Oh I do hope they don't. Hopefully Hopkin's husband has more sense.

Yep. I think Cami's Bear should be taken into protective custody for his own safety.

Seriously though, whilst many will say Poerez deserved it, it was clearly inflammatory on Katie's part and as it was a fixture and fitting, vandalizing it was against Big Brothers rules. But instead of reprimanding her, they invite her out of the argument to calm down so she didn't do something to get herself kicked out. Or at least that is what it felt like to me.

The poor bunny is a symbol of Katie's abusive nature .

Look at the end of the day Perez has been taunting people and pushing they're buttons. It doesn't take a genius to know that Perez loved that f***ing rabbit for some odd reason. She wanted to bother him so she did.

Oh, you never know with him.

His agent put him up to it - newspaper deal in the bag.

If, as Katie implied, Perez was using it to be sexually provocative and aiming that harassment directly at Alexander - I'd have done the same.

But somehow his massive ego got through customs.

Nardia can tell us what bunny thinks.

So, we all think BB = big bottler?

If someone else had broken the rabbit, would they have been punished?

He's not the only one who has lost their head in there.

What is it with bunnies and vengeful women?

Boom boom

Exactly. It's staggering that there are posters that stick up for one over the other, both vile immature human beings.

It depends on who did it. On BB the reactions to acts and words/insults depend solely on who the person is doing/saying the things, not exactly what they were doing/saying. It's all a bunch of hypocrisy but what can you do?

I remember a few years ago there was a "Blame Index" on here. That got things spot on.

after seeing his antics in the garden the other night Im worried about just how much lovin he was giving that poor bunny

He'd do anything for a magazine deal. The only showmance we're going to get this series.