People cry when they interfere with the noms but a lot of times they know it has to be done to keep enough interest in the show. The morons can't wait to vote someone like Perez out just so they can BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO and chuck a few other obscenities at them. After that 15mins of "fun" then what? We sit and watch boring HMs doing and saying as little as possible and then we hear the many complaints about how dull and boring the show is(from the same morons who were determined to see all the active 1's kicked out)

No matter how many times we see the same bad movie, even with a chance to change the course of how it goes, the moronic voters continue sending it the same bad way...year in, year out.

It is actually a very good idea to boycott Perez from nominations. Because then housemates will spread nominations over a vast array of different people, instead all for a single person. This means EVERYONE is at risk. Not just one specific person.

It's tiring seeing the same people up for nominations. Time for some different faces.

Have to agree with you.

He's providing nearly all of the talking points in there and as much as he'd drive me to commit murder if I had to share a room with him - he has to stay........for now

Katie Gobshite and her little posse only hate him so much because he's a limelight stealer and they're jealous of him getting attention they're not.

Everything she hates about Perez - she is herself.

Arrogant, delusional, crass, loud, obnoxious, bombastic and rude.

Two ****ing peas in a pod.

Fantastic response - 10/10

For once I agree with CH5 tactics, in fact i would give him immunity til the end of the series and watch the fireworks. They have to keep Perez at all costs cos he has made the show this year and without him it would just be happy families. The public can't be trusted to keep the interesting and entertaining ones in the show, proved by the people who voted for Calum Best - he was the least entertaining of the 4 people up on Friday.

Its only fair he is immune this week, last week they gave Katie H the same treatment, and the public voted to keep Perez in.

Lets see what happens when its the other way round (presuming Katie H is up this time), people can cry fix all they want, but so far its definitely been fixed in KH's favour, nice to see they are turning against her at last

As well as this it would also identify where the true source of conflict within Perez and Katie is. If Katie livens up about it Perez looks worse for his own behaviour or if Katie begins ostracising another target in Perez's absence ala Patsy then she is going to be seen negatively by the audience.

No they did not, Katy P gave her immunity. This is blatant manipulation.

Yeah, nice post, Bunions The following being the best piece "as much as he'd drive me to commit murder if I had to share a room with him - he has to stay........for now

Allowing such a "crazy"-"baddie" to win is of no importance. But keeping them there for as long as possible is imperative in retaining a good show right until the finale.