Its a bit daft to shout fix because an eviction as been cancelled after a hm walked, was it a fix when they cancelled last Tuesdays eviction.........? They are fast running out of hms, so far 4 have left and only one been evicted!
Perez is Nominated, Probably Would Have Been Evicted + BB Cancel Nominations? Fix?!
2 of 3
C*ntez C*nton got more than twice the votes of his more unpopular rivals so they decide to cancel Tuesday's eviction AGAIN. Instead we get another "twist", obviously designed to keep C*ntez in there. I'm giving up. It's the same episode over and over again anyway: C*ntez winds everyone up and Hatie has a go at him. Bored now.
I'll still have a lurk in here just in case anything interesting happens and I fancy having a look again, but otherwise... a big fat MEH from me.
I'll still have a lurk in here just in case anything interesting happens and I fancy having a look again, but otherwise... a big fat MEH from me.
This never happens on IACGMOOH or any other show in which the public pay money to evict who they dislike.
OK Alex has gone, fair enough, his decision.
But the fact still stands that everyone has nominated, it's not like the house is empty, why not just continue with a normal eviction voted by the public?
I don't want a twist which will be a predictable secret house.
I don't care who goes in it.
I want the British public to be able to vote out the people they don't want to be in the house.
It should be our decision BB producers, not yours.
But, as you proved last year, it's not really anything to do with us is it? Helen Wood.
OK Alex has gone, fair enough, his decision.
But the fact still stands that everyone has nominated, it's not like the house is empty, why not just continue with a normal eviction voted by the public?
I don't want a twist which will be a predictable secret house.
I don't care who goes in it.
I want the British public to be able to vote out the people they don't want to be in the house.
It should be our decision BB producers, not yours.
But, as you proved last year, it's not really anything to do with us is it? Helen Wood.
Originally Posted by Barracute:
“Its a bit daft to shout fix because an eviction as been cancelled after a hm walked, was it a fix when they cancelled last Tuesdays eviction.........? They are fast running out of hms, so far 4 have left and only one been evicted!”
“Its a bit daft to shout fix because an eviction as been cancelled after a hm walked, was it a fix when they cancelled last Tuesdays eviction.........? They are fast running out of hms, so far 4 have left and only one been evicted!”
Loads of housemates got nominations, they could have put them up! Was Alexander even up for eviction? If he was, surely Perez, Alicia and Nadia got as much or more nominations so they should have carried oin with the evictions with those 3!
Originally Posted by Styker:
“I think so and not for the first time!
There was no need to cancel the eviction, they could have easily have gone with the next bunch of housemates that got the most amount of nominations of which there were a lot!
I'm fed up with BB always protecting certain housemates so much!
”
“I think so and not for the first time!
There was no need to cancel the eviction, they could have easily have gone with the next bunch of housemates that got the most amount of nominations of which there were a lot!
I'm fed up with BB always protecting certain housemates so much!
”
It is definitely very fishy. Since the HMs who nominated Alexander got to nominate someone else instead, and voting lines hadn't opened before the change, the eviction could have gone ahead.
Originally Posted by Barracute:
“Its a bit daft to shout fix because an eviction as been cancelled after a hm walked, was it a fix when they cancelled last Tuesdays eviction.........? They are fast running out of hms, so far 4 have left and only one been evicted!”
“Its a bit daft to shout fix because an eviction as been cancelled after a hm walked, was it a fix when they cancelled last Tuesdays eviction.........? They are fast running out of hms, so far 4 have left and only one been evicted!”
Do you think that unless every roughly similar case is a fix, none of them can be?
Anyway, people were already voting when Ken was thrown out. Since Ken was one of the HMs facing the vote, they had to do something; and cancelling, then refunding everyone's money, was the easiest and least messy way out.
Originally Posted by CLL Dodge:
“Let's see what this amazing twist is.
Then we can cry foul.”
“Let's see what this amazing twist is.
Then we can cry foul.”
It can be better to cry foul first, since it can make them think again.
That may even be what happened re the crypt twist in bb12.
Originally Posted by Styker:
“Loads of housemates got nominations, they could have put them up! Was Alexander even up for eviction? If he was, surely Perez, Alicia and Nadia got as much or more nominations so they should have carried oin with the evictions with those 3!”
