DS Forums

 
 

Disgusted with this forum's reaction to Jeremy


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-01-2015, 23:19
Sylvia
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 14,231
Jeremy behaved VERY inappropriately whilst drunk. Ken is a racist, homophobic misogynist and he should have gone.
I have to say I agree with you. The n---- and p-------- words and the talk of women's bums by Ken were far more shocking to me than Jeremy's alleged actions. He should have been ejected too.

On the bright side, he will now almost certainly be evicted via the public vote on Tuesday.
Sylvia is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 10-01-2015, 23:19
Cornchips
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 67,823
Has the footage been shown of what actually happened?
There are no cameras in the bathrooms for CBB
Cornchips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:19
Scarlett Berry
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,808
So pulling off her robe isn't forcefully removing her clothing? Lol, right then

You seem to have very strange moral sense
Then again this is the same person who was supporting someone that was wishing Katie Hopkins dead on another thread...
I will say this only once, do not now or EVER question my moral compass. How bloody dare you. Do not now or ever make personal defamatory insults to me. Debate all you want, up for that, but do not resort to petty lies and insults.

I most certainly did not support anyone wishing Katie dead either. So lets make that clear whilst were at it.

I love a good old debate but will not accept puerile crap from you on anyone. especailly you who went off on a tangent about a vt that you clearly didn't watch ...it was reference to George Galloway & you went on a tirade about George GILBY... so lets just say your comprehension is skewed or you are unable to get your facts straight.
Scarlett Berry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:19
iMatt_101
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,713
Did Denise Welch get thrown out?
It's different when it's two heterosexual women
However I do think Denise's behavior was inappropriate
iMatt_101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:21
xorosetylerxo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,556
It's different when it's two heterosexual women
However I do think Denise's behavior was inappropriate
Why is it different?

She still pulled down her clothing without permission
xorosetylerxo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:21
Stan_B
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 519
Jeremy is a weirdo. The way he has acted and spoken in there suggests he has all sorts of psychological problems. He seemed to get drunk very quickly. I am in no way defending what he did but would not be surprised if he was on some form of medication which possibly reacted with the alcohol.

Either way they were right to kick him out.
Stan_B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:21
Leeah
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 18,879
There are no cameras in the toilet for celebrity BB
Really? So they're just taking how Chloe's says it then ... I thought they were checking on the camera's why they left it until the next morning.
Leeah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:21
Julian-Freak
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,760
There is a disturbing element that has crept into this forum in the last couple of years
Agreed.
The Hazel and Daley debates on this forum made me leave for a while and it seems to be getting worse.

Jeremy should not have done what he did. Okay , he was drunk , but his reasoning afterwards was beyond belief. Just like Daley's.
The opinions of some towards the females on this forum sicken me.

Thank goodness Viacom had the intelligence to boot him.
Julian-Freak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:21
clara28
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,458
I disapprove of the victim blaming nonsense here today, they both made mistakes, he is paying the price for it. He did something wrong, but she shouldn't have been walking round the house with nothing on under her robe.
He didn't force himself on her and for sure in days to come she'll be frolicking round the house half naked with her bust on display flirting up a storm but that will be ok cos that's her choice?!

Drunk man alone in loo with an attractive female... he didn't grope her, he didn't pin her to a wall and force himself on her. He made a stupid drunken mistake.
Yes that will be okay. It's called having bodily autonomy and choosing who gets to touch you and when. Hardly a radical concept.
clara28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:22
Devon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,939
I think it was an overreaction. Yes not nice at all to do to a woman but a warning would suffice yes...
I agree.
Devon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:22
ScreamingTree<3
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,638
So its ok to try to expose somebody? Eff off. If I walk up to a girl with a short skirt on in the street and stick my hand up it I would rightly find myself with a criminal conviction . Youe defense of someone having a lunge at at a stranger because she is wearing only a dressing gown is laughable.
She wasn't a stranger to him, and if you actually listened to him and his explanation you'd have heard that your scenario and what happened are two very different things.
ScreamingTree<3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:22
JonDoe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 30,158
Can we all stop being 'disgusted'?

We're all watching the bloody thing, which, let's be honest, is tantamount to voyeurism in itself. Hardly bastions of good taste and purity, are we?
JonDoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:23
iMatt_101
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,713
I will say this only once, do not now or EVER question my moral compass. How bloody dare you. Do not now or ever make personal defamatory insults to me. Debate all you want, up for that, but do not resort to petty lies and insults.

I most certainly did not support anyone wishing Katie dead either. So lets make that clear whilst were at it.

I love a good old debate but will not accept puerile crap from you on anyone.
LMFAO you're the one that called me a sensationalist and an attention seeker
And maybe don't post such crap then?
You seriously cannot call a drunken idiot ripping off another girls robe 'not forcefully removing her clothing'

And yes you did
Someone made a thread talking about wanting Katie Hopkins dead, and I said how ridiculous they were, and you were taking his side because of past comments Katie made
iMatt_101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:23
Scarlett Berry
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,808
Can we all stop being 'disgusted'?

