you speak for yourself

I agree if those are morals send me to hell.

Yea its always in their contracts, cant risk a screen grab or mobile pic from a monitor showing a Celeb having a dump!

I think the guy is in a bad place at the moment. He needs to leave the house get back to america and be around his family and friends.

and again with the sensationalism....I'm asking you to stop with the personal insults. I won't accept them. You are being extremely extremely rude.

There's some epic white knighting going on in this thread

Jeremy didn't deny it though. He confirmed Chloe's version of events. It's his motivations which seem confused not that he actually did it.

They would have been checking with lawyers I would imagine.

I can see the NUTS headline and pics now

"This is what you would have seen Jeremy"

Jeezo.

You've gone from 'forcibly ' removing her robe to now ripping it off!! You do tend to 'over milk' some situations, don't you?

Sorry but why would I be eating my words? I'm not the gatekeeper of the nation's morals and I really don't care what people get up to or with whom as long as it's consensual and legal.

He didn't touch her boobs, Chloe didn't say that either.

Love this!

I'm not sure if you realise, but in your indignation you've simply contradicted yourself and made a number of gaffs.
As for your threatening tone to the FM... What are you going to do if they defy your instruction?
This issue is being over blown in the way Chloe overreacted.
Jeremy is not entitled to do what he did but the reaction from her was disproportionate.

And you seem to be doing that too. Overreacting I mean

BIB: Are you being serious? The fact that she was wearing a (very thick) robe means she was decently covered. It's like saying she shhouldn't have been walking round the house with nothing on under her dress/bikini/pyjamas - just how many layers of clothing do you think are necessary before a woman is decently dressed and therefore exempt from random men undressing her without her permission?

She also chose to be in the loo with him with nothing under her robe. You simply don't stay in a loo with a drunken fool with nothing on under your robe... !!!
He deserved a slap and that's about it.
I think some people need to really take a good look around the pubs and clubs, drunk men and women doing something stupid, being told to back off and the night goes on.
He's not a rapist monster, he's not someone who pinned her to a wall, he didn't open her robe full throttle, he didn't go for her crotch. None of those things so, the lesson here is, don't stay behind with a drunken fool and if you do and things go wrong think about what actually happened and talk it out or deck him one.

I would have thought considering how "liberal" she was on Ex on the Beach - she was used to people admiring her for her body and men grabbing stuff whilst she was on night's out doing her PA work. I don't think it is right HOWEVER I think her reaction was perfect for TV, let's just say that. I am sure she has given other drunken men a slapped face and walked away but there are headlines to be had now.

And we still don't know what position she was in when it happened. Jeremy said he thought she was flirting which is why he did it.

Consider the evidence: he did NOT 'forcefully' remove her clothing. He got it wrong - he opened her dressing gown. He said he did not fondle her breasts or touch her skin.
I'm not defending him because I like him but because he is being vilified unfairly. He may be a nut case for all I know but C5 took him on and then kicked out a man who appears emotionally vulnerable on public TV. I think people should take a long hard look at themselves if they think tonight's fiasco was acceptable.

The two situations are not at all comparable. Daley was really scary and threatened Hazel with actual physical violence. I know which of the two most women would have felt more capable of dealing with.

this sums up the whole thing very well imo

Why was it shown after the Watershed?

Well said.

so? she will have a story to sell, yes, doesnt mean she milked it or planned it.

I had a story to sell years ago, a victim of circumstance, i didnt milk it or over react at the time. It just happened.

Oh please I never said he touched her boobs..... Only that whatever happened during her time comforting him is that she left upset by what happened. I was actually defending her being upset and was by no means justifying jermanys treatment of her behind closed doors

I am serious, a bra and knickers or bikini should have been worn! I've lived in shared accommodation due to work and unless you're fresh out of the shower you got your underwear on etc.
Lets face it, they're on tv, cameras everywhere and leery drunken men. I personally wouldn't have been without my underwear.

He didn't do it - I don't believe - knowing she was naked. And considering he was so drunk he was throwing up, his judgment clearly wasn't good. Well, obviously.

But racist Ken stays?!?!?! Ermmmmm ok.