• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Interview with Katie Hopkins in The Guardian...very interesting
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
Scarlet O'Hara
17-01-2015
Originally Posted by zebedee63:
“Why are snobs who view a whole class of people as inferior any different from racists who view a whole race of people as inferior. Her elitest attitudes should be unacceptable
in any society that wants move forward in a fairer more just world.”

I'm not sure. I was gonna say because there's no history of oppression like there is with...but that'd clearly be stoopid.

Genuinely don't know. Cos working classes aren't a minority, maybe? Cos there isn't a history of violence specifically targeted against the working class simply BECAUSE they're working class?

Good question.
An Thropologist
17-01-2015
Interesting point Zebedee.

Am I not right in thinking that when Zebedee arrives with some sage words that heralds "Time for bed"
too_much_coffee
17-01-2015
Originally Posted by dialectic:
“If this is true

I'd say she is a lot older than she says she is. This was a practice that the nuns and priests did but would have ceased to do at the time Katie was at school (if she is truthful about her age)

She must be at least 60”

The practice was still happening in the 70s as I can remember a nun doing just that to one of our class.


Originally Posted by cazziekay:
“Maybe Katie elevated herself into the elite class. As the article reads she seemed to have an ordinary life. Catholic School education is a strict environment and especially in comparison to the Comprehensives but she's describing a time when my mother went to school so clearly not true.

It could all be part of her fake persona that she has created for herself. We just assumed she had this upper class background by the 'them and us' rhetoric she uses and wants us to believe.

It's just a thought as she doesn't seem to have any ideas of her own she just goes with what the Conservatives and media are pushing down the publics throats and then takes it to another level to get noticed.
And it's worked. So yea I think it's all fake and more working class than upper class



I agree. I went to Catholic School and I am older than her (though she looks closer to my age than the age she is claiming) and nothing like that went on. It was strict but not barbaric.”

Private schools have a habit of instilling a sense of superiority and entitlement in their pupils. (glad that I was expelled )

She cannot be blamed for a private education as it was her parents choice and they probably sacrificed quite a bit to pay for two daughters to be privately educated. She can be blamed for how she allowed it to give her certain attitudes.

Originally Posted by psy7ch:
“"Yes - I am a sociopath"

by Katie Hopkins


http://katiehopkins-apprentice.blogs...sociopath.html”

That actually makes me feel a little warmer towards her as she is quite self deprecating.

Originally Posted by zebedee63:
“Why are snobs who view a whole class of people as inferior any different from racists who view a whole race of people as inferior. Her elitest attitudes should be unacceptable
in any society that wants move forward in a fairer more just world.”

They certainly should and private schools should also be banned. They are a breeding ground for those who feel that they can judge, belittle and scorn those educated in the state sector. You only have to look at those in parliament to see the worst of the public v state school argument.
Scarlet O'Hara
17-01-2015
Originally Posted by An Thropologist:
“Interesting point Zebedee.

Am I not right in thinking that when Zebedee arrives with some sage words that heralds "Time for bed" ”

I hope not. I haven't even started on my Chablis yet.
too_much_coffee
17-01-2015
Originally Posted by Scarlet O'Hara:
“I hope not. I haven't even started on my Chablis yet. ”

But possibly an excuse for some hot chocolate
dialectic
17-01-2015
Originally Posted by too_much_coffee:
“The practice was still happening in the 70s as I can remember a nun doing just that to one of our class..”

I guess someone could have reported her, though they were probably still scary times with scary nuns
diesels hummin
17-01-2015
Comments about being prepared to barbecue her children to get ahead show that nothing she says can be taken seriously, and that she is just a professional controversialist ,nothing more
too_much_coffee
17-01-2015
Originally Posted by diesels hummin:
“Comments about being prepared to barbecue her children to get ahead show that nothing she says can be taken seriously, and that she is just a professional controversialist ,nothing more”

