• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Do You Believe Perez Has It in his contract to Be In The Final??
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
maureens
26-01-2015
I bloody do!!! I think it is becoming more obvious with the "twist's" the producers think up to stop evictions, and him being nominated...From day one he has shouted it out he is in the final to all the housemates gleefully..
connor the judg
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by maureens:
“I bloody do!!! I think it is becoming more obvious with the "twist's" the producers think up to stop evictions, and him being nominated...From day one he has shouted it out he is in the final to all the housemates gleefully..”

It's just terrible.
Stellen11
26-01-2015
100% I'd bet my car on it being true.
SegaGamer
26-01-2015
Oh my god, the paranoia on here is ridiculous at times.
irishcyke
26-01-2015
Even if it isn't, its obvious that he has a massively unfair advantage over the other housemates due to being protected.
MrBing
26-01-2015
You're a fool if you believe that's the case. It's fraud. These things have regulatory eyes all over them. Forum hyperbole becoming fact again. [Yawn]
Salv*
26-01-2015
Nope.

1. Fraud
2. They wouldn't have aired it if it was true
maureens
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“Oh my god, the paranoia on here is ridiculous at times.”

Obviously that must be going all the way up to the housemates as they have just said the same..(he told them)
EvieJ
26-01-2015
Not impossible but I'm assuming they're all told in negotiations to be available on final night.
SegaGamer
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by maureens:
“Obviously that must be going all the way up to the housemates as they have just said the same..(he told them)”

The HM's are always paranoid, that has been happening since the very first series.

Perez is a wind up, it doesn't surprise me one bit that he would say something like this, it doesn't make it true though.
atko
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by maureens:
“I bloody do!!! I think it is becoming more obvious with the "twist's" the producers think up to stop evictions, and him being nominated...From day one he has shouted it out he is in the final to all the housemates gleefully..”

Probably as part of Channel 5's agreement to renew a contract with Endemol given that Channel 5 is now owned by American's.
bootyache
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“Oh my god, the paranoia on here is ridiculous at times.”



It's not paranoia.


BB has been like this for years.


It'a all a con.
petewalsh_walsh
26-01-2015
No, he's just gobbing off per norm.
bootyache
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by petewalsh_walsh:
“No, he's just gobbing off per norm.”


Nah

He was taking the piss cos he knew from the start.
Ding_Batty
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by MrBing:
“You're a fool if you believe that's the case. It's fraud. These things have regulatory eyes all over them. Forum hyperbole becoming fact again. [Yawn]”

Oh do they? Care to post proof of that? I'd love to read all the regulations they have.
Janette800
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“Oh my god, the paranoia on here is ridiculous at times.”

Isn't it just
maureens
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by MrBing:
“You're a fool if you believe that's the case. It's fraud. These things have regulatory eyes all over them. Forum hyperbole becoming fact again. [Yawn]”

And your a "fool", that you dont believe BB is a fix??!! It always has been and always will be...
Scarlet O'Hara
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by maureens:
“And your a "fool", that you dont believe BB is a fix??!!”

Voters paid money to save Perez on Friday. There are regulations governing telephone voting and a regulator to police it.

You do realise that if this were true C5 would at the very least pay a ginormous fine and at worst risk its license?

And why on earth would they even air something that implicated themselves in a major illegality??
maureens
26-01-2015
Maybe he had it is his contract up until yesterday, then got his "lawyers"(well he has been asking for them a while) in and came to another agreement, like the secret house(lots of airtime) and an even BIGGER pay Cheque instead, well anything is possible
bootyache
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by Scarlet O'Hara:
“Voters paid money to save Perez on Friday. There are regulations governing telephone voting and a regulator to police it.

You do realise that if this were true C5 would at the very least pay a ginormous fine and at worst risk its license?

And why on earth would they even air something that implicated themselves in a major illegality??”


How many reality shows are real?

amyawake
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by Salv*:
“Nope.

1. Fraud
2. They wouldn't have aired it if it was true”

They might want you to say that! BB is clever, i.e. not straightforward. When Michelle mentioned about his contract, his denial lacked conviction, i.e. he wasn't outraged and his tone was rather weak and flat....I pick up on things like that.

They say paranoia is seeing things as they really are....
open heart
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by maureens:
“I bloody do!!! I think it is becoming more obvious with the "twist's" the producers think up to stop evictions, and him being nominated...From day one he has shouted it out he is in the final to all the housemates gleefully..”



Of course not.

Nobody would have such a thing in a contract in a show like this.

They appear to be keeping him and KH in, because they are providing all the drama.
Artemis1
26-01-2015
Why did they not put Perez in the house on his own.
Lots of money saved there.

Notice he swears only in the diary room which of course is shown.
I think channel 5 will have to answer for allowing the bad language in the diary room and not even saying anything to him at all.
revolver44
26-01-2015
No, Perez is king of the trolls and those dimwits would believe anything
amyawake
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by open heart:
“Of course not.

Nobody would have such a thing in a contract in a show like this.

They appear to be keeping him and KH in, because they are providing all the drama.”

I am sure years ago no-one would think BB would rig a BB winner....2 words... Helen Woods. We've had the explanation, but the truth?
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map