I agree people seem to forget how Perez tortured Alexander by standing in a corner by his bed and continually coughing for ages and ages, that is a little less than torture, he then goaded the poor man until he left the show. That was far far worse than bullying or what people nowadays like to call bullying.
I now want KH to win
2 of 2
Originally Posted by Warp:
“I dislike her views outside of the house and I don't believe she genuinely believes half the stuff she says but now that Perez has basically blackmailed Big Brother into making it all about him, I've had enough and I want Katie Hopkins to win because she's been right about him since day one.
He pulled the rule book out and contributed to the removal and exits of Jeremy, Ken and Alexander, two deserved to go on on the things they did themselves but Perez was on at them from the start "I fear for my life blah blah blah".”
“I dislike her views outside of the house and I don't believe she genuinely believes half the stuff she says but now that Perez has basically blackmailed Big Brother into making it all about him, I've had enough and I want Katie Hopkins to win because she's been right about him since day one.
He pulled the rule book out and contributed to the removal and exits of Jeremy, Ken and Alexander, two deserved to go on on the things they did themselves but Perez was on at them from the start "I fear for my life blah blah blah".”
So you dislike her views but on the other hand don't believe she agrees with them which would make her a liar and a fraud! With this in mind you feel she should be rewarded with winning the show even though she is about as entertaining as a bad case of hemeroids
I hope you never have to do jury service, well especially for the poor sod on trial.
Originally Posted by missfrizzy:
“Hopkins is a nasty piece of work.
She's a big mouth outside the house, and a nasty bully inside it. She didn't have the b*lls to make enemies of the likes of Michelle and Cami li, but she used them to gang up on Perez.
What a nasty gang they are.
I know Perez can be a nightmare, and he seems a bit insane, but Hopkins is just a vile person.”
“Hopkins is a nasty piece of work.
She's a big mouth outside the house, and a nasty bully inside it. She didn't have the b*lls to make enemies of the likes of Michelle and Cami li, but she used them to gang up on Perez.
What a nasty gang they are.
I know Perez can be a nightmare, and he seems a bit insane, but Hopkins is just a vile person.”
Confuscious say, "it doesn't matter how often you repeat an untruth, it never makes it a truth".
Originally Posted by SAFC_Derry:
“So you dislike her views but on the other hand don't believe she agrees with them which would make her a liar and a fraud! With this in mind you feel she should be rewarded with winning the show even though she is about as entertaining as a bad case of hemeroids I hope you never have to do jury service, well especially for the poor sod on trial.”
“So you dislike her views but on the other hand don't believe she agrees with them which would make her a liar and a fraud! With this in mind you feel she should be rewarded with winning the show even though she is about as entertaining as a bad case of hemeroids
I hope you never have to do jury service, well especially for the poor sod on trial.”
I understand why she says those things she's a shock jock she does it for the money and exposure she gets from it. I actually find some of the things she says quite witty, that doesn't matter though, she's doing it within the confines of the game, what Perez is doing is outside the parameters of the game, blackmailing Big Brother, holding his very presence in the house hostage so he gets his own way, I think in regards to Big Brother's future and it's legacy, Perez's actions are a bigger problem that the random extreme views KH randomly puts out.
Originally Posted by Kathleen_Foster:
“I agree people seem to forget how Perez tortured Alexander by standing in a corner by his bed and continually coughing for ages and ages, that is a little less than torture, he then goaded the poor man until he left the show. That was far far worse than bullying or what people nowadays like to call bullying.”
“I agree people seem to forget how Perez tortured Alexander by standing in a corner by his bed and continually coughing for ages and ages, that is a little less than torture, he then goaded the poor man until he left the show. That was far far worse than bullying or what people nowadays like to call bullying.”
Quote:
“Originally Posted by Warp
He pulled the rule book out and contributed to the removal and exits of Jeremy, Ken and Alexander”
“Originally Posted by Warp
He pulled the rule book out and contributed to the removal and exits of Jeremy, Ken and Alexander”
Torture by coughing! What next.. And goading by happening to be there minding his own business beside the breakfast bar with everyone else when food was being consumed. The man is clearly a monster!
And pulling out the rule book! Unforgivable! Plus he made Jeremy commit a sexual offence which led to a police warning when he was removed from the house.. and obviously it was all Perez's fault that Ken was so offensive that he was removed.
I don 't get some posters on this forum. You're bonkers. lol
Originally Posted by Flora_McDonald:
“Torture by coughing! What next.. And goading by happening to be there minding his own business beside the breakfast bar with everyone else when food was being consumed. The man is clearly a monster!
And pulling out the rule book! Unforgivable! Plus he made Jeremy commit a sufficiently sexual act towards Chloe that the police issues Jeremy with a warning when he was removed from the house.. and obviously it was all his fault that Ken was so offensive that he was removed.
I don 't get some posters on this forum. You're bonkers. lol”
“Torture by coughing! What next.. And goading by happening to be there minding his own business beside the breakfast bar with everyone else when food was being consumed. The man is clearly a monster!
And pulling out the rule book! Unforgivable! Plus he made Jeremy commit a sufficiently sexual act towards Chloe that the police issues Jeremy with a warning when he was removed from the house.. and obviously it was all his fault that Ken was so offensive that he was removed.
I don 't get some posters on this forum. You're bonkers. lol”
I guess you don't know the definition of contributed or the fact I pointed out two of them had done things themselves that were enough to get them evicted, but Perez had already singled them out way before they pushed themselves over the edge (which you omitted from your quote of me).