You may see it like that but others are currently reporting her to the police for canabalism...
Sasparella
17-01-2015
I don't think she's a sociopath, I think the way she is is all to do with her epileptic fits and the damage that they can do to the brain. I have worked with two people over the years that developed fits in their twenties and they are both very much like her, very little empathy for others and think that what they say is always right. They both changed so much from when I first met them, from being happy go lucky normal type people, they both became rather self obsessed and had very little interest in other's feelings or thoughts. Unfortunately the lady is no longer with us as she had diabetes too, and had an epileptic fit where she knocked herself out and then went into a diabetic coma which she didn't recover from as she wasn't found for 3 days after. However she always comes to mind when I watch Katie H, she hated to appear weak to anyone else too and would sometimes say the most outrageous things and couldn't see why we thought they were outrageous. I still work with the other one who is male and he gets worse every year which can be very wearing, but I remind myself that he can't help it, every time he has another fit more braincells get damaged. Funnily enough they both also looked/look a lot older than they actually were/are. I am not professing to be a doctor, just making observations of what I have noticed over the years, of two people I have worked closely with that have the same as Katie H does.
o0Autumn0o
17-01-2015
She's someone who has a gob, makes money by saying what a majority of the media is pushing, like at the moment fat people, and benefits. It's an easy target subject to hone in on.

I wouldnt pin sociopath or psychopath on anyone, it's more someone likes the attention be it good or bad. Its human nature for many to want to be the forefront and on that soapbox.

I see the reality TV shows with people just like her, but in a different way. It's sad really, she is a sad woman, that will make money, people will pay her, and the more people argue against her, whilst some take her side, she will in theory have a career for a long while yet.

I cannot stand her, purely on the basis, she's fake, with her intellect and her rent a gob attitude.
dialectic
17-01-2015
Originally Posted by zebedee63:
“Why are snobs who view a whole class of people as inferior any different from racists who view a whole race of people as inferior. Her elitest attitudes should be unacceptable
in any society that wants move forward in a fairer more just world.”

I think her views are wholly unacceptable and, as far as she pushes it, there are similarities to racism.
The obvious difference of the elitist snob to the racist is that the racist discriminates against a swathe of the population based on an unalterable fact : the colour of their skin.This is wholly unacceptable and always will be.

Some people (social snobs) feel free to discriminate against the lesser off because they believe they are where they are because they are lazy and unambitious, that their status is not an unalterable fact and they are free to bootstrap themselves out of there, a la 'social mobility.' Unfortunately, the, what look like easy, solutions: educational opportunities and social supports are not always available or, because of grinding poverty ,not sought with confidence. A lot of snobs, I suspect, are so because they are aspirational and want to separate themselves from more humble origins.(There is a bit of that in Katie).

Katie does not even allow for' social mobility,' in that she believes it is more efficient to have a system that keeps everybody in their place. I get the impression (from that article) that her views are that the brightest are among the elites anyway, so most of the lower classes are, by design, thick. That comes close to a racist type mindset towards class really.

By design, a capitalist system functions by benefiting some over many, as long as it fools us in to thinking that everyone can benefit , like the 'American Dream'.
In reality it is more akin to how Katie says it is:the better schooled, the ones who have doors open for them and those who are already wealthy maintain the balance of power. So she is not lying (in that is the way things mostly are. Her saying aloud that this system is desirable and most 'efficient' sounds a bit fascist. (it's not the smartest thing to say either)

I think it was Scarlet who mentioned above that there isn't specifically a history of violence with regards to the lower classes, as comparable to certain races. True in the direct sense of the word but a system that goes from boom to bust while simultaneously making a few richer on the back of the misery of the many at the bottom who through bearing the brunt of recession, unstable employment, unfair pay, crippling economic problems and subsequently evictions, poverty ,mental illness, suicide, etc.... are oppressed by a violent system. IMO anyway

Katie and her ilk, however, see this as efficiency.

I
Scarlet O'Hara
17-01-2015
Originally Posted by Sasparella:
“I don't think she's a sociopath, I think the way she is is all to do with her epileptic fits and the damage that they can do to the brain. I have worked with two people over the years that developed fits in their twenties and they are both very much like her, very little empathy for others and think that what they say is always right. They both changed so much from when I first met them, from being happy go lucky normal type people, they both became rather self obsessed and had very little interest in other's feelings or thoughts. Unfortunately the lady is no longer with us as she had diabetes too, and had an epileptic fit where she knocked herself out and then went into a diabetic coma which she didn't recover from as she wasn't found for 3 days after. However she always comes to mind when I watch Katie H, she hated to appear weak to anyone else too and would sometimes say the most outrageous things and couldn't see why we thought they were outrageous. I still work with the other one who is male and he gets worse every year which can be very wearing, but I remind myself that he can't help it, every time he has another fit more braincells get damaged. Funnily enough they both also looked/look a lot older than they actually were/are. I am not professing to be a doctor, just making observations of what I have noticed over the years, of two people I have worked closely with that have the same as Katie H does.”

