I have to say I agree with you. The n---- and p-------- words and the talk of women's bums by Ken were far more shocking to me than Jeremy's alleged actions. He should have been ejected too.

On the bright side, he will now almost certainly be evicted via the public vote on Tuesday.

There are no cameras in the bathrooms for CBB

I will say this only once, do not now or EVER question my moral compass. How bloody dare you. Do not now or ever make personal defamatory insults to me. Debate all you want, up for that, but do not resort to petty lies and insults.

I most certainly did not support anyone wishing Katie dead either. So lets make that clear whilst were at it.

I love a good old debate but will not accept puerile crap from you on anyone. especailly you who went off on a tangent about a vt that you clearly didn't watch ...it was reference to George Galloway & you went on a tirade about George GILBY... so lets just say your comprehension is skewed or you are unable to get your facts straight.

It's different when it's two heterosexual women
However I do think Denise's behavior was inappropriate

Why is it different?

She still pulled down her clothing without permission

Jeremy is a weirdo. The way he has acted and spoken in there suggests he has all sorts of psychological problems. He seemed to get drunk very quickly. I am in no way defending what he did but would not be surprised if he was on some form of medication which possibly reacted with the alcohol.

Either way they were right to kick him out.

Really? So they're just taking how Chloe's says it then ... I thought they were checking on the camera's why they left it until the next morning.

Agreed.
The Hazel and Daley debates on this forum made me leave for a while and it seems to be getting worse.

Jeremy should not have done what he did. Okay , he was drunk , but his reasoning afterwards was beyond belief. Just like Daley's.
The opinions of some towards the females on this forum sicken me.

Thank goodness Viacom had the intelligence to boot him.

Yes that will be okay. It's called having bodily autonomy and choosing who gets to touch you and when. Hardly a radical concept.

I agree.

She wasn't a stranger to him, and if you actually listened to him and his explanation you'd have heard that your scenario and what happened are two very different things.

Can we all stop being 'disgusted'?

We're all watching the bloody thing, which, let's be honest, is tantamount to voyeurism in itself. Hardly bastions of good taste and purity, are we?

LMFAO you're the one that called me a sensationalist and an attention seeker
And maybe don't post such crap then?
You seriously cannot call a drunken idiot ripping off another girls robe 'not forcefully removing her clothing'

And yes you did
Someone made a thread talking about wanting Katie Hopkins dead, and I said how ridiculous they were, and you were taking his side because of past comments Katie made

Well said Jon

I am pretty sure you'll be eating those words when the days go by and her time in the house shows her up

Jeremy admitted he was curious to see what she had on beneath.

Really now.

Well considering what you posted

I'm just glad I wasn't here for the Daley incident! I am horrified. There are only a handful of posters keeping my faith in humanity right now.

Erm... yes! You disapprove of victim blaming, yet it sounds like you just did it. Chloe can choose to be half naked herself and if she does choose to walk around half naked, that has nothing to do with a guy pulling off her robe.

Any moral co pass which excuses the behaviour of Jeremeyis in actual fact questionable. TG the law agrees, because the average reasonable person knows that a persons right to their own body is sacred.

Cheers.

Jeez, it's been a while, I forgot how hardcore it can get on here.

I am not a fan of Chloe or jermamy so I have no agenda in defending either. As a women I understand wherechloe is coming from......it does not matter that the girl shows her tits for money or nor not the fact is she went to comfort someone who was in distress and when she left that particular venue, room or whatever she was distressed because she felt upset by what had happened and for me that is her right.


Jermany has himself said that he opened the dressing robe/gown......if he read the signals right or wrong is not the issue....Chloe has said that she did not encouraged her any to touch her or expose her so we have to believe her and assess the situation accordingly. I have only watch via a tv screen jermany and there is no way on this earth that I would have him opening my robe and trying to fondle my breasts, bay watch star or not (joke) ....... Maybe I am naive or just a prat but I get the vibe that jermany thinks he has some entitlement to touch whoevers boobies because he can. Come on BB get this chap some help.

It's people like you and your making up what happened that gets on my wick. Why make things up?

I was thinking of starting a thread on that - the huge gulf between how sexually free and liberated these young girls are and how prissy and precious they are when it suits.

I've probably worded that very badly, just to be clear I'm not saying that they deserve to be perved over because they walk around in bikinis all day - I'm just trying to understand, as an older woman, where they're coming from because it struck be as odd and not something I can relate to.