Originally Posted by planets:
“You are not the only poster who keeps posting this, yet i've seen you and the posters who like to use this fallacy in threads where people have detailed why they dislike Michelle, or why they "went off" Michelle, and none of it was due to her association with Hopkins. People have repeatedly posted that they started to "go off" Michelle when her actions contradicted her propaganda. For example she would repeatedly state "i'm here for all the freaks and outcasts" that's one of her selling points but then her actions were she would call Alicia "dingbat" and laugh at how stupid she was "one brain cell" etc that's not "being there for the outcasts" that's ridiculing someone because they aren't the same as you.
There was the hypocrisy over attacking Alicia over a banana when we had seen footage of Michelle and Katie stealing and hiding food themselves, yet it was Michelle who rallied the troops with "Dingbat's stolen bananas"....
Then there was further hypocrisy with all the "i'm here for all the LGBT community" unless you happened to be a the wrong type of gay then she would support the person using the descriptor "faggot" . Would she have supported Alex if he'd called Kav a faggot?
So to answer your question no, it's not the fact she hangs out with Katie Hopkins that people dislike Michelle.”
Brilliant, I'd never side with someone who used language like that.
Originally Posted by Lucypher:
“I love Michelle and she's very much respected in the equal rights movement. It's not so much about supporting gay people, as promoting equality. She didn't support Alex's use of the word 'faggot' when he was describing Perez taunting him with sexual antics - man blowing kisses and doing suggestive tongue movements to another man - Michelle was the first to shut Alex up. I expect her to make one or two unpopular comments in that pressure cooker environment, and BB always highlights that stuff. I'd rather have Michelle in my corner, though, than Perez, who flaunts his sexuality in a way that does potentially hinder the progress of the gay rights movement.”
Perez never mentions his sexuality or canvass for the gay vote. Why shouldn't he flaunt himself, it's not his sexuality he's flaunting it's himself, you know what they say if ya got it flaunt it!
Anything but Cami flaunts herself 24/7 far worse than Perez, how many times have we seen scenes which verge on soft porn with Perez and Kav? None, unlike anything but Cami and baldy Calum who spend most of the time entwined.
Originally Posted by JayUK69:
“Very well said. Plus we only see a fraction of what goes on during a 24 hour period. They broadcast that one comment calling Katie H homophobic, who knows how many more times he's made similar accusations. The others during that episode made comments about him taking the Big Brother handbook up to the diary room all the time and complaining. He will clearly say or do anything to get others evicted or ejected so he wins.
I completely back-up Michelle in her comments if this is the case. He acts the way he does and when challenged or someone bites back, he pulls out the homophobia card. As a gay man myself, I find it disgusting when anyone uses this for their own gain and it trivialises genuine bigotry.”
http://www.inquirelive.co.uk/comment...needs-to-stop/
”
