|
||||||||
Disgusted with this forum's reaction to Jeremy |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 199
|
Quote:
He never grouped her. Chloe is making false allegations. He touched her clothing. Chloe is milking it for the magazine deals when she's out and to be safe from eviction.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,808
|
Quote:
I don't care what 'state' he was in, you never do that to any woman
The man forcefully removed her clothing while they were alone in the bathroom, he deserved to get kicked out But of course this forum consider Jeremy 'interesting' just like all weirdos are considered 'interesting' on here for some reason and defend him despite his behavior |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,687
|
Quote:
Indeed.
Its like saying she's wearing a short skirt she deserves it. Staggeringly Jeremy wasnt the worst thing about tonight episode Jeremy behaved VERY inappropriately whilst drunk. Ken is a racist, homophobic misogynist and he should have gone. Quote:
He never grouped her. Chloe is making false allegations. He touched her clothing. Chloe is milking it for the magazine deals when she's out and to be safe from eviction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,713
|
Quote:
He never grouped her. Chloe is making false allegations. He touched her clothing. Chloe is milking it for the magazine deals when she's out and to be safe from eviction.
I can't tell if you're being serious |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 2,888
|
Quote:
Eh? Denise pulled down the clothes of another woman...
...... double standards if you ask me
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 14,231
|
Quote:
There is a disturbing element that has crept into this forum in the last couple of years
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,524
|
Quote:
Its a tough one, personally I thought she would be stronger and not so quick to tears due to the nature of her job. I felt she would have used to men leering over her and trying it on. That said she obviously has a right not to feel intimidated or be touched in the way Jeremy did. At the end of the day nobody actually seen what happened so we only have both of there accounts of the situation.
Im still shocked that Ken is still there as he was clearly visable in his actions and should be gone too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,905
|
Quote:
I disagree and I am female. What he did was wrong, but she was in there with nothing underneath her robe. He didn't force himself onto her and her other behaviour in the house with her bikini on wasn't exactly an example of a wall flower.
I would have slapped him and then told him to come to speak to BB with me and sorted it out with maturity. Now if he had pulled her robe off and or pinned her to a wall and groped her then she might have a point. He was drunk and stupid. She was stupid too and for sure we'll see more stupid behaviour from her. Rule number 1, don't stay in a loo with someone when you've nothing under your robe and they're wasted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,697
|
He said he didn't know she was naked. EXACTLY so he shouldn't be pulling her dressing gown over. I think he's used to getting away with that kind of crap with his groupies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,208
|
Quote:
Indeed.
Its like saying she's wearing a short skirt she deserves it. Staggeringly Jeremy wasnt the worst thing about tonight episode Jeremy was completely wrong and words can't express what I thought of Ken!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5,291
|
Quote:
He pulled her clothing exposing her breast FGS |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,032
|
Jeremy has been stitched up & his reputation ruined, he was drunk & attracted to the girl, he acted probably like 50% of drunk guys would in that situation
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 2,562
|
I'll content myself with crticising Jeremy, Ken and Chloe for various reasons and the producers for their hypocrisy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 67,823
|
Quote:
I agree it was unacceptable, but was it okay last night when Cami started to stroke Calum's bum?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,252
|
As soon as I saw it I thought "well he obviously should be kicked out but DS will obviously try to defend him." So sad and predictable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 40,757
|
Quote:
Whilst I have some sympathy for Jeremy in that he should never have been in there in the first place, I find his behaviour towards Chloe unacceptable. He touched her without permission, in a sexual way and she was clearly upset by it.
Would I have reacted in the same way as Chloe did? Probably not although my reaction would have been to smack him one and then we both would have been kicked out. However I do think Chloe's reaction to it is justified and what might be considered within reasonable limits of the way someone might react. Perez in the other hand is a complete arse. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 119
|
Quote:
I disagree and I am female. What he did was wrong, but she was in there with nothing underneath her robe. He didn't force himself onto her and her other behaviour in the house with her bikini on wasn't exactly an example of a wall flower.
I would have slapped him and then told him to come to speak to BB with me and sorted it out with maturity. Now if he had pulled her robe off and or pinned her to a wall and groped her then she might have a point. He was drunk and stupid. She was stupid too and for sure we'll see more stupid behaviour from her. Rule number 1, don't stay in a loo with someone when you've nothing under your robe and they're wasted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,808
|
Quote:
My God, do you lot ever stop?!
I can't tell if you're being serious
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,713
|
Quote:
Oh do stop with the sensationalsim and attention seeking... he didn't forcefully remove any of her clothing. His behaviour was deemed inappropriate by BB and he's gone. End of....
You seem to have very strange moral sense Then again this is the same person who was supporting someone that was wishing Katie Hopkins dead on another thread... |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 25,714
|
Disgusting, but not really surprising to be honest. Victim blaming is still endemic, especially when the victim is a woman. They always "asked for it" in some way or an other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,638
|
Quote:
False allegations? he admitted it himself He pulled her robe open, didn't matter if she was wearing anything or not he shouldn't do done it either way.
Bad judgement from a drunken fool. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5,291
|
You can quote me on this if I'm wrong, but 100% Chloe will be doing all the mags when she's out:
"Chloe bares all on her sexual assault attack!" "We get to the truth of BB Chloe's groping!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,713
|
Quote:
Disgusting, but not really surprising to be honest. Victim blaming is still endemic, especially when the victim is a woman. They always "asked for it" in some way or an other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cutting the grass at OT
Posts: 6,098
|
Quote:
You are so in the dark it's depressing to read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 640
|
Has the footage been shown of what actually happened?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:18.




...... double standards if you ask me
Jeremy was completely wrong and words can't express what I thought of Ken!