• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Woman crucified if in bra & knickers. Perez in pants funny?
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
AMS13
24-01-2015
Originally Posted by phil.c:
“So if Perez had been voted out last night he would have had 30 seconds to leave.

Meaning he would have come out of the house in his pants.

So why did he sit there with just a fur round him wearing only pants?

For effect thats why. the same as everything else he does in there.

A quite deliberate ploy to get airtime.

Funny? .

Your'e having a laugh....It's is pathetic how desparate he is to stay in there.

Although he pretends he doesn't.”

Good comment. I don't think I can be bothered to watch it anymore. Mainly because of Perez and last night, the gift wrap ribbon around his head and then the thought of him coming out in his underwear. At least the other House Mates took the effort to get dressed.
Sasparella
24-01-2015
Originally Posted by allie4:
“You're being far too sensible and grown up for this particular thread, slappers!
I've decided to ignore the Perez admirers - I will never understand that sort of 'humour' or condone that kind of narcissistic and fricking boring behaviour!”

Same here, I abhor attention seekers with a passion. and he's the ultimate attention seeker.
SegaGamer
24-01-2015
Originally Posted by Scamps8:
“How is it that women would be crucified by the viewers if they walked around in the house all day in their bra and knickers or a bikini but some think it is ok and even thought of as funny that a man walks around in his pants? Double standards?”

Well i don't have a problem with it.
Paace
24-01-2015
Originally Posted by Eurostar:
“Indeed, but he even admits all this : prancing around the garden singing "I'm playing the game right now, I'm playing it so well" the night he stripped off and had sex with the window. He's not even trying to pretend that he's not putting on a performance for the cameras.”

Maybe he's just thumbing his nose at the whole reality show, BB lark especially when we don't have live feed and we are shown every night just brief snippets of what the BB producers want us to see .

We are not seeing the real people in the house . In the brief 45 mins last night we saw Patsy laughing and enjoying herself with Cami whereas in the HLs she's usually shown downcast .

We know Perez puts on a deliberate act for the cameras which he knows will get shown, but he doesn't act like that for the remainder of the 24 hrs .
Lucypher
24-01-2015
Oh the denial! I repeat my earlier assertion that many people on the online forums use awful words about women who wear very little in the house whereas they let Perez and his near nakedness go as being 'funny' - and with admiration! It might not be as obvious as stating 'That Cami's a slag for showing her NIPPLES!!' But the covert insults about her being trampy or a tart run throughout the forum and yeah,it's mainly women who slut shame.
JVS
24-01-2015
Originally Posted by phil.c:
“ Perez ...Funny? .
.”

Yep, he's hilarious.
What name??
24-01-2015
Originally Posted by Lucypher:
“Oh the denial! I repeat my earlier assertion that many people on the online forums use awful words about women who wear very little in the house whereas they let Perez and his near nakedness go as being 'funny' - and with admiration! It might not be as obvious as stating 'That Cami's a slag for showing her NIPPLES!!' But the covert insults about her being trampy or a tart run throughout the forum and yeah,it's mainly women who slut shame.”

I think you are wrong. There was a lit of support for Chloe to be able to wear, or not wear, what she liked without being hassled. I think the audience is equally not bothered by Perez undress but are interested in the housemates responses to it.

And Cami is called a slag for having a boyfriend and flirting blatently with someone whi also has a partner. There is a double standard but that is about she getting mire flack for it than him.

KH faced the same criticism and she always appears fully dressed. It's the behaviour not the dress style that is being criticised. Which is why Choe didn't face the same reaction despite flashing her butt etc. The audience mainly didn't care.
Olivia024
25-01-2015
Originally Posted by slappers r us:
“What is there to get?
He acts like a petulant child in a grownups skin

All this me, me, I want to go is so he has got an excuse if he geets booted out

He knows how it all works and that while Alicia had her interview there would havee been live feed shown

Its just a shame he couldnt let up with his childish antics while one of his besties was getting their time in the spotlight he even had to push in on that”

I was a bit surprised that Perez didn't appear at all sad or unhappy that Alicia had been evicted, but to try to hijack the attention from her interview just showed how truly self-absorbed and childish he truly is.
trevor tiger
25-01-2015
Originally Posted by Pumping Iron:
“Because I read the forums”

Me too but still how do you know that it is mainly women that slut shame?
trevor tiger
25-01-2015
Originally Posted by Lucypher:
“Oh the denial! I repeat my earlier assertion that many people on the online forums use awful words about women who wear very little in the house whereas they let Perez and his near nakedness go as being 'funny' - and with admiration! It might not be as obvious as stating 'That Cami's a slag for showing her NIPPLES!!' But the covert insults about her being trampy or a tart run throughout the forum and yeah,it's mainly women who slut shame.”

