• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Didn't Take Hopkins Long 2 Put KP Down re Disabled Son
<<
<
2 of 20
>>
>
mitacond
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by coopermanyorks:
“Surely KH tells Michelle what she can think ?”

I wonder if Michelle knows she is being used.

Originally Posted by Boox:
“Mirror Online

It has nothing to do with HER money...it is HIS disability and as a child HE is entitled to treatment, costs, care on the NHS”

Of course he is a person in his own right Katie H should be ashamed of herself.

Originally Posted by Trish123:
“Katie does pay and also is very involved in a Charity for children like Harvey.

Hopkins is one sadistic human being. If she starts on Harvey I feel KP will flip her wig so Perez better hang on to it.”

Omg that must have really upset Katie P.
MACTOWIN
26-01-2015
First point is that in the poll in that Left wing rag most agreed with Katie and also Michelle agreed with her.
tuppencehapenny
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by danny_gamer:
“Nadia fan doesn't like Hopkins fan shocker ”

That does sound awfully childish.
MC_Satan
26-01-2015
He has Prader Willi doesn't he? He is entitled to the same treatment as anyone else. KH probably doesn't understand how much support he will need over his lifetime. It's a genetic chromosome disorder and afaik there is no cure.
Scarlett Berry
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by danny_gamer:
“Nope. She is not attacking KP or Harvey. But don't let that stop the witch hunt against someone who dares to have..god, forbid..an opinion ”

Oh for goodness sake....total exaggeration.
Bagshot85
26-01-2015
She pays her taxes, of course her son is entitled to all that care, regardless of whether she does or not...he's a British child.
Funny world we live in, where the better off (who pay more taxes btw,) are frowned upon when they take advantage of what's offered, yet those who contribute nothing have no problem in getting their hands on whatever they can.
zelda fan
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by tuppencehapenny:
“That does sound awfully childish.”

Not to mention they got it wrong im more a Perez fan but admittedly Nadia is my second fave.
puppetangel
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by Boox:
“She is saying that with her money, she should pay for the costs of his care, treatment...

Do you think Michelle:

1. Agrees?

2. Disagrees?”

KP says a driver drives her son to school daily and there is a nurse in the car and both are paid for by the government. KH says is that fair when in her position she can afford it. KP says she's paid her taxes too and it would cost a grand a day?

Can't see how it would cost a grand a day? Even if you hired a full time nurse off the NHS their salary is probably less than 30k a year.

You'll hear it on tonights show.
Trish123
26-01-2015
This is totally disgusting. Katie Price is probably in one of the top tax bands. She is not on any benefits. People on benefits with disabled child/children also get this treatment.
It's tax payers that pay for it and Katie and her entire family ARE tax payers.

Katie Hopkins needs to realise how much a disabled child in care would cost. The fact Katie has kept, loved and supported her child and raises thousands for charity to improve their lives speaks volumes. Every mum with a disabled child has to see their child suffer. It's low even for Hopkins.

That is despicable and below the belt. FFS KP lose this new found maturity and deck the old bag.
anne_666
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by WhatJoeThinks:
“Katie Hopkins blasts Katie Price over son Harvey’s treatment that 'costs government £1000 a day': “You should pay!””

Thank you! Sour grapes Hopkins.

How much taxation has Katie P handed over to the Inland Revenue, which other people benefit from? How dare she! Katie H is too dumb to understand this, of course.

She moans about people claiming benefits then has the denseness to moan about this.

You couldn't make it up!
Dutch Marlene
26-01-2015
She is right. If you have the money of course you should pay for it.
puppetangel
26-01-2015
Is Katie Price really worth 40 million :O

Thats what it says in that Mirror article.
sheila blige
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by john176bramley:
“If Hopkins said it then I think it's safe to say Michelle would agree.”



You are quite right. The Bramleys are indeed a sensible family!
Bagshot85
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by Dutch Marlene:
“She is right. If you have the money of course you should pay for it.”

Considering that KP has probably paid alot via her taxes, I think it's fair she reaps the rewards. Besides, this isn't KP we're talking about...it's her child, who should be entitled to the best care anyway, regardless of how much taxes his parents are paying.
john176bramley
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by Bagshot85:
“She pays her taxes, of course her son is entitled to all that care, regardless of whether she does or not...he's a British child.
Funny world we live in, where the better off (who pay more taxes btw,) are frowned upon when they take advantage of what's offered, yet those who contribute nothing have no problem in getting their hands on whatever they can. ”

I doubt that was the point Hopkins was making.

