|
||||||||
So theres obviously cameras in the toilet to see how Jeremy groped Chloe |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11,776
|
Quote:
There is definitely a camera in the toilet for normal BB but was there a decision not to put cameras in there for CBB? Some posters seem to be saying there was but I can't recall. Does anyone have any definite information one way or the other so we can out this to bed once and for all.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 293
|
I doubt if there are cameras in toilets, but they all wear personal micro phones. BB has probably reviewed recordings including stuff that may have not heard on show and then made there decision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,433
|
Quote:
I'm pretty sure the celebs' contracts say they won't be filmed in the toilet. Whether that means there aren't any cameras or just that the footage isn't broadcast I don't know. I don't agree that they would have to have them for health and safety reasons. No other workplace requires that so it's a strange argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,586
|
Quote:
Has he admitted he touched her boob now then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,433
|
Quote:
His story was all over the place.
She on the other hand immediately said that he flipped her robe and got out her boob. However then in the diary room she said he opened her robe and exposed her boob. I think it is hard to say if he 'properly' touched it but he probably grazed it when opening the robe and even that is enough. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Pit of Despair
Posts: 50,183
|
Quote:
Yes it was. First of all he said he didn't touch or grope her. Then he said he barely touched her.
She on the other hand immediately said that he flipped her robe and got out her boob. However then in the diary room she said he opened her robe and exposed her boob. I think it is hard to say if he 'properly' touched it but he probably grazed it when opening the robe and even that is enough. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,209
|
Quote:
Not as far as I know. But no one is saying he did either.
They are accusing him of sexual assault which means for them to accuse him of that they must be saying he touched her boob?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 90,778
|
Quote:
Yes it was. First of all he said he didn't touch or grope her. Then he said he barely touched her.
She on the other hand immediately said that he flipped her robe and got out her boob. However then in the diary room she said he opened her robe and exposed her boob. I think it is hard to say if he 'properly' touched it but he probably grazed it when opening the robe and even that is enough. However, I think his story was all over the place for other reasons. At one point he even seemed to be saying he thought she might be flirting. Quote:
Legally just touching her clothing is enough. The intent was there to move her clothing to see what was underneath - it doesn't matter his reason or alleged reason, he wasn't invited to do so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 2,261
|
Quote:
she specifically said he pulled her boob out, if I recall correctly. Not that he pulled her robe and so her boob fell out.
Am willing to be corrected with actual footage. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 14,737
|
There is endless speculation about this but we didn't see what happened.
How can we really judge this scenario? It will always be her word against his. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,425
|
Quote:
he's an unreliable witness due to his intoxication. if there's no camera there's no way to prove what happened as its just his word against hers
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Left London
Posts: 19,882
|
People still saying he pulled her boob out?
All she said was he pulled on her robe and 'put' her boob out, clearly her boob fell out as he pulled on her robe. I'm pretty sure he also said he 'barely touched it' referring to the robe but I would have to go back and watch. It's disgusting how all the online papers and that tellymix etc have it described as groping or grabbing her boob and many, many posters on this forum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: under the sea
Posts: 443
|
Quote:
There is endless speculation about this but we didn't see what happened.
How can we really judge this scenario? It will always be her word against his. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 14,737
|
Quote:
but they gave the same story, what do you mean her word against his? he hasn't denied what he did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 18,890
|
Quote:
People still saying he pulled her boob out?
All she said was he pulled on her robe and 'put' her boob out, clearly her boob fell out as he pulled on her robe. I'm pretty sure he also said he 'barely touched it' referring to the robe but I would have to go back and watch. It's disgusting how all the online papers and that tellymix etc have it described as groping or grabbing her boob and many, many posters on this forum. ![]() It was clear to me that her Boob Fell out from the tugging her gown aside as opposed to him literally pulling it out with his hands
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,010
|
He should not have touched her dressing gown even if he thought she had a bikini on or not. She went in there to help him not to be touched up. She said straight away she wasn't comfortable with what he did before she walked out of the toilet, and she had every right to be upset.
He over stepped the mark, he might not of intentionally meant to scare her but he did and I hope he gets the help he needs to over come his problems as he seems to be very troubled. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: under the sea
Posts: 443
|
Quote:
His two opposing statements would suggest that the man was too drunk to recall clearly what actually happened. The point is did he do it deliberately thinking it was OK to make a pass at her? Or was he just so drunk he didn't know what he was doing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,586
|
Quote:
There are plenty of people on here in other threads saying he did!!
They are accusing him of sexual assault which means for them to accuse him of that they must be saying he touched her boob?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,713
|
Quote:
They must do as producers wouldnt know how the groping happened. I think there is a camera in there for just the producers to see
If they were to have a camera in the toilets then the producers would see the HM's doing both number 1's and number 2's and pleasuring themselves Don't think that would work
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,209
|
Quote:
Are they? I'd have thought voyeurism was the nearest offence given that he didn't touch her breast. There was no offence committed IMO but I'm no lawyer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,409
|
OP has her own camera in there and saw groping, apparently, when even the victim didn't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,191
|
Quote:
Jeremy admitted it
If they were to have a camera in the toilets then the producers would see the HM's doing both number 1's and number 2's and pleasuring themselves Don't think that would work ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hello Summer, Goodbye
Posts: 3,385
|
Is everyone forgetting Katie's epilepsy?
I'd be astonished if they didn't have cameras in there. It would be massively negligent of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
|
Quote:
I think a camera must be in that toilet and BB producers saw the footage and thats why he got ejected
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 472
|
Quote:
Jeremy admitted it
If they were to have a camera in the toilets then the producers would see the HM's doing both number 1's and number 2's and pleasuring themselves Don't think that would work ![]() Also there was something about the way the BB lady spoke about what happened (to Jeremy when he was being chucked out) which suggests that she had seen it. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:13.




It was clear to me that her Boob Fell out from the tugging her gown aside as opposed to him literally pulling it out with his hands