Poor Emma, she may not have a live eviction show to present unless they put in more housemates .
At this rate there will be no need to evict anyone.
At this rate there will be no need to evict anyone.
Perez issued with warning ..
2 of 2
Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“I bet you anything that the programme will be introduced by Marcus in a sensationalised way.
The point being that BB make out that they take such incidents seriously, but at the same time hypocritically promote them with a hard sell like a boxing promoter before a boxing match to get more people to watch.”
“I bet you anything that the programme will be introduced by Marcus in a sensationalised way.
The point being that BB make out that they take such incidents seriously, but at the same time hypocritically promote them with a hard sell like a boxing promoter before a boxing match to get more people to watch.”
The warnings yesterday were a whole lot more exciting than the show.
Originally Posted by missfrizzy:
“What happened to the "free speech" malarkey, even if you're being offensive. The World was marching for it on the same day the Ken was thrown out, and Perez was warned about it.
”
“What happened to the "free speech" malarkey, even if you're being offensive. The World was marching for it on the same day the Ken was thrown out, and Perez was warned about it.
”
Je suis Ken!
”
Quote:
“Keith Chegwin takes a backseat to all of the drama and notes that when you leave Ken alone, he just does his own thing and doesn’t cause anyone a problem”
“Keith Chegwin takes a backseat to all of the drama and notes that when you leave Ken alone, he just does his own thing and doesn’t cause anyone a problem”
Yes Nadia.
Originally Posted by Vesna:
“You seem to have a bit of confusion. Channel 5 is a free to air broadcast channel that has to abide by broadcasting standards in order to retain their licence.
Contestants are well briefed on the broadcast standards also known as rules by which the show has to abide in order to stay in business.
If contestants are too stupid to follow the simple set of rules they are given that's not the fault of viewers.
Perhaps people who prefer to see racists, homophobes, misogynists and other such unsavory characters and behaviours should get cable, where the standards are different. Perhaps a season of Sarah Palin shooting animals from a helicopter or Honey Boo Boo or Duck Dynasty are more suited. All those shows are cable produced and star seriously offensive, ignorant and hateful individuals.”
“You seem to have a bit of confusion. Channel 5 is a free to air broadcast channel that has to abide by broadcasting standards in order to retain their licence.
Contestants are well briefed on the broadcast standards also known as rules by which the show has to abide in order to stay in business.
If contestants are too stupid to follow the simple set of rules they are given that's not the fault of viewers.
Perhaps people who prefer to see racists, homophobes, misogynists and other such unsavory characters and behaviours should get cable, where the standards are different. Perhaps a season of Sarah Palin shooting animals from a helicopter or Honey Boo Boo or Duck Dynasty are more suited. All those shows are cable produced and star seriously offensive, ignorant and hateful individuals.”
And any one who wants to see a sanitized and unrealistic situation can watch as someone else sais, songs of praise.
Anyone wanting to see a mix people with different backgrounds and view and watch it unfold in the bed way possible should be able to see it on a show of this format.
Perez is such a nasty person, he needs to tone himself down a bit or else he will be either ejected or voted out very soon.
In the next nominations, I will be very surprised if he isn't up (assuming BB doesn't mess with them which is very unlikely).
In the next nominations, I will be very surprised if he isn't up (assuming BB doesn't mess with them which is very unlikely).
Originally Posted by ryanr554:
“Perez is such a nasty person, he needs to tone himself down a bit or else he will be either ejected or voted out very soon.
In the next nominations, I will be very surprised if he isn't up (assuming BB doesn't mess with them which is very unlikely).”
“Perez is such a nasty person, he needs to tone himself down a bit or else he will be either ejected or voted out very soon.
In the next nominations, I will be very surprised if he isn't up (assuming BB doesn't mess with them which is very unlikely).”
I will be surprised if the whole house doesn't nom him ...:
Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“I bet you anything that the programme will be introduced by Marcus in a sensationalised way.”
“I bet you anything that the programme will be introduced by Marcus in a sensationalised way.”
Yep, something along the lines :
Please be aware the show contains adult themes, adult conversation, adult words but behaviour pertinent to a three year old.
Originally Posted by EvieJ:
“And any one who wants to see a sanitized and unrealistic situation can watch as someone else sais, songs of praise.
Anyone wanting to see a mix people with different backgrounds and view and watch it unfold in the bed way possible should be able to see it on a show of this format.”
“And any one who wants to see a sanitized and unrealistic situation can watch as someone else sais, songs of praise.
Anyone wanting to see a mix people with different backgrounds and view and watch it unfold in the bed way possible should be able to see it on a show of this format.”
This really is why they need the live feed. In the US version, all of this kind of stuff goes out online, uncensored, but gets prettied up for the broadcast show to meet the requirements of their broadcast license. People who watch the live feeds, or read the summaries of them posted online, are in the know of the worst of the hm's. People who choose to only watch the broadcast show can go on pretending they're all nice, pleasant hm's who occasionally get drunk, have sex, or argue in a Kat approved Happy House.