We're all watching the bloody thing, which, let's be honest, is tantamount to voyeurism in itself. Hardly bastions of good taste and purity, are we?
Well said Jon
Scarlett Berry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:23
ScreamingTree<3
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 4,638
Yes that will be okay. It's called having bodily autonomy and choosing who gets to touch you and when. Hardly a radical concept.
I am pretty sure you'll be eating those words when the days go by and her time in the house shows her up
ScreamingTree<3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:23
Warp
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,030
Really? So they're just taking how Chloe's says it then ... I thought they were checking on the camera's why they left it until the next morning.
Jeremy admitted he was curious to see what she had on beneath.
Warp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:23
NaughtyNan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,026
I don't care what 'state' he was in, you never do that to any woman
The man forcefully removed her clothing while they were alone in the bathroom, he deserved to get kicked out

But of course this forum consider Jeremy 'interesting' just like all weirdos are considered 'interesting' on here for some reason and defend him despite his behavior
Really now.
NaughtyNan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:24
Anightlikethis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,524
I will say this only once, do not now or EVER question my moral compass.
Well considering what you posted
Anightlikethis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:24
Mrs Checks
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,770
Agreed.
The Hazel and Daley debates on this forum made me leave for a while and it seems to be getting worse.

Jeremy should not have done what he did. Okay , he was drunk , but his reasoning afterwards was beyond belief. Just like Daley's.
The opinions of some towards the females on this forum sicken me.

Thank goodness Viacom had the intelligence to boot him.
I'm just glad I wasn't here for the Daley incident! I am horrified. There are only a handful of posters keeping my faith in humanity right now.
Mrs Checks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:24
Whedonite
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 5,714
I disapprove of the victim blaming nonsense here today, they both made mistakes, he is paying the price for it. He did something wrong, but she shouldn't have been walking round the house with nothing on under her robe.
He didn't force himself on her and for sure in days to come she'll be frolicking round the house half naked with her bust on display flirting up a storm but that will be ok cos that's her choice?!
Drunk man alone in loo with an attractive female... he didn't grope her, he didn't pin her to a wall and force himself on her. He made a stupid drunken mistake.
Erm... yes! You disapprove of victim blaming, yet it sounds like you just did it. Chloe can choose to be half naked herself and if she does choose to walk around half naked, that has nothing to do with a guy pulling off her robe.
Whedonite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:25
Natgar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,823
I will say this only once, do not now or EVER question my moral compass. How bloody dare you. Do not now or ever make personal defamatory insults to me. Debate all you want, up for that, but do not resort to petty lies and insults.

I most certainly did not support anyone wishing Katie dead either. So lets make that clear whilst were at it.

I love a good old debate but will not accept puerile crap from you on anyone. especailly you who went off on a tangent about a vt that you clearly didn't watch ...it was reference to George Galloway & you went on a tirade about George GILBY... so lets just say your comprehension is skewed or you are unable to get your facts straight.
Any moral co pass which excuses the behaviour of Jeremeyis in actual fact questionable. TG the law agrees, because the average reasonable person knows that a persons right to their own body is sacred.
Natgar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:25
JonDoe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 30,158
Cheers.

Jeez, it's been a while, I forgot how hardcore it can get on here.
JonDoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:25
Notaword
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,586
I am not a fan of Chloe or jermamy so I have no agenda in defending either. As a women I understand wherechloe is coming from......it does not matter that the girl shows her tits for money or nor not the fact is she went to comfort someone who was in distress and when she left that particular venue, room or whatever she was distressed because she felt upset by what had happened and for me that is her right.


Jermany has himself said that he opened the dressing robe/gown......if he read the signals right or wrong is not the issue....Chloe has said that she did not encouraged her any to touch her or expose her so we have to believe her and assess the situation accordingly. I have only watch via a tv screen jermany and there is no way on this earth that I would have him opening my robe and trying to fondle my breasts, bay watch star or not (joke) ....... Maybe I am naive or just a prat but I get the vibe that jermany thinks he has some entitlement to touch whoevers boobies because he can. Come on BB get this chap some help.
Notaword is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:25
Twinkle toes no
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,661
LMFAO you're the one that called me a sensationalist and an attention seeker
And maybe don't post such crap then?
You seriously cannot call a drunken idiot ripping off another girls robe 'not forcefully removing her clothing'
It's people like you and your making up what happened that gets on my wick. Why make things up?
Twinkle toes no is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 23:25
cavalli
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,905
Jeremy should not be persecuted solely based on the story of a grossly over acting woman - never seen over acting like it! Not one person on any of these threads saw what happened and Jeremy probably has hazy memories because he was still half cut from the night before.

As a woman, the women in there embarrass me with their hyper sensitive behavior to everything that gets said! God what boring specimens they are! I actually prefer Katie to any of them. That house smacks of double standards - look at that stupid Cami whi whines everytime Ken says anything yet walks around in under wear and clothing that puts the tiniest strip of cloth over her fake tits! Disgrace to the female race!

Ken is only doing what he is doing to wind them up because he is getting a reaction out of them.
I was thinking of starting a thread on that - the huge gulf between how sexually free and liberated these young girls are and how prissy and precious they are when it suits.

I've probably worded that very badly, just to be clear I'm not saying that they deserve to be perved over because they walk around in bikinis all day - I'm just trying to understand, as an older woman, where they're coming from because it struck be as odd and not something I can relate to.
cavalli is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:14.