More than likely she meant the rich parent would pay for the very best care for their disabled child and the poor parent would be left to fend for their disabled child without any help.

Survival of the fittest and all that.
puppetangel
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by Dutch Marlene:
“She is right. If you have the money of course you should pay for it.”

It's her son who is entitled to it, he is disabled, he wont be able to work, he needs constant care.

She pays her taxes.

Why are people who didnt care at school, who have children who cant afford them, have no house of their own or limited means of earning money allowed to get benefits and a house and dont have to worry about tuition fees etc Surely those who work hard, who gave a damn a school, who gave up alot to achieve something should also benefit - otherwise why dont we all just give up.
anne_666
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by Dutch Marlene:
“She is right. If you have the money of course you should pay for it.”

Absurd. So she's probably paid millions in taxation why, exactly?
Chit_Chat15
26-01-2015
Once again, she's attacking the vulnerable in society. Disabled people should get all the funding they require.

Fgs can't we not bring kids into this ugly debacle that is Hopkins' 'opinions.'
MACTOWIN
26-01-2015
Very strange that most people in the Left Wing Mirror agree with Katie H and not Katie P. I for one will wait until I see it and in which context she said it. I don't understand why he requires a Taxi and a Nurse surely there must thousands of Children in the country with the same condition do they all get Taxis and Nurses.
Scarlett Berry
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by john176bramley:
“I doubt that was the point Hopkins was making.

More than likely she meant the rich parent would pay for the very best care for their disabled child and the poor parent would be left to fend for their disabled child without any help.

Survival of the fittest and all that.”

Did Katie Hopkins say that or are you just basing it on your own assumption.
Dextor_Morgan
26-01-2015
Talk about twisting things, someone mentioned this in another forum. It was based on the fact Harvey has a medic in the car when he is driven to school(I think it was school). Nowhere did it mention it was for treatment, KH said she thought with her money KP could pay for the medic instead of having the government pay.
I totally agree in this instance. If it's not essential and you can afford it, get your wallet out.
puppetangel
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by Chit_Chat15:
“Once again, she's attacking the vulnerable in society. Disabled people should get all the funding they require. Hopkins would rather have all disabled people round up and shot. It wouldn't surprise me. (sorry to say this, but this is Hopkins we're talking about).

Fgs can't we not bring kids into this ugly debacle that is Hopkins' 'opinions.'”

It's disgusting you saying she wants them all shot. Just because you have an irrational hatred of KH doesnt mean she's actually Satan. She just says if you can afford it, why dont you give the tax payer a break as she is in a very lucky position. It's an opinion. And Katie Price replies that she pays her taxes and her son is entitled. KP is right here. You dont have to say she wants disabled people shot, she didnt come anywhere near to saying that.
anne_666
26-01-2015
[quote=puppetangel;76658996]It's her son who is entitled to it, he is disabled, he wont be able to work, he needs constant care.

She pays her taxes.
Quote:
“Why are people who have children who cant afford them, have no house, no work or savings allowed to get benefits and a house and dont have to worry about tuition fees etc Surely those who work hard should also benefit otherwise why dont we all just give up.”

Apparently not

Or is this because idiot (and I would think jealous) Hopkins says so? It's ludicrous. She can't have it both ways. She only thinks she can.
paralax
26-01-2015
She is not attacking a disabled child, I agree with Hopkins, KP is a multi millionaire, local taxpayers via Counci Tax are paying, and that money could be used to give more support elsewhere.

It is the system that should make it a means tested benefit, or allowance.

Still, it is music to the ears of people who dislike Hopkins.
Bagshot85
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by john176bramley:
“I doubt that was the point Hopkins was making.

More than likely she meant the rich parent would pay for the very best care for their disabled child and the poor parent would be left to fend for their disabled child without any help.

Survival of the fittest and all that.”

You honestly think KH gives a shiny sh*te about 'poor parents'.......?

Anyhoo, i'm sure given her wealth, that KP has ensured her son has the best care/treatment at home, however if he's entitled to any form of other care/transport...then there's nothing wrong with her taking advantage of that.
Besides, whilst i'm not a fan of KP, I reckon KH is trying to goad her into dropping her 'the friendly girl next door' act.
<<
<
2 of 20
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map