There's no pressure to try and re-edit all these things to look better or worse than they really were, then censor them for tv. They just are, and people judge them with as much or as little info as they choose to receive.
Maybe this is big brothers new strategy. Kick everyone out before they get evicted so they can choose the winner!
He wasn't issued with a warning, he was just told not to say a certain something. Warnings are what was given to Ken.
Originally Posted by EvieJ:
“And any one who wants to see a sanitized and unrealistic situation can watch as someone else sais, songs of praise.
Anyone wanting to see a mix people with different backgrounds and view and watch it unfold in the bed way possible should be able to see it on a show of this format.”
“And any one who wants to see a sanitized and unrealistic situation can watch as someone else sais, songs of praise.
Anyone wanting to see a mix people with different backgrounds and view and watch it unfold in the bed way possible should be able to see it on a show of this format.”
No anyone who has an employer has to abide by the CONDITIONS of that employment.
It's not a complex concept but it does appear to go over many's heads.
Anyone who owns a free to air broadcast channel and wants to keep their licence has to abide by the broadcast standards or rules set by that industries governing body.
If broadcast standards of free to air channels aren't to suit there are pay stations that have more appropriate shows like Duck Dynasty or Honey Boo Boo for people with lower standards than those set forth for free to air channels.
Originally Posted by ryanr554:
“Perez is such a nasty person, he needs to tone himself down a bit or else he will be either ejected or voted out very soon.
In the next nominations, I will be very surprised if he isn't up (assuming BB doesn't mess with them which is very unlikely).”
“Perez is such a nasty person, he needs to tone himself down a bit or else he will be either ejected or voted out very soon.
In the next nominations, I will be very surprised if he isn't up (assuming BB doesn't mess with them which is very unlikely).”
His hysterics over Jeremy was ludicrous, and then how he behaved on last nights show, either illustrates how unhinged HE is, or how desperate for attention he is, when all the attention has been elsewhere.
Originally Posted by Flight815-23D:
“This really is why they need the live feed. In the US version, all of this kind of stuff goes out online, uncensored, but gets prettied up for the broadcast show to meet the requirements of their broadcast license. People who watch the live feeds, or read the summaries of them posted online, are in the know of the worst of the hm's. People who choose to only watch the broadcast show can go on pretending they're all nice, pleasant hm's who occasionally get drunk, have sex, or argue in a Kat approved Happy House.
There's no pressure to try and re-edit all these things to look better or worse than they really were, then censor them for tv. They just are, and people judge them with as much or as little info as they choose to receive.”
“This really is why they need the live feed. In the US version, all of this kind of stuff goes out online, uncensored, but gets prettied up for the broadcast show to meet the requirements of their broadcast license. People who watch the live feeds, or read the summaries of them posted online, are in the know of the worst of the hm's. People who choose to only watch the broadcast show can go on pretending they're all nice, pleasant hm's who occasionally get drunk, have sex, or argue in a Kat approved Happy House.
There's no pressure to try and re-edit all these things to look better or worse than they really were, then censor them for tv. They just are, and people judge them with as much or as little info as they choose to receive.”
CBS did get a lot of flack and were much more careful with their casting after the season of hate.
Now Utopia that was a live feed!
Originally Posted by Vesna:
“No anyone who has an employer has to abide by the CONDITIONS of that employment.
It's not a complex concept but it does appear to go over many's heads.
Anyone who owns a free to air broadcast channel and wants to keep their licence has to abide by the broadcast standards or rules set by that industries governing body.
If broadcast standards of free to air channels aren't to suit there are pay stations that have more appropriate shows like Duck Dynasty or Honey Boo Boo for people with lower standards than those set forth for free to air channels.”
“No anyone who has an employer has to abide by the CONDITIONS of that employment.
It's not a complex concept but it does appear to go over many's heads.
Anyone who owns a free to air broadcast channel and wants to keep their licence has to abide by the broadcast standards or rules set by that industries governing body.
If broadcast standards of free to air channels aren't to suit there are pay stations that have more appropriate shows like Duck Dynasty or Honey Boo Boo for people with lower standards than those set forth for free to air channels.”
As its still being aired I suggest it is abiding by those requirements. And don't forget, those "lower than YOUR standard" programmes also have an audience. Not everyone's taste but we have a choice. As we do with big brother.
Originally Posted by Heartache:
“His hysterics over Jeremy was ludicrous, and then how he behaved on last nights show, either illustrates how unhinged HE is, or how desperate for attention he is, when all the attention has been elsewhere.”
“His hysterics over Jeremy was ludicrous, and then how he behaved on last nights show, either illustrates how unhinged HE is, or how desperate for attention he is, when all the attention has been elsewhere.”
He behaved like a spoilt child.
Originally Posted by Heartache:
“His hysterics over Jeremy was ludicrous, and then how he behaved on last nights show, either illustrates how unhinged HE is, or how desperate for attention he is, when all the attention has been elsewhere.”
“His hysterics over Jeremy was ludicrous, and then how he behaved on last nights show, either illustrates how unhinged HE is, or how desperate for attention he is, when all the attention has been elsewhere.”
Good point.
2 of 2
