• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Should BB still be seen as some sort of social commentary?
Maggie 55
12-01-2015
Should BB still be seen as some sort of social commentary?

When BB was introduced it was seen as a kind of social experiment to see how completely diverse people with conflicting views would interact together when they could not just walk away.

it was accepted that people, including viewers, would be offended by other people views.

Now it appears different no housemate it seems is allowed to express opinions that are not currently acceptable to most, if so they are to be warned or evicted.

.Presumably the housemates are to be presented as some sort of 'Stepford Wives' where everything is calm and untroubled.

We don't follow this through on news or documentary programmes where individuals are seen and heard expressing some absolutely barbaric, anti social, and aggressive views. Broadcasters seem to feel that adults should be allowed to hear this so that they are informed about what is going on in the wider world outside their own perceptions and views.

BB is different now from a show showing real reality and views it is reduced to just what the broadcaster insists they do and say.

This can be difficult. For instance Ken was old and his 'negro' comment meant what?

That he was a fan of Martin Luther King or a deliberate racist? The acceptability of that word has kept on changing under Ken's feet over the years.


"The word "Negro" is used in the English-speaking world to refer to a person of black ancestry or appearance. Negro denotes "black" in Spanish and Portuguese, derived from the ancient Latin word, niger, "black", which itself is probably from a Proto-Indo-European root *nekw-, "to be dark", akin to *nokw-, "night".

"Negro" superseded "coloured" as the most polite terminology at a time when "black" was more offensive. This usage was accepted as normal, including by people classified as Negroes, until the later Civil Rights movement in the late 1960s. One well-known example is the identification by Martin Luther King, Jr. of his own race as "Negro" in his famous 1963 speech I Have a Dream.

The term "Negro" is still used in some historical contexts, such as in the name of the United Negro College Fund and the Negro league in sports.

The United States Census Bureau announced that "Negro" would be included on the 2010 United States Census, alongside "Black" and "African-American", because some older black Americans still self-identify with the term.
"

So do people prefer this sanitised, controlled programme or would they prefer the original concept. That does not mean people should have carte blanche with their behaviour there needs to be limits, just as news and documentarty progrrammes have their limits just that that we should wind our sensitivity levels down a bit to have a
better idea of how people really behave.



Maggie
chackalacka1234
12-01-2015
Could not have put it better myself. How can we learn from each other, if everything is censored.
SegaGamer
12-01-2015
I would love it if nobody was kicked out over anything. I am yet to be offended by anything i have ever seen on Big Brother. To be honest i don't think i have ever taken offense to anything in my life.
Penfolds_place
12-01-2015
It's not been about social commentary for years. It's about people trying to get their 15 minutes of fame and for washed up celebrities to raise their profiles.
Diabolus
12-01-2015
Absolutely yes.

The social commentary these days however is more in how people in the outside world react to the housemates and certain behaviours/ incidents. Some of what i have seen (and I am not just talking about on here btw) is shocking.

When you see some of the pretty nasty comments made about a woman who has the temerity to have once posed topless or dared to wear a tightly fitted bathrobe with no underwear thinking she'd be safe from having some bloke randomly open her clothes as and when he feels like it, I'd say the need for social commentary is more vital than ever.

For me, this is far more interesting than the housemates themselves.
Maggie 55
12-01-2015
The thing is that by evicting people who are displaying generally held to be unacceptable views and actions BB is actually helping them.

People like Jade, Danielle Lloyd, and Jo O'meara had a very hard time of it from the public on being voted out.

Didn't exactly enhance the publics view of Cleo Rocos, Leo Sayer, George Galloway and Lee Ryan either.




Maggie
JVS
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by Maggie 55:
“People like Jade, Danielle Lloyd, and Jo O'meara had a very hard time of it from the public on being voted out.
”

Jade wasn't voted out.
Maggie 55
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by JVS:
“Jade wasn't voted out.”

Course she was, in a head to head vote against Shilpa Shetty.




Maggie
dd68
12-01-2015
I think the social thing has been done, it's about something else now
Maggie 55
12-01-2015
Originally Posted by dd68:
“I think the social thing has been done, it's about something else now”

Yep well on the way to just being another scripted reality show, where the producers set up the situations to be played out within the rules of the show.





Maggie.
Fried Kickin
12-01-2015
It's cheap tabloid pap.
Mastes1
12-01-2015
The show isn't a social experiment anymore though, its more of a TOWIE style scripted game show complete with gimmicks and twists.

Imo the show was much better when it was simply a bunch of people put in a house and the cameras observing them 24/7. Very few gimmicks, no silly music montages etc.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map