Firstly Katie P was asked to save the most entertaining HM so she saved Katie H because she really liked her, secondly she was asked to nominate the least entertaining HM to replace Katie H and she nominated Callum because she believed he'd be safe from eviction, should she have been told her reasons were not acceptable?

nominations are a complete farce

Everyone seems to agree KH is entertaining and frankly CB is incredibly boring so I agree with her choices.

I didn't say I didn't agree with her choices, I just wonder why BB pull some HM's up with their reasons and not others

Perhaps KP was reluctant to publicly admit she found Calum boring

I think because it was live and they're under time restraints they don't really care.

I thought it was a twist that shook Big Brother to it's very core and things will never be the same again.