Originally Posted by Kay2000:
“This is a place for discussion is it not?
”
“This is a place for discussion is it not?
”
Was that ever in any doubt
"I couldn't get enough up there"
4 of 8
Originally Posted by theia:
“Love the way "prudes" is bandied about on here when posters don't want to hear about someone's ex's sexual preferences when these are talked about in such a way as to cause possible embarrassment to the ex.”
“Love the way "prudes" is bandied about on here when posters don't want to hear about someone's ex's sexual preferences when these are talked about in such a way as to cause possible embarrassment to the ex.”
Oh please. Spare us the false outrage. All these people would probably bare their sphincters to the world if it meant more money and publicity. I'm sure Alex is grateful for his name being mentioned again. We are talking about people whose sole reason for being 'famous' is their sordid, tacky lives on reality shows or suchlike. None of them have any discernible talent whatsoever. So they have to take what they get, that's the price
Originally Posted by changa:
“Was that ever in any doubt”
“Was that ever in any doubt
”
So what's your point. I'm keeping in with the T&C. I'm flattered your taking a interest in my posts.
Originally Posted by hendoll:
“Goodness, what a bunch of prudes on here! It was FUNNY. If you're so precious about pretty common sexual activities, maybe you should stick to Downton....”
“Goodness, what a bunch of prudes on here! It was FUNNY. If you're so precious about pretty common sexual activities, maybe you should stick to Downton....”
I think you are missing the point of why some people found that conversation wrong. It has nothing to do with her talking about sex, if she wants to discuss her own sexual practices then she has every right to. Discussing someone elses sexual practices on national tv when that person has no say in the matter is out of order.
I'm surprised they showed that repulsive talk from her . Usually BB blanks out any personal talk about friends, acquaintances when they're not there to defend themselves .
It doesn't seem right to allow a HM destroy another person like that on a reality show without that person been there to defend themselves . I wonder what is the legal position on this .
It doesn't seem right to allow a HM destroy another person like that on a reality show without that person been there to defend themselves . I wonder what is the legal position on this .
Originally Posted by Silverking:
“I wonder if Alex regrets this from last week:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AeXJhSKxPo”
“I wonder if Alex regrets this from last week:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AeXJhSKxPo”
what was the point ?Can't he just have phoned her ?
hmmm
Oh well................cue defamation of character lawsuit then !
Originally Posted by Nicola32:
“I think you are missing the point of why some people found that conversation wrong. It has nothing to do with her talking about sex, if she wants to discuss her own sexual practices then she has every right to. Discussing someone elses sexual practices on national tv when that person has no say in the matter is out of order.”
“I think you are missing the point of why some people found that conversation wrong. It has nothing to do with her talking about sex, if she wants to discuss her own sexual practices then she has every right to. Discussing someone elses sexual practices on national tv when that person has no say in the matter is out of order.”
I don't agree. There is a whole industry based on the gossip and tell-tale stories of these so-called celebrities. People devour it, gorging themselves on the salacious details and then spew out some kind of twisted moral justification for whoever's side they've chosen to take. It's pretty disgusting all round.
So I insist on my right to find KH's comment amusing.
Originally Posted by Addisonian:
“What a repulsive conversation that was all round.”
“What a repulsive conversation that was all round.”
Typical talk today, particularly amongst celebs (younger).
Originally Posted by aggielane:
“It's handy when you have run out of cupboard space”
“It's handy when you have run out of cupboard space”
I nearly fell off the floor laughing at that.
ROFL
Originally Posted by hendoll:
“ ....... None of them have any discernible talent whatsoever. So they have to take what they get, that's the price”
“ ....... None of them have any discernible talent whatsoever. So they have to take what they get, that's the price
”
*snarf*
Originally Posted by gulliverfoyle:
“she needs to stop marrying gay men”
“she needs to stop marrying gay men”
maybe they were straight until they slept with KP
I'm now seeing Katie Price as the Christopher Timothy of sex. If they ever remake All Creatures Great and Small they should cast her as the new female vet. She will have had the practice.
Originally Posted by PaleHorse:
“Alex Reid must be absolutely mortified, watching this.”
“Alex Reid must be absolutely mortified, watching this.”
could he sue Channel 5 for libel?
Originally Posted by chachachavvy:
“I'm now seeing Katie Price as the Christopher Timothy of sex. If they ever remake All Creatures Great and Small they should cast her as the new female vet. She will have had the practice.”
“I'm now seeing Katie Price as the Christopher Timothy of sex. If they ever remake All Creatures Great and Small they should cast her as the new female vet. She will have had the practice.”
Excellent. Katie H can be the cow.
Originally Posted by Jungle Cats:
“could he sue Channel 5 for libel?”
“could he sue Channel 5 for libel?”
It would be slander as it's spoken rather than libel, and only if it's not true. The C5 lawyers will have judged there's enough 'out there' about him for there not to be a legal risk.
Originally Posted by hicken:
“It would be slander as it's spoken rather than libel, and only if it's not true. The C5 lawyers will have judged there's enough 'out there' about him for there not to be a legal risk.”
“It would be slander as it's spoken rather than libel, and only if it's not true. The C5 lawyers will have judged there's enough 'out there' about him for there not to be a legal risk.”
Out there? Ewww. That really is too much information
sorry, just keeping in with the vet theme going on now.
Originally Posted by theia:
“Love the way "prudes" is bandied about on here when posters don't want to hear about someone's ex's sexual preferences when these are talked about in such a way as to cause possible embarrassment to the ex.”
“Love the way "prudes" is bandied about on here when posters don't want to hear about someone's ex's sexual preferences when these are talked about in such a way as to cause possible embarrassment to the ex.”
Indeed!
Originally Posted by Kay2000:
“It has nothing to do with with being prudish. It's disrespectful to him and his new fiancée. She just regurgitates the same old stories. No concern for her children that may get to hear this. She wants to sodding grow up.”
“It has nothing to do with with being prudish. It's disrespectful to him and his new fiancée. She just regurgitates the same old stories. No concern for her children that may get to hear this. She wants to sodding grow up.”
Exactly, shocking!
Originally Posted by hendoll:
“Out there? Ewww. That really is too much information sorry, just keeping in with the vet theme going on now.”
“Out there? Ewww. That really is too much information
sorry, just keeping in with the vet theme going on now.”
Surely you mean up there?
Sorry
Originally Posted by chloeb:
“I mean I'm not a fan of the bloke but that was plain nasty and unecessary. ..let it go love”
“I mean I'm not a fan of the bloke but that was plain nasty and unecessary. ..let it go love”
agree its his and Chantelles little girl I feel sorry for
poor little girl growing up with all that
I actually thought (although distasteful) the conversation was rather apt for DS forumers. During the last BB the forum was obsessed with what and who was up the HM's arses!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...g-Brother.html
Alex not happy - but then he did know exactly who and what he was marrying
Alex not happy - but then he did know exactly who and what he was marrying
Originally Posted by calamity:
“Can KP not be sued over what she said about Alex last night..”
“Can KP not be sued over what she said about Alex last night..”
Only if it's not actually true, I would think.
4 of 8
