Originally Posted by Stardust365:
“I'm probably being very naive here, but I see gay people as people.... not 'gay'. We are a colourful world and we don't all like the same thing.... for example, we don't all like the same kind of music, football team, hair colour etc... what someone straight likes to do in bed will be different to what another straight person likes to do in bed, and so on. So in my mind, constantly defining someone for their sexual preferences kind of annoys me. Aren't we all just people?
Talking about the L&GC and having people 'represent' them in some way shape or form sort of makes them sound like a different species! Gay people are just people with a preference aren't they. Why does that make them hugely different to other people? We're all human and all like differing things.
This post isn't meant to offend or antagonise anybody, I'm just curious as to how 'gay people' (and I'm loathe to use those words because that means I'm defining someone by their sexual preference) feel about having Michelle constantly say she's representing the gay community? Is it annoying or are you happy about it?
I am aware that Michelle was in a girl band years ago which didn't do too well and she wanted to remain in the industry, so she got a job on radio and from that got a lucky break from RuPaul which is what has led her to become a global spokeswoman for gay people everywhere. I'm sure there's no doubt she genuinely cares, but isn't this basically her career and what not only pays her mortgage, but keeps her relevant and famous... which is what she originally wanted from the girl band (fame and money).
It's only my opinion (not fact) and I'm willing to hear all points of views and take on board others opinions. And yes, I'm possibly very naive.”
I don't claim to have the lowdown on Michelle's past, but an pre-BB interview with her that was linked on here made for interesting reading.
In it, she said that, at the time she was first asked to work on the Drag Race show, she was doing some talk-show on some obscure local (Texan?) radio station. She says that she was reluctant to ask her bosses at the station for permission to take time off to do the show because she thought they were so conservative they would refuse, and that she only plucked up the courage when a friend insisted she go for it.
It was interesting in two respects: the fact that she worked for what she considered to be a conservative station (so much so she thought they would refuse her permission to work on a show promoting gay people and lifestyles) suggests that her own talk show was hardly the bastion of gay rights activism I'd been led to believe by some here; and also that, contrary to her strong woman image, she didn't feel strong enough to speak to her bosses about it until a (presumably stronger) friend pushed her into it.