Has anyone else really gone off Michelle?

4 of 4

anne_666

19-01-2015

Originally Posted by bbcrzy:
“worked as a supervisor for years, have had to use skills to read people for honesty. I think emotion is colouring many people's opinions here, not neccessarily AGE or lack of experience.

as for IQ, some people have street smarts and others are naive. Neither really counts when it comes to Big Brother and OPINION

i read michelle as a hardcore FAKE. she has her little speeches she bolsters the others, riles them up and sets em loose....sitting back waiting for the chance to play 'the voice of reason'.

while I appreciate her attempts at gameplay, i think she's backed the wrong horse. Chloe and cami were the meangirls and i think the old bird was trying too hard to join into the young crowd.

its kinda sad. I still think she's making sure Cami is going to go before she does. ITs about making sure other people are your human shield thus giving you a better chance at staying.”

Well said. She's an expert gun loader and well practised at whipping up any situation into a frenzy to give herself the caring role at the end of the mess. I began to doubt her when Ken was rude to her about shagging Callum. She immediately said she wasn't offended but the others would be. In other words I'm far too together to be offended unlike the other women. That was spineless and passing the buck.Then she slagged him off behind his back, of course.

fifitrixibelle

19-01-2015

Originally Posted by scone:
“To be fair. Where can she go? She don't like Mario so she can't go to Nadia or Patsy? Who else? Calum? He hangs around Cami Li who Hopkins follows around.she don't have much choice.

If Mario left then it may change things. As it is Michelle and Hopkins have something in common.”

But there are others in the house....there is a reason she chose to side with Hopkins and crew and draw the battle lines, she has come across as weak, Hopkins will not tolerate you if you don't hate who she hates and join in with petty insults, it is also increasingly apparent that she rather enjoys it.
Frankly if you are a 'strong' woman as she likes to purport she and her cronies are..you wouldn't need to align yourself and indulge in and support the juvenile behaviour, she would speak her mind............the fact that she has decided Alicia is weak and needs her ludicrous advice is so hypocritical it is now funny and a bit sad.

anne_666

19-01-2015

Originally Posted by fifitrixibelle:
“But there are others in the house....there is a reason she chose to side with Hopkins and crew and draw the battle lines, she has come across as weak, Hopkins will not tolerate you if you don't hate who she hates and join in with petty insults, it is also increasingly apparent that she rather enjoys it.”

There's also the gang mentality with that lot, which suits her and Hopkins as they're both juvenile cowards. Neither of them could stand alone against anyone in the house. They need a villain as Alexander said and they need the strength in numbers. I think the two strongest women in there are Nadia and Alicia. Patsy doesn't know which ways up but at least she will not submit to Hopkins orders to ignore Perez. I can't see Katie P doing that either.

linmic

19-01-2015

Originally Posted by planets:
“It's interesting the difference between how she describes herself and how her actions describe her.
Describes herself as standing up for outcasts and minorities, yet referred to Alicia as "Dingbat" and is happy to engage in pack attacks of someone she describes as "weak" and has "one brain cell", not quite the champion of the outcast there then.....
The hypocritical whipping up of Cami and Chloe to attack Alicia for taking a banana when she and Katie had carefully stolen and hidden food earlier, a case of do as i say and not as i do?
The champion of LGBT rights but doesn't attack the HM who calls a gay man a "faggot" but instead berates the gay man for being the wrong sort of gay.
Anyone who repeatedly tells me they are one thing when their actions belie their propaganda is an unreliable narrator.”

Exactly.

I was reading an interview she did for the Telegraph stating how she stood up for people etc:

Do you want people to see another side to you?

I don't show it through my work, on RuPaul’s Drag Race. I'm there to do a job and that job is to be the stern aunt to those queens and to nurture and guide them. Everything I do is from the biggest place of love and respect. Anyone who gets up there with a wig and heels is my hero. For me, the other side I'd like people to see is that. That is my truth. I'm in there for the gay community. And not just the gays but for any kid who feels like they've never belonged to a group. All the freaks, all the weirdos, all the misfits who never felt like their life was worth it or have questioned if their life was worth it. I am in there for them.

Ross_1

19-01-2015

I went off of her when she joined in with the mean girls when they had the bedroom argument against Alicia, she was basically telling Alicia off for lying about saying that Cami brought Alicia's family into the argument (even though Cami definitely did). She goes off one ones saying that she doesn't know how people can defend Perez, yet she defended Cami when she said that. It's a shame, because I really liked her and wanted her to win. I just want her to not be so blind in her defences of people.
Last edited by Ross_1 : 19-01-2015 at 11:39

4 of 4