• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Tuesday's Eviction Cancelled
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
Scarlet O'Hara
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by hoppyuppy:
“Chill a bit. BB can't cancel Tuesday, it is just a TV show. You need to take time to get back to reality.”

Ummm, what?
hoppyuppy
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by Scarlet O'Hara:
“Ummm, what?”

OK, if you are that slow:

It is not within the power of Big Brother to cancel Tuesday, it is still going to happen.

This isn't 1984.

Der.
benbeez1
18-01-2015
on the plus side no £'s for Channel 5 from the votes
SillyBillyGoat
18-01-2015
I don't see why. They should have less in the finale anyway, I think.
Hyram Fyram
18-01-2015
It's getting to be a strain for C5 to keep making out that this shambles is actually still a coherent show. They'd be wise to forget the idea of getting anyone else in, concentrating on the people already there and wrap it all up asap.
KT_Dog
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by hoppyuppy:
“It is not within the power of Big Brother to cancel Tuesday,”

Isn't it Hoppy? ISN'T-- ...oh no, hang on, I've done that one already haven't I?
Sexbomb
18-01-2015
Big Brother is going down the pan, time to scrap it i think.
hoppyuppy
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by Hyram Fyram:
“It's getting to be a strain for C5 to keep making out that this shambles is actually still a coherent show. They'd be wise to forget the idea of getting anyone else in, concentrating on the people already there and wrap it all up asap.”

They should just hand out boxing gloves at this stage. Then Callum could win, or Michelle.
Scarlet O'Hara
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by hoppyuppy:
“OK, if you are that slow:

It is not within the power of Big Brother to cancel Tuesday, it is still going to happen.

This isn't 1984.

Der.”

Yeah, still not understanding why you quoted my post since I'm one of the only people in the thread who didn't seem to care much.

But thanks anyway for reminding me what year it isn't. I'd lost track.
Kasper69
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by Aaron_Scotland:
“But they broke rules they agreed to follow when signing the contract, surely cant get paid for that?!”

according to Jeremy he and Ken still get paid.
hoppyuppy
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by Scarlet O'Hara:
“Yeah, still not understanding why you quoted my post since I'm one of the only people in the thread who didn't seem to care much.

But thanks anyway for reminding me what year it isn't. I'd lost track.”

No worries.
striing
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by josha19:
“Nope, the only way any celebrity is paid their fee is if they win or are evicted. If they decide to walk or are ejected for breaking the rules, they don't receive a penny. It's stipulated in their contract. Therefore, Jeremy, Ken, and Alexander won't receive their dues for appearing on the show.

I know this because I remember back on CBB6 when Mutya was seriously contemplating about leaving and stated that she didn't care about the money; she wanted to leave if she wasn't evicted the night Tina was voted out.”

Surely they would have to pay them for the time/work they have done? Even if you get fired from work and/or quit you get paid for the work done.
hoppyuppy
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by striing:
“Surely they would have to pay them for the time/work they have done? Even if you get fired from work and/or quit you get paid for the work done.”

Not in Camerons Britain.
striing
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by hoppyuppy:
“Not in Camerons Britain.”

What do you mean?
hoppyuppy
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by striing:
“What do you mean?”

We are all in it together, if you quit, you lose your pay.

Very simmppplles.
Alrightmate
18-01-2015
This series is a mess.
Speckled_Hen
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by Blondie X:
“Translation - we were scared Perez or Katie H would be voted out on Tuesday so we need a few days to think of a way to make them immune”

Exactly.
striing
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by hoppyuppy:
“We are all in it together, if you quit, you lose your pay.

Very simmppplles.”

I've never heard that interpretation of employment law. And I've quit quite a few jobs in my time.
hoppyuppy
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by striing:
“I've never heard that interpretation of employment law. And I've quit quite a few jobs in my time.”

I will live knowing that, thanks for the input.
anne_666
18-01-2015
This show is a mess.
KT_Dog
18-01-2015
I'm not smelling moustache twirling manipulation in this one I'm afraid. It was supposed to be eviction number 3 but if it went ahead it would actually be the fifth person leaving the house. Their schedule would be all out of whack. I'd cancel Tuesdays if I was in charge too.
hoppyuppy
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by anne_666:
“This show is a mess.”

This show is fairly predictable too.
lkhere
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by Vicky8675309:
“Is it Perez's fault Alexander chose to use the word faggot? It's like blaming the rape victim by saying she was asking for it by dressing/acting provocatively. There are numerous other words Alexander could have said but instead he used "faggot" and revealed his true nature.”

Whilst I'm not excusing Alex's use of this word you do know Perez called Will iam's manager the same slur and actual justified his use of using this word afterwards?!! The man is a hypocrite and luckily got a nice punch in the face for using this word against someone...
I think Alex walked because the way Perez was continuing to goad and target him he probably would have punched him in the face too which is what Perez was pushing for...man it a total scrote!!
striing
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by hoppyuppy:
“I will live knowing that, thanks for the input.”

I'm struggling to follow the point you are making. Are you just making an unconnected point about politics without reference to employment law?
hoppyuppy
18-01-2015
Originally Posted by striing:
“I'm struggling to follow the point you are making. Are you just making an unconnected point about politics without reference to employment law?”

Yes, that.
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map