Is this based on fact or is just summation? Have they nominated yet or did they nominate before he left?

Here is Perez in the Secret Room watching while the others nominate
http://tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv/big...atches-on.html

Here is Perez in the Secret Room watching on whilst the others nominate
http://tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv/big...atches-on.html

agree

It is a fix but for once i'm glad. Need to keep him in as long as hopkins is around. As soon as she goes he can go next for all i care.

I understand people want Perez in and thats ok. But l want an open field. Everyone should be up for nomination. Then we can all vote. This is taking it out of our hands .

I know. I think we should be able to vote for all. This is mow a fix.

it just spoils the point of nominations if certain house mates are immune. I thought Helens free pass to the final was a terrible idea and ruined the natural dynamics of what the show should have been last year.

Why doesn't BB just give him a pass to the final and be done with it?

Fine by me

Maybe they can manipulate the votes too so that he can win

Good summary

I don't think it's on even when it's a task for a housemate to win immunity.

But in this series BB have actually just decided for themselves to save housemates from eviction.
They did it with Katie H, and now with Perez.

You can't have BB themselves deciding to save certain housemates from eviction just because they feel like it.

I like your ideas

Obviously i agree but sadly they seem to do more nonsense every year. This time the fix has gone the way i want for the first time ever! So im going to be a bad person and enjoy it.

He always said he was in the final, maybe that was written into his contract like he's not allowed to go hungry, he's not allowed to feel unsafe.



They nominated after he went to the NOT so secret room.

I'm trying to think of the time they first started messing with noms and evictions, possibly series four was the begining with Jon Tickle?

Difference is Hopkins would have stayed in by a landslide anyway.

Probably not a fix. The odds are based off of what they saw last week and it is currently a race between 2 people. While I don't see Perez winning I do think he would be safe again. I also think it becomes interesting to see what happens when you take Perez out of the equation. He seems to have become pivotal character in this house.
Let's face it....take out either Katie H. or Perez and you would be changing the dynamics of the house. He is the better choice especially since Katie H. got the advantage last week even though she didn't need it.

That would be silly though. Why would anyone be proud of such a hollow 'win'? Because it wouldn't be a win, would it?

It doesn't matter what they do, eventually the odious little man will be ejected.

Good task! I don't vote so it doesn't bother me either way.
It will be interesting to see how much of a borefest this will be without him though.

Maybe they did this because they were terrified Perezie might sue them over the "fake tweet"--to "make it up" to his whiny ar**.

A blatant fix to keep him in.
Utterly shameless.

If this is true why are people spending money to bother voting, everyone who has voted in this series should be given their money back.

Perhaps BB will surprise us all and, because he wasn't available for HMs to nominate, Perez will automatically be added to the list of those who are up for eviction?

I've never understood all the furore when it comes to cbb, there is no prize or anything, what difference does it make who gets to the final or even wins for that matter

A blatant fix. The figures showed on friday that the viewers are sick of him. No surprise though as channel 5 have shown a heavily manipulated showcevery time. The viewers have very little say in what goes on nowadays.