Well you've let yourself down there. You have absolutely no evidence to back that up and only shown your own sexism in saying it and therefore your own hypocrisy in apparently trying to out other sexists.
Scarlet O'Hara
25-01-2015
Deleted. Can't be arsed.
sallystrawb
25-01-2015
Originally Posted by Lucypher:
“Oh the denial! I repeat my earlier assertion that many people on the online forums use awful words about women who wear very little in the house whereas they let Perez and his near nakedness go as being 'funny' - and with admiration! It might not be as obvious as stating 'That Cami's a slag for showing her NIPPLES!!' But the covert insults about her being trampy or a tart run throughout the forum and yeah,it's mainly women who slut shame.”

No its not! Most of the women I know when watching bb with me will comment on whose clothes we like, which pair of shoes we'd like to get, the makeup we like (apart from Katie P's tan), the sparkly tops we like, we are all about the womens fashion in there...what I don't like is Cami-li. A man walking around in a pair of shorts should not offend anyone....its a pair of shorts, not a penis.
MargMck
25-01-2015
Something that hasn't been mentioned (I don't think) is eroticism. Young women whose attractive bodies are actually what brought about their Zeleb status can appear to be parading round the house while scantily dressed, using this facet as their main route to airtime. I think they do.
Perez can also be accused of seeking airtime but in his case the result is laughable. There is nothing about the daft man prancing about in speedos that is sexually appealing... although someone is welcome to tell me they find it a turn on.
SULLA
25-01-2015
Hilton in just his pants is funny because he has no genitals.
trevor tiger
25-01-2015
Originally Posted by SULLA:
“Hilton in just his pants is funny because he has no genitals.”

Really I usually find cocks funny
Pumping Iron
25-01-2015
Originally Posted by trevor tiger:
“Me too but still how do you know that it is mainly women that slut shame?”

Because most people put their genders in their DS profiles.
Desy Boy
25-01-2015
Naked men are always funnier than naked women.
oathy
25-01-2015
I actually don't mind perez but that outfit really was scary.
grubby pants blanket around him it was like watching Strangeway riot all over again.
puddytat
25-01-2015
Perez cavorting about in pants is being deliberately provoking. Not in the least amusing. But I'm not amused by Cami Li's underwear, or lack of it. Make her wear M +S big knickers, BB, think she'd rather die.😄
pope_tart
25-01-2015
Originally Posted by MargMck:
“Something that hasn't been mentioned (I don't think) is eroticism. Young women whose attractive bodies are actually what brought about their Zeleb status can appear to be parading round the house while scantily dressed, using this facet as their main route to airtime. I think they do.
Perez can also be accused of seeking airtime but in his case the result is laughable. There is nothing about the daft man prancing about in speedos that is sexually appealing... although someone is welcome to tell me they find it a turn on.”

I agree with what you say..... and I think for equality's sake that Perez should start upping the eroticism perhaps by letting a few millimetres of testicle protrude from each side of his speedos to match Cami's bra bulge effect
planets
25-01-2015
Originally Posted by pope_tart:
“I agree with what you say..... and I think for equality's sake that Perez should start upping the eroticism perhaps by letting a few millimetres of testicle protrude from each side of his speedos to match Cami's bra bulge effect ”

Do you mean this sort of thing?
Scarlet O'Hara
25-01-2015
Originally Posted by planets:
“Do you mean this sort of thing?”

Hahahaha!!!
trevor tiger
25-01-2015
Originally Posted by Pumping Iron:
“Because most people put their genders in their DS profiles.”

Most not all and even that isn't verified though even if it were have you actually counted up which of those posters that slut shame are female and which are male and in any kind of fair and even loosely scientific way?

Like I said you have absolutely no basis other than a sexist bias against females for saying that mainly women slut sham other women.
Pumping Iron
25-01-2015
Originally Posted by trevor tiger:
“Most not all and even that isn't verified though even if it were have you actually counted up which of those posters that slut shame are female and which are male and in any kind of fair and even loosely scientific way?

Like I said you have absolutely no basis other than a sexist bias against females for saying that mainly women slut sham other women.”

My basis is this forum and the observations of what I've read.

I have no sexist bias, I love women

I think you maybe the kind of person who cries sexism very quickly though
trevor tiger
25-01-2015
Originally Posted by Pumping Iron:
“My basis is this forum and the observations of what I've read.

I have no sexist bias, I love women

I think you maybe the kind of person who cries sexism very quickly though ”

The speed is irrelevant it's more about the accuracy
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map