Oh please Nadia, stop with the bitching behind Hopkins back.

3 of 3

redcherry

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by KazzyD:
“Nadia said on launch night that her and Katie Hopkins would never get on, she's been honest and open about it, said it to KH's face, said it to everyone else, so no she's not bitching behind her back, she's reiterating what she has already said ........”

How could she say they would never get on without meeting her? Nadia's pre conceived judgement instead of waiting to see how things panned out. Katie P didn't expect to get on with Alicia and Katie H but said herself how wrong she was to have those pre conceived ideas as she found that she got along with both.

Nadia is very judgemental in my opinion

amyawake

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by MACTOWIN:
“There is another Video on the CH5 site when she is bitching with Patsy in the Bedroom about Katie. She is so Obsessed.”

2 words overused and not backed up about Nadia...obsessed and bitching. Please provide your evidence...just labels do not stand up well on their own. Back it up (if you can)

What have you all to say about Nadia mentioning in the DR that Hopkins is 2 faced? Huh???

anne_666

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by redcherry:
“How could she say they would never get on without meeting her? Nadia's pre conceived judgement instead of waiting to see how things panned out. Katie P didn't expect to get on with Alicia and Katie H but said herself how wrong she was to have those pre conceived ideas as she found that she got along with both.

Nadia is very judgemental in my opinion”

Rightly so. She like many people know what Hopkins is about. She's demonstrated it all admirably, so far.

amyawake

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by SnowStorm86:
“God. These type of threads make me dislike Hopkins even more than before.”

Indeed. This is Captain Kipper's thread - a Hopkins fan. Unfortunately those who call Nadia nasty and bitchy in comparison to Hopkins brings up the pot kettle black scenario!

cah

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by redcherry:
“Nadia went in the house with a pre conception of KH and she has closed her mind to even trying to get along with her in the house. Hope Nadia goes on Friday”

Exactly !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nadia has done nothing but Bitch about Katie.H since the day she got in there to any H/M who would Listen

I too would Love Nadia to go ,but it won't happen sadly ,The 'Loose women' have a history of doing well in BB ,and there's no-way Nadia will go while Cami-Li is in the mix

redcherry

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by anne_666:
“Rightly so. She like many people know what Hopkins is about. She's demonstrated it all admirably, so far.”

How could she know before she had met her? Unless she pre judged her. I'm not sticking up for KH by the way! Imo, Nadia is too judgemental. She went in there determined to dislike KH no matter what

MACTOWIN

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by amyawake:
“2 words overused and not backed up about Nadia...obsessed and bitching. Please provide your evidence...just labels do not stand up well on their own. Back it up (if you can)

What have you all to say about Nadia mentioning in the DR that Hopkins is 2 faced? Huh???”

Have you watched the Video.

amyawake

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by redcherry:
“How could she know before she had met her? Unless she pre judged her. I'm not sticking up for KH by the way! Imo, Nadia is too judgemental. She went in there determined to dislike KH no matter what”

.........no, NOT no matter what. Remember Nadia declared she has somewhat modified her opinion now that she has met Hopkins, hence the clean slate offering? Selective memory?

SnowStorm86

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by amyawake:
“Indeed. This is Captain Kipper's thread - a Hopkins fan. Unfortunately those who call Nadia nasty and bitchy in comparison to Hopkins brings up the pot kettle black scenario! ”

It just encourages me to vote more for Nadia.

amyawake

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by MACTOWIN:
“Have you watched the Video.”

That's a copout. Are you unable to say what you mean specifically? Yes I watched the whole programme and you didn't answer my question about what do you have to say about Nadia exposing Hopkins as being 2 faced (during the nominations)

amyawake

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by SnowStorm86:
“It just encourages me to vote more for Nadia.”

Yay! Welcome aboard!

anne_666

26-01-2015

There is enough out there to know exactly what she is. Who on earth would want to associate with such a far right snob? Just one example of a Hopkins press interview.

http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-ra...kins-interview

Quote:
“If you managed to miss all of that, you would get an idea of her style from her reply when I ask if she'd call herself a snob. "Oh, definitely yeah, 100%. I think it's really important to be snobby. Do I think social mobility policy will ever work? Absolutely not. Is social class a much more efficient way of getting people to the top? Absolutely. Social class has worked for years. Born into the right family, go to the right schools, even if you're not super bright to start with, you'll turn out bright. You go to the right university, you get the right job, you have the right connections, you'll make it to the top. Job done, very efficient."

Efficient at what? "Efficient at getting smart, well-connected people to the top. It is efficient, because what public money was required to move those people to the top? None." That would depend on whether we want the best people at the top, surely, or just the cheapest way to get some people to fill up the top? "Oh, for goodness sake," she exclaims impatiently. "It's this whole state school thing: 'Oh, there are a couple of bright sparks, let's invest £50m trying to get the two or three that might achieve to the top.' Or, shall we take really clever people and not have to spend any money on them, and get them to the top because they're connected and went to brilliant schools and their families will support them and they're fantastic? So why bother with social mobility? Why does it matter? Why? Why? I don't understand the obsession with it."”

redcherry

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by amyawake:
“.........no, NOT no matter what. Remember Nadia declared she has somewhat modified her opinion now that she has met Hopkins, hence the clean slate offering? Selective memory?”

Pity she herself didn't remember the clean state when she continued to moan and bitch about KH behind her back. Nadia says one thing and does another.

redcherry

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by anne_666:
“There is enough out there to know exactly what she is. Who on earth would want to associate with such a far right snob? Just one example of a Hopkins press interview.

http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-ra...kins-interview”

Its called pre judging someone based on what you've read before you have met them. Do you honestly believe everything you read?

Anyhow we are supposed to be judging them on how they are in the house

claire33

26-01-2015

And Katie H has never bitched about Nadia or others behind their backs eh

anne_666

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by redcherry:
“Its called pre judging someone based on what you've read before you have met them. Do you honestly believe everything you read?

Anyhow we are supposed to be judging them on how they are in the house”

No I don't believe everything I read by any means. That is from a reliable source, her own words and nothing new in the history of this woman and her live interviews or the press. "Judging them in the house" seems to be a preferential opinion and changes like the wind depending on favourites.

anne_666

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by claire33:
“And Katie H has never bitched about Nadia or others behind their backs eh ”

Is there anyone she hasn't been two faced about since day 1? I think not.

amyawake

26-01-2015

Originally Posted by redcherry:
“Pity she herself didn't remember the clean state when she continued to moan and bitch about KH behind her back. Nadia says one thing and does another.”

Nadia reacts to a situation e.g. Hopkins baiting her...go figure.
Hopkins agreed to the clean slate so you could just as truthfully say that Hopkins says one thing and does another.

3 of 3