“Loads of housemates got nominations, they could have put them up! Was Alexander even up for eviction? If he was, surely Perez, Alicia and Nadia got as much or more nominations so they should have carried oin with the evictions with those 3!”
Since he left before the HMs completed nominations (or so it seemed in the highlights), and certainly before BB announced who was up, we don't know whether he was.
Normally, in the past, we'd have been able to work it out from the number of nominations he had, but BB's taken to changing how that works whenever they feel like it.
what happened to the days when a housemate went into the diary room & nominate 2 people & the housemates with the most votes are up for eviction & one goes on eviction night 
Originally Posted by Styker:
“I think so and not for the first time!
There was no need to cancel the eviction, they could have easily have gone with the next bunch of housemates that got the most amount of nominations of which there were a lot!
I'm fed up with BB always protecting certain housemates so much! ”
“I think so and not for the first time!
There was no need to cancel the eviction, they could have easily have gone with the next bunch of housemates that got the most amount of nominations of which there were a lot!
I'm fed up with BB always protecting certain housemates so much!
”
They cancelled the first eviction because Jeremy AND Ken were put out. They cancelled THIS one because Alexander walked and for no other reason. Mind you, it can't be denied that the timing was perfect. Now its just a matter of waiting to see what the twist is. Bedsit time if there is ANY chance of him going I would imagine, and in all fairness, I don't blame them. He has made the headlines of the show since day 1, he knows what he is doing, how to play the game, create drama, and the ratings are sky high. He is a producers wet dream and Perez being Perez knows it !!
It's too obvious now that they interfere to suit their agenda. Noms and evictions should he left alone.
Originally Posted by Styker:
“It seems to me that they keep on caving into Perez's demands to have people removed because "he doesn't feel safe"! If they stopped doing that and removed him for harasing husemates so much, they wouldn't of lost so many housemates before proper evictions.”
“It seems to me that they keep on caving into Perez's demands to have people removed because "he doesn't feel safe"! If they stopped doing that and removed him for harasing husemates so much, they wouldn't of lost so many housemates before proper evictions.”
Alexander was not removed. He walked.
Originally Posted by hopeless case:
“A couple of days of Perez not kicking off and he has become a bit of a bullied underdog in the eyes of many. Never underestimate the ability of the British public to vote for people who are being seen as isolated. He was safe unless he was against one other HM only because then it would have effectively been a vote to evict.”
“A couple of days of Perez not kicking off and he has become a bit of a bullied underdog in the eyes of many. Never underestimate the ability of the British public to vote for people who are being seen as isolated. He was safe unless he was against one other HM only because then it would have effectively been a vote to evict.”
Clearly the producers will want to keep Perez in as the ratings have been high. If he is in the bottom two and they freeze the vote like last week, then it will become a vote to evict and he will go, so it will be interesting to see if there is a freeze this week and it is consistent or not. I am guessing that the twist will be to put an additional hm up to split the vote further (again to ensure Perez stays). Why anyone still pays to vote on these manipulated shows is beyond me.
Originally Posted by Styker:
“Loads of housemates got nominations, they could have put them up! Was Alexander even up for eviction? If he was, surely Perez, Alicia and Nadia got as much or more nominations so they should have carried oin with the evictions with those 3!”
“Loads of housemates got nominations, they could have put them up! Was Alexander even up for eviction? If he was, surely Perez, Alicia and Nadia got as much or more nominations so they should have carried oin with the evictions with those 3!”
Alexander only got 2 Nominations, so he wouldn't have been up for eviction. HM's with 3 or more noms were announced
Only Keith & Nadia were called up to give another nomination as they both nom Alex.
Their 2nd nomination didn't make any difference to the final total as Nadia nom Michelle & Keith nom Kav.
Originally Posted by greenyone:
“I don't think Perez would have been evicted he's entertainment to the public just look at Speidl”
“I don't think Perez would have been evicted he's entertainment to the public just look at Speidl”
Totally agree.
I think Alicia would have gone.
I'm glad it's cancelled as I want all 4 of them in.
