The key difference is Perez is many stages of evolution behind Katie H. Most Kate-Haters are not very intelligent, which suits her fine.

Then that makes you the childish one, nay it makes you worse because you should know better.

Katie goads Perez to behave like that to. She enjoys winding him to let him go just so she can whine and bitch and moan about him. (But if he effects her at al directly she can't handle it)

There is very little in the World that Katie seems to understand but she writes it off as being colourful and yet also just black and white at the same time.

Alicia doesn't help herself on that score.

So if the housemates all started calling her Horse Face, that wouldn't be mockery?

They are both obnoxious but at least Perez can be entertaining e.g. getting it on with a chair and a window!

Slatey Gobkins' popularity would sink like a stone should Perez leaves since so much of it revolves around her tackling him.

Yep, and she expects Alicia to deal with it yet she can't deal with Perez.

That doesn't make it ok though does it?

It wouldn't be if it were true.

We can't all be enlightened Sun readers. :-./

No she definitely mocks her intelligence and her parenting and her appearance. Those things are not disagreements, just a very judgmental and unpleasant Katie Hopkins who relishes belittling others and pretending that this makes her a champion of being un PC.

So telling the truth isn't ok then?

I would say the complete opposite but won't as I disagree with the word 'haters'.

Alicia shouldn't be allowed to spout her ridiculous opinions without being challenged by anyone...that's what Katie H does.

There is truth and there is using certain truths to deliberately hurt someone. What if Alicia had a learning disability would it be OK then? What if she had a brain tumour, would it be ok then? What if Katie told someone with burns they looked like Freddie Kreuger, would that be OK?

Same applies to Hopkins whinging and crying about Perez

Her opinions are black and white, she either likes something or she doesn't, no waffle.
Everyone in that house understands why Perez does what he does,except Nadia who encourages him - Perez taunts Katie H we've seen him do it daily - Katie reacts to those taunts because she's no pushover and doesn't see why Perez should be able to get away with his childish nonsense.Hopefully Nadia will go tonight and he won't have mother hen protecting him.

So Alicia has to be challenged on her Appearance and intelligence even though they are aspects of her rather than an opinion? Her parenting decisions could be construed as opinions but that is still incredibly rude of Katie.

Perez fans like his obnoxious behaviour - they think it's funny.
Hopkins fans like her obnoxiousness - they think she's right.

That is the key difference though isn't it? Perez fans like me know he is an idiot we just find him funny in an otherwise bad series, however Katie Hopkins fans truly believe she is right in all things she says and does.

There are plenty of ways of challenging someone without making it clear that you regard them with contempt. What business is it of KH's to police the opinions of her fellow HMs anyway? She moans at Nadia for getting involved in other people's business, and yet her career is based on sticking her nose unwanted into other people's stuff.

No, Katie H voices opinions, that's hardly sticking her nose in other peoples business.

We are all allowed our opinions, or this forum would be pretty quiet.

I see total contempt for all things Katie H (and other HM's) on here, how is that any better than what she does?

Hilton is lovely, Hopkins is not..

In the house it seems Katie tries to bully the weak, while Perez tries to bully the bully.

LOL blinkered much.?