That's a really interesting perspective. I don't know much about epilepsy and its potential impact on behaviour/cognition/emotions, etc. My only experience was someone in my immediate family and it's gone now, no permanent damage.

Your anecdote about that woman is really sad.
Sasparella
17-01-2015
Originally Posted by Scarlet O'Hara:
“That's a really interesting perspective. I don't know much about epilepsy and its potential impact on behaviour/cognition/emotions, etc. My only experience was someone in my immediate family and it's gone now, no permanent damage.

Your anecdote about that woman is really sad. ”

Yes it was sad, she lived alone after her parents died, although she had one of those medic alert things in her flat, but she had the fit and went into the diabetic coma after going home on the Friday, and wasn't found until the Monday when our boss went to check on her when she didn't turn up for work. By that time pneumonia had also set in and she died a couple of days later in hospital.
Desy Boy
17-01-2015
Dude I called it. She thinks that being a man means being self-centred, unyielding, cruel and unsympathetic at your core. So she has taken on that persona to cover up her own perceived weaknesses until the point that she lives by preset rules and no emotional ones.

She has re-wired herself to become what she admires, a man. Someone opposite of a nun. But in real terms she doesn't understand that whilst men commonly don't show those emotions we do have them. We are expected to be decisive but that doesn't mean we don't utilise emotional thought in our decisions.

She thinks she's becoming one of the lads when in fact she's becoming one of the psychos. But at her core is simply a boring simpleton with a tougher suit of armour to prevent that from being exposed.

I liken it to an 'Uncle Tom' figure who spends their life mimicking the perceived actions and mentality of their masters whilst sneering at the ones who are actually most like her. She's not above the fray as she has clearly demonstrated in this house. She is the fray.

She needs to understand that yes there is a pressure on men to be decisive and firm, but that doesn't simply translate to being ****.
dialectic
17-01-2015
Originally Posted by Desy Boy:
“Dude I called it. She thinks that being a man means being self-centred, unyielding, cruel and unsympathetic at your core. So she has taken on that persona to cover up her own perceived weaknesses until the point that she lives by preset rules and no emotional ones.

She has re-wired herself to become what she admires, a man. Someone opposite of a nun. But in real terms she doesn't understand that whilst men commonly don't show those emotions we do have them. We are expected to be decisive but that doesn't mean we don't utilise emotional thought in our decisions.

She thinks she's becoming one of the lads when in fact she's becoming one of the psychos. But at her core is simply a boring simpleton with a tougher suit of armour to prevent that from being exposed.

I liken it to an 'Uncle Tom' figure who spends their life mimicking the perceived actions and mentality of their masters whilst sneering at the ones who are actually most like her. She's not above the fray as she has clearly demonstrated in this house. She is the fray.

She needs to understand that yes there is a pressure on men to be decisive and firm, but that doesn't simply translate to being ****.”

Whoa.. you may have had a point in there in recognizing that Katie likes to assume a masculine type persona -she has said this herself and describes herself and certain other females as having 'balls' - but when you get to the BIB are you comparing the male -female difference to a master-slave analogy. I assure you men are no more women's masters than white people are, or ever were, masters to black people.
Your use of 'masters' is so misplaced and I hope it's a mistake on your part.
I assure you, also, that women are excellent when it comes to being decisive and firm.
Desy Boy
17-01-2015
Originally Posted by dialectic:
“Whoa.. you may have had a point in there in recognizing that Katie likes to assume a masculine type persona -she has said this herself and describes herself and certain other females as having 'balls' - but when you get to the BIB are you comparing the male -female difference to a master-slave analogy. I assure you men are no more women's masters than white people are, or ever, were masters to black people.
Your use of 'masters' is so misplaced and I hope it's a mistake on your part.
I assure you, also, that women are excellent when it comes to being decisive and firm.”