Originally Posted by Warp:
“I dislike her views outside of the house and I don't believe she genuinely believes half the stuff she says but now that Perez has basically blackmailed Big Brother into making it all about him, I've had enough and I want Katie Hopkins to win because she's been right about him since day one.
He pulled the rule book out and contributed to the removal and exits of Jeremy, Ken and Alexander, two deserved to go on on the things they did themselves but Perez was on at them from the start "I fear for my life blah blah blah".”
“I dislike her views outside of the house and I don't believe she genuinely believes half the stuff she says but now that Perez has basically blackmailed Big Brother into making it all about him, I've had enough and I want Katie Hopkins to win because she's been right about him since day one.
He pulled the rule book out and contributed to the removal and exits of Jeremy, Ken and Alexander, two deserved to go on on the things they did themselves but Perez was on at them from the start "I fear for my life blah blah blah".”
I don't like her views (apart from the one about Katie P) but love her in there!
Originally Posted by Warp:
“I understand why she says those things she's a shock jock she does it for the money and exposure she gets from it. I actually find some of the things she says quite witty, that doesn't matter though, she's doing it within the confines of the game, what Perez is doing is outside the parameters of the game, blackmailing Big Brother, holding his very presence in the house hostage so he gets his own way, I think in regards to Big Brother's future and it's legacy, Perez's actions are a bigger problem that the random extreme views KH randomly puts out.”
“I understand why she says those things she's a shock jock she does it for the money and exposure she gets from it. I actually find some of the things she says quite witty, that doesn't matter though, she's doing it within the confines of the game, what Perez is doing is outside the parameters of the game, blackmailing Big Brother, holding his very presence in the house hostage so he gets his own way, I think in regards to Big Brother's future and it's legacy, Perez's actions are a bigger problem that the random extreme views KH randomly puts out.”
So you are basically saying Prerez's actions are such that it warrants a Hopkins win?
I'm not even going to go into the future or legacy (lol) of this heavily edited entertainment show, anyone who watched the last civilian series knows the depths they (the producers) will stoop. By the way Hopkins was prity much the same before she became a "shock jock" if the apprentice is anything to go by. What is worrying is that you think Perez (acting a bit of a twonk) which is entertaining occasionally is a bigger problem than the "random extreme views" of Hopkins.
Originally Posted by Warp:
“I guess you don't know the definition of contributed or the fact I pointed out two of them had done things themselves that were enough to get them evicted, but Perez had already singled them out way before they pushed themselves over the edge (which you omitted from your quote of me).”
“I guess you don't know the definition of contributed or the fact I pointed out two of them had done things themselves that were enough to get them evicted, but Perez had already singled them out way before they pushed themselves over the edge (which you omitted from your quote of me).”
Yeah. I know the definition of contributed.. and I disagree that Perez contributed to their eviction. They were put out because of their own issues and behaviour. Jeremy clearly has major alcohol issues, was mentally unstable and sexually assaulted Chloe, and Ken was an total arsehole. Anything Perez said to Ken or about him will be nothing to what his wife would have said to him when he got home.
Originally Posted by Flora_McDonald:
“Yeah. I know the definition of contributed.. and I disagree that Perez contributed to their eviction. They were put out because of their own issues and behaviour. Jeremy clearly has major alcohol issues, was mentally unstable and sexually assaulted Chloe, and Ken was an total arsehole. Anything Perez said to Ken or about him will be nothing to what his wife would have said to him when he got home.”
“Yeah. I know the definition of contributed.. and I disagree that Perez contributed to their eviction. They were put out because of their own issues and behaviour. Jeremy clearly has major alcohol issues, was mentally unstable and sexually assaulted Chloe, and Ken was an total arsehole. Anything Perez said to Ken or about him will be nothing to what his wife would have said to him when he got home.”
It's already known and many in the house have mentioned that Perez routinely took the rule book up to the diary room and complained to them about Jeremy and Ken, he repeatedly said he was afraid for his life and everyone was angry at the way Perez acted in regards to Alexander.
As I said I didn't say he was responsible but he contributed to how things panned out, he fanned the flames of Ken's anger, he made Big Brother question Jeremy's mental health well before he shot himself in the foot and he provoked and antagonised Alexander who hadn't done anything to deserve it.
I want Perez knocked down a peg, his ego and arrogance is overwhelming and is even more so now he has big brother wrapped around his little finger. If it takes Katie Hopkins winning then so be.
Why does Perez geting special treatment mean that Katie should win? Why her and not someone who isn't...her?
And don't you think that maybe by making it look like Perez is getting this special treatment (while he still has little chance of winning anyway) they're plotting to get viewers to vote for Katie? Trying to drive up the Katie/Perez rivalry for maximum votes like they did for Speidi/Rylan? And viewers are falling for it again?
And don't you think that maybe by making it look like Perez is getting this special treatment (while he still has little chance of winning anyway) they're plotting to get viewers to vote for Katie? Trying to drive up the Katie/Perez rivalry for maximum votes like they did for Speidi/Rylan? And viewers are falling for it again?
NOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Originally Posted by Tequila_Sunrise:
“Perez is just a joke. Katy Hopkins has more class”
“Perez is just a joke. Katy Hopkins has more class
”
Class are you Joking? !!
2 of 2
