is a disturbing element that has crept into this forum in the last couple of years
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 1,480
|
Quote:
I agree it was unacceptable, but was it okay last night when Cami started to stroke Calum's bum?
Men can't be sexually assaulted it seems |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,032
|
I'm disgusted too by the forum behaviour, clearly over reacting and painting him as some sort of rapist. Such an overeaction... he should not have been kicked out & seems like a nice guy
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 18,879
|
I think it was an overreaction. Yes not nice at all to do to a woman but a warning would suffice yes...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5,291
|
He never grouped her. Chloe is making false allegations. He touched her clothing. Chloe is milking it for the magazine deals when she's out and to be safe from eviction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,713
|
Quote:
I agree it was unacceptable, but was it okay last night when Cami started to stroke Calum's bum?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 8,502
|
He dropped a boob by dropping a boob, then apologised. No big deal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 16,973
|
Quote:
I don't care what 'state' he was in, you never do that to any woman
The man forcefully removed her clothing while they were alone in the bathroom, he deserved to get kicked out But of course this forum consider Jeremy 'interesting' just like all weirdos are considered 'interesting' on here for some reason and defend him despite his behavior |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,638
|
I disagree and I am female. What he did was wrong, but she was in there with nothing underneath her robe. He didn't force himself onto her and her other behaviour in the house with her bikini on wasn't exactly an example of a wall flower.
I would have slapped him and then told him to come to speak to BB with me and sorted it out with maturity. Now if he had pulled her robe off and or pinned her to a wall and groped her then she might have a point. He was drunk and stupid. She was stupid too and for sure we'll see more stupid behaviour from her. Rule number 1, don't stay in a loo with someone when you've nothing under your robe and they're wasted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
|
Quote:
You clearly don't understand BB rules. Denise Welch done exactly the same thing last year and won
Men can't be sexually assaulted it seems |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,030
|
So am I, I'm genuinely shocked people were defending Jeremy and even Ken for what happened tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,689
|
Quote:
I agree it was unacceptable, but was it okay last night when Cami started to stroke Calum's bum?
there's always two sides to a story, so i'll wait before i call him a sexual predator |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,156
|
It's not just here. The Facebook post is full of people saying she deserved it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 67,823
|
Whilst I have some sympathy for Jeremy in that he should never have been in there in the first place, I find his behaviour towards Chloe unacceptable. He touched her without permission, in a sexual way and she was clearly upset by it.
Would I have reacted in the same way as Chloe did? Probably not although my reaction would have been to smack him one and then we both would have been kicked out. However I do think Chloe's reaction to it is justified and what might be considered within reasonable limits of the way someone might react. Perez in the other hand is a complete arse. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cutting the grass at OT
Posts: 6,098
|
Its a tough one, personally I thought she would be stronger and not so quick to tears due to the nature of her job. I felt she would have been used to men leering over her and trying it on. That said she obviously has a right not to feel intimidated or be touched in the way Jeremy did. At the end of the day nobody actually seen what happened so we only have both of there accounts of the situation.
Im still shocked that Ken is still there as he was clearly visable in his actions and should be gone too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,524
|
Agreed. Thankfully the law doesn't see it that way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,030
|
Quote:
He never grouped her. Chloe is making false allegations. He touched her clothing. Chloe is milking it for the magazine deals when she's out and to be safe from eviction.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:14.