Sorry I didn't mean it that way as in that how it supposed to be. No more than I believe that white people are superior masters to black people. However there has been a perception over the ages that women are chattels of men. Some people still kind of subscribe to that notion even in the most subtle ways.
dialectic
17-01-2015
Originally Posted by Desy Boy:
“Sorry I didn't mean it that way as in that how it supposed to be. No more than I believe that white people are superior masters to black people. However there has been a perception over the ages that women are chattels of men. Some people still kind of subscribe to that notion even in the most subtle ways.”

LOL now you are just decisively and firmly digging yourself a bigger hole. Good luck with that one!
AMS13
17-01-2015
Originally Posted by calamity:
“she said she took it at twenty.”

I have temporal lobe epilepsy, which was diagnosed when I was in my early-forties. It was caused by head injuries following a few accidents (I was/am accident prone). A friend of mine, was diagnosed with epilepsy, following a road traffic accident and in her late thirties. As others have said, there are so many types, and more than one cause. There is a lot of ignorance associated with the illness and as others have said, there is still a lot for the neurologist to discover.
momoriro
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by dialectic:
“I think her views are wholly unacceptable and, as far as she pushes it, there are similarities to racism.
The obvious difference of the elitist snob to the racist is that the racist discriminates against a swathe of the population based on an unalterable fact : the colour of their skin.This is wholly unacceptable and always will be.

Some people (social snobs) feel free to discriminate against the lesser off because they believe they are where they are because they are lazy and unambitious, that their status is not an unalterable fact and they are free to bootstrap themselves out of there, a la 'social mobility.' Unfortunately, the, what look like easy, solutions: educational opportunities and social supports are not always available or, because of grinding poverty ,not sought with confidence. A lot of snobs, I suspect, are so because they are aspirational and want to separate themselves from more humble origins.(There is a bit of that in Katie).

Katie does not even allow for' social mobility,' in that she believes it is more efficient to have a system that keeps everybody in their place. I get the impression (from that article) that her views are that the brightest are among the elites anyway, so most of the lower classes are, by design, thick. That comes close to a racist type mindset towards class really.

By design, a capitalist system functions by benefiting some over many, as long as it fools us in to thinking that everyone can benefit , like the 'American Dream'.
In reality it is more akin to how Katie says it is:the better schooled, the ones who have doors open for them and those who are already wealthy maintain the balance of power. So she is not lying (in that is the way things mostly are. Her saying aloud that this system is desirable and most 'efficient' sounds a bit fascist. (it's not the smartest thing to say either)

I think it was Scarlet who mentioned above that there isn't specifically a history of violence with regards to the lower classes, as comparable to certain races. True in the direct sense of the word but a system that goes from boom to bust while simultaneously making a few richer on the back of the misery of the many at the bottom who through bearing the brunt of recession, unstable employment, unfair pay, crippling economic problems and subsequently evictions, poverty ,mental illness, suicide, etc.... are oppressed by a violent system. IMO anyway

Katie and her ilk, however, see this as efficiency.

I”

Love this post, brilliant well said.
Crazyeyeskiller
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by hansue:
“I cringe at a lot of her comments generally but she does say a lot of things I, and many others, agree with but don't have the guts to say. Sometimes she has a good point to make but it is the nasty way she says it that upset people.”

Yeh agree, she definitely had a good point once - answers on a postcard if anyone can remember what it was or when it happened. Thanks
Crazyeyeskiller
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by Nosaer:
“In some ways I get Katie. I don't think she is a sociopath or anywhere near it, but has a strong ability in her thinking to detach from emotion and see things in the cold light of day. Perhaps this trait would be more acceptable to more emotionally driven souls if she sugar coated it but I find it appealing because you know exactly where you stand with Katie.”

She couldn't be more of a sociopath if she tried - and by god she tries.
Crazyeyeskiller
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by Scarlet O'Hara:
“Ordinarily, yes. What it seems to have done is endorsed her view that if she can deal with stuff, everyone can deal with stuff.

It's so small-minded though... the idea that dealing with one (admittedly difficult) illness or enjoying the insults of a drill sergeant is proof that people can be tough in the face of adversity, without ever having walked in the uniquely different shoes of the people she derides.”



Correct - she's quite a dunce really when it comes to thinking any of her opinions through to the end.

Empathy to her is probably a swear word.
purplesky99
18-01-2015
Honestly, I can't even be bothered to try and analyse her, she means that little to me. I dislike her immensely, but that means nothing to her, and my energy has better uses in the world..
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map