Only one I'd be happy to see leave right now is Kav.
The one I can't bear is Cami but even she brings something to the show. Squalking mostly.
Originally Posted by Styker:
“Yes Marcus Bentley mentioned it as the credits rolled at the end of last night highlights show.
How can you want him to stay when it seems he has seen off 2 housemates by complaining about them when it should have been him that got the marching orders for harassing housemates!”
“Yes Marcus Bentley mentioned it as the credits rolled at the end of last night highlights show.
How can you want him to stay when it seems he has seen off 2 housemates by complaining about them when it should have been him that got the marching orders for harassing housemates!”
If you're meaning Ken and Jeremy, they got removed on their own doing... Ken for his comments to Alexander, and Jeremy for exposing Chloe's breast.
Alexander as you know. Left on his own accord.
Originally Posted by Cranberryapple:
“
If you're meaning Ken and Jeremy, they got removed on their own doing... Ken for his comments to Alexander, and Jeremy for exposing Chloe's breast.
Alexander as you know. Left on his own accord.”
“
If you're meaning Ken and Jeremy, they got removed on their own doing... Ken for his comments to Alexander, and Jeremy for exposing Chloe's breast.
Alexander as you know. Left on his own accord.”
Perez played the "fear for my safety" card against both Jeremy and Alexander. He was even calling for his lawyer at one point. It's not clear Jermeny would have been thrown out if it hadn't been for the extreme reactions of some HMs including Perez.
Alexander left largely because of what Perez had done and was doing. And a HM leaving "of their own accord" can mask a behind-the-scenes deal with BB to avoid being thrown out.
I can't stand Perez as much as the next person but in a vote to save I think he would have stayed. If it was vote to evict he would definitely go. In a vote to save he would receive more votes than Nadia and possibly Alicia.
Originally Posted by conchie:
“They cancelled the first eviction because Jeremy AND Ken were put out.”
“They cancelled the first eviction because Jeremy AND Ken were put out.”
No, it was still going ahead after Jeremy left. It was cancelled when Ken left after voting had started. Cancelling and refunding the voters' money was the easiest way out of the mess. If the vote had continued, there'd be too much controversy over what should have happened.
Quote:
“ They cancelled THIS one because Alexander walked and for no other reason. ”
“ They cancelled THIS one because Alexander walked and for no other reason. ”
What makes you so sure it was "for no other reason"? Voting had not yet started, and they let the HMs continue to nominate after he left. BB even let the HMs who nominated him change their nomination to someone else. Only then, once it was clear who would face the vote, did BB decide to turn it into a twist instead.
Quote:
“Mind you, it can't be denied that the timing was perfect. Now its just a matter of waiting to see what the twist is. Bedsit time if there is ANY chance of him going I would imagine, and in all fairness, I don't blame them. He has made the headlines of the show since day 1, he knows what he is doing, how to play the game, create drama, and the ratings are sky high. He is a producers wet dream and Perez being Perez knows it !!”
“Mind you, it can't be denied that the timing was perfect. Now its just a matter of waiting to see what the twist is. Bedsit time if there is ANY chance of him going I would imagine, and in all fairness, I don't blame them. He has made the headlines of the show since day 1, he knows what he is doing, how to play the game, create drama, and the ratings are sky high. He is a producers wet dream and Perez being Perez knows it !!”
The ratings are not "sky high". And the "game" he's playing is one of the most despicable ever seen in BB.
Originally Posted by Styker:
“I think so and not for the first time!
There was no need to cancel the eviction, they could have easily have gone with the next bunch of housemates that got the most amount of nominations of which there were a lot!
I'm fed up with BB always protecting certain housemates so much! ”
“I think so and not for the first time!
There was no need to cancel the eviction, they could have easily have gone with the next bunch of housemates that got the most amount of nominations of which there were a lot!
I'm fed up with BB always protecting certain housemates so much!
”
So the most popular one would have been evicted in a vote to save?
Originally Posted by MissySmith:
“I thought that Emma said the votes would be carried forward for a Friday eviction??”
“I thought that Emma said the votes would be carried forward for a Friday eviction??”
The only rational post in this thread.
2 of 3
