Someone may have answered this before but anyone know why in the highlights we did not see what Perez was saying to Nadia whilst in the Gilded cage. When the eviction show ended we were shown a bit of live feed at the end and Perez was saying something to Nadia bout someone still being an "addict". However this seems to have been completely edited out of highlights and never mentioned again. I am sure I was not the only one who saw it. Any idea who he was talking about and why would he actually start on that tract?
Why weren't we shown Perez's Comment to Nadia whilst in the Gilded Cage?
1 of 2
Originally Posted by rbdcay:
“Someone may have answered this before but anyone know why in the highlights we did not see what Perez was saying to Nadia whilst in the Gilded cage. When the eviction show ended we were shown a bit of live feed at the end and Perez was saying something to Nadia bout someone still being an "addict". However this seems to have been completely edited out of highlights and never mentioned again. I am sure I was not the only one who saw it. Any idea who he was talking about and why would he actually start on that tract?”
“Someone may have answered this before but anyone know why in the highlights we did not see what Perez was saying to Nadia whilst in the Gilded cage. When the eviction show ended we were shown a bit of live feed at the end and Perez was saying something to Nadia bout someone still being an "addict". However this seems to have been completely edited out of highlights and never mentioned again. I am sure I was not the only one who saw it. Any idea who he was talking about and why would he actually start on that tract?”
Yes, he was in Full Vile Gossip Mode and it was clearly about some Male in this House who was still a practicing addict.....felt he didn't mean Alcohol either. I've no idea who it was but can limit it to 3 blokes, but he was obviously stirring the shit-pot whether true or not. Horrible man!
Oh, good point. I'd completely forgotten about that. I just googled the remaining males as I couldn't think of anyone who had had a drug problem, and it seems Alexander had a cocaine addiction, so I think it would be safe bet to say he was talking about him.
Originally Posted by iwholden:
“I got the jist he was talking about the american dude who was thrown out? The baywatch "hunk"?”
“I got the jist he was talking about the american dude who was thrown out? The baywatch "hunk"?”
That's who I thought he was talking about.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Kav, Alex, Jeremy and Keith are all recovering addicts. The first three it was a mixture of drugs and alcohol and Keith it was mostly alcohol. Apart from Jeremy there was no sign that any of them have relapsed.
PS. That does not mean I think Jeremy has relapsed, but I can't see that any of the others have by how they behave. Jeremy obviously was not coping too well so it's not so easy to say categorically.
Having said that Perez was obviously stirring like he does so none of them may have relapsed at all.
Having said that Perez was obviously stirring like he does so none of them may have relapsed at all.
Originally Posted by rbdcay:
“But why would channel 5 edit this out...oh wait is it another ploy to save Perez?”
“But why would channel 5 edit this out...oh wait is it another ploy to save Perez?”
From what we've seen so far, I'm betting BB has got a boatload of those up their one-sided sleeves.
I thought he was talking about something to do with Katie P as she had just come in, he has had all week to gossip about others in there
Originally Posted by rbdcay:
“But why would channel 5 edit this out...oh wait is it another ploy to save Perez?”
“But why would channel 5 edit this out...oh wait is it another ploy to save Perez?”
They edit most of the 50+ hours of a footage a day out, we only see 45 minutes
Originally Posted by spkx:
“They edit most of the 50+ hours of a footage a day out, we only see 45 minutes”
“They edit most of the 50+ hours of a footage a day out, we only see 45 minutes
”
True but they do like a bit of controversy and they really love Perez so why would they edit out his frankly libellous gossiping?
Originally Posted by rbdcay:
“True but they do like a bit of controversy and they really love Perez so why would they edit out his frankly libellous gossiping?”
“True but they do like a bit of controversy and they really love Perez so why would they edit out his frankly libellous gossiping?”
If it is libellous, that would already explain leaving it out.
Originally Posted by jarryhack:
“What was the point of the Gilded Cage anyway”
“What was the point of the Gilded Cage anyway
”
They probably had something planned and then thought f--- it. Would not surprise me.
Originally Posted by rbdcay:
“But why would channel 5 edit this out...oh wait is it another ploy to save Perez?”
“But why would channel 5 edit this out...oh wait is it another ploy to save Perez?”
Course it was , they could have shown it and then see how he could make his "lawyers" help him in a case for slander.., my money was on Alex he was on about.i. cant stand Perez the shite,
Originally Posted by rbdcay:
“But why would channel 5 edit this out...oh wait is it another ploy to save Perez?”
“But why would channel 5 edit this out...oh wait is it another ploy to save Perez?”
I imagine that their lawyers advised them to cut it...
Originally Posted by jarryhack:
“What was the point of the Gilded Cage anyway”
“What was the point of the Gilded Cage anyway
”
They wanted fireworks but as Perez was in full sulk mode it just fell flat.
I am surprised it got through the safety net of the live edit as it was clearly libellous, although I think BB knew what they were doing by making it unclear who he was talking about. It is his usual MO, gossip and shit stirring.
Originally Posted by Veri:
“If it is libellous, that would already explain leaving it out.”
“If it is libellous, that would already explain leaving it out.”
this. its not rocket science or a big conspiracy as many would like to believe
Originally Posted by rbdcay:
“True but they do like a bit of controversy and they really love Perez so why would they edit out his frankly libellous gossiping?”
“True but they do like a bit of controversy and they really love Perez so why would they edit out his frankly libellous gossiping?”
You've just answered your own question in the same sentence.
That part of the live feed was cut off quick smart...
Yep, I think he started off by saying something like 'I know why she's done this' (put him in the cage imo), 'it's because she knows I know stuff' and then going on to say she'd confided the chap concerned was a recovering addict but he believed he was actually still using.
The drift I got was that (maybe?) Price put him in there so when the limelight was on her full force it wouldn't be brought up between them.
Or - also - private stuff that is or might be true, stuff that BB simply don't want a court case out of, info stipulated in contracts that certain things won't be broadcast etc.
Originally Posted by auntysplat:
“I thought he was talking about something to do with Katie P as she had just come in, he has had all week to gossip about others in there”
“I thought he was talking about something to do with Katie P as she had just come in, he has had all week to gossip about others in there”
Originally Posted by binksy111:
“I remember seeing it, and also on catch up and I thought he was referring to Katie p Husband.”
“I remember seeing it, and also on catch up and I thought he was referring to Katie p Husband.”
Yep, I think he started off by saying something like 'I know why she's done this' (put him in the cage imo), 'it's because she knows I know stuff' and then going on to say she'd confided the chap concerned was a recovering addict but he believed he was actually still using.
The drift I got was that (maybe?) Price put him in there so when the limelight was on her full force it wouldn't be brought up between them.
Originally Posted by Veri:
“If it is libellous, that would already explain leaving it out.”
“If it is libellous, that would already explain leaving it out.”
Or - also - private stuff that is or might be true, stuff that BB simply don't want a court case out of, info stipulated in contracts that certain things won't be broadcast etc.
I thought he was talking about Katie P's husband too.
The way he was desperate to impart some salacious gossip was horrible but that is what he does for a living. It's funny how he can dish it out but not take it himself.
If he had been talking about anyone in the house previously he would have had time to tell them already.
Another thing they didn't show any more of was the revelation that Keith had a phone in the house, which a few housemates knew about.
The way he was desperate to impart some salacious gossip was horrible but that is what he does for a living. It's funny how he can dish it out but not take it himself.
If he had been talking about anyone in the house previously he would have had time to tell them already.
Another thing they didn't show any more of was the revelation that Keith had a phone in the house, which a few housemates knew about.
1 of 2
