DS Forums

 
 

The Blatant Fixing To Keep Perez In The House


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26-01-2015, 22:36
SegaGamer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
ok what other hm is being favoured this year?
Katie Hopkins right from the start was given a task to put 2 or 3 people up. All she had to do was keep this secret and she wouldn't face being up for eviction. Why should she get to be the only one to nominate ? how is that fair ?
SegaGamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 26-01-2015, 22:36
Stellen11
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 7,584
Why are they bothering with this farce, more than 1 HM have stated Perez claims its in his contract that he is in the final.
I wonder why they have shown us these clips? They really couldnt care less what the viewers think.
Stellen11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2015, 22:36
4troy7
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,502
So were you just as annoyed when Katie was getting special treatment ?
Do I need repeat myself ?
4troy7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2015, 22:40
SegaGamer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
Do I need repeat myself ?
No, but it you are proving my point by not answering.

You get annoyed when someone you dislike get's favourable treatment but if it's your fave getting it you are happy. It's called double standards.
SegaGamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2015, 22:41
intoxication
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,283
Seeing as the likes of Calum and Nadia managed to get more votes to stay than him on Friday, they are really kicking it into over drive.
Did Emma actually announce that Perez and Alicia were bottom two? I know Callum and Nadia were announced first but sure there was no advert or more highlights and the evictee was announced straight away. So if she was reading them in random order it doesn't necessarily mean Nadia and Callum were on top?
intoxication is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-01-2015, 22:47
connor the judg
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 8,770
I find it so annoying why is he allowed to not only not be nominated this next eviction and go to a secret house but also have the opportunity of getting a pass to the final . I think they genuinely thought he was going to walk to thought of this secret house to keep him sweet and to keep him in .
SAME!!
connor the judg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 00:52
planets
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: goo goo ka choo
Posts: 25,475
He told them thats how they know.
But everyone, even his supporters, admit that Perez is a massive wind up merchant, keeping that in mind. what on earth makes you think he would give accurate details of his contract to people who have been quite open about loathing him?
That doesn't make sense even if i take a shed load of drugs.
planets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 10:30
gentleguy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,307
Did Emma actually announce that Perez and Alicia were bottom two? I know Callum and Nadia were announced first but sure there was no advert or more highlights and the evictee was announced straight away. So if she was reading them in random order it doesn't necessarily mean Nadia and Callum were on top?
yes she did they always do that alicia and perez were bottom 2.
gentleguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 10:31
gentleguy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,307
Katie Hopkins right from the start was given a task to put 2 or 3 people up. All she had to do was keep this secret and she wouldn't face being up for eviction. Why should she get to be the only one to nominate ? how is that fair ?
wasnt watching then but fair enough if thats the case in my opinion thats wrong too. they clearly wanted perez and katie to stay in.
gentleguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 10:39
lynzee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,886
I just can't stand to watch any more. It makes a mockery of its audience.
It doesn't make a mockery of its audience. Personally, although I don't particularly like Perez, I do find him entertaining and that he is keeping the show entertaining to watch.

It does however, make a mockery of the voters, that is why I doubt that I will ever vote again. The last time I voted was when Aaron won BB and that is one time that we, the voters made the decision who won, in spite of everything BB tried to make the outcome different. They have never forgiven him for it, hence he is never mentioned on any BB show.
lynzee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 10:47
wotnot
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Strangetown
Posts: 8,074
Were you also annoyed by Katie H being saved from being up for eviction twice?
Exactly! They know there would be no show without Perez or Hopkins, I am not saying it's right to give certain people preferences but if Hopkins is allowed then I am glad Perez is gettng it too.
wotnot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 11:40
Monty_Brewster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,232
A lot of people on this forum will like foolish when Perez is voted to face eviction every week.
Monty_Brewster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 11:42
jeanoj
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Posts: 19,833
So were you just as annoyed when Katie was getting special treatment ?
What special treatment? Katie P removed her from nominations and that was neither BB's decision nor Katie's (H). She was allowed to choose two up for eviction on the first night but this has been done before and I don't view it as "special treatment". Perez is being offered a chance to be in the final when many of us just want him out as he is a childish irritant and has spoiled the show for some of the housemates. Nadia was having fun without him and her popularity increased. When he is back tonight, if she continues mothering Perez as before, she will go back to being disliked.
jeanoj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 12:19
Flora_McDonald
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 780
I think the LOP has the entirely wrong idea. Perez would never in a million years have gone out this week, so it is far more interesting to have the others forced to nominate someone different.

BB has done this solely so that the HMs cannot nominate Perez as an easy option. The viewers will vote on whether he should automatically be nominated every single week, or get a pass to the final... and the way it's looking at the moment, it's more likely that he'll be nominated every week. It's up to the viewers to choose that. MEANWHILE... the other housemates will have to choose someone else to nominate, and it will cause more splintering, tension and drama within the group.. as it already has.

Evil genius.
Flora_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 12:32
sherisgirl
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 1,269
Agree

Cannot see public voting him out yet anyway, Nadia needs to go 1st, just as long as they do not vote him the winner.

But the producers doing this to save him from the vote is totally underhanded, if he wants to walk let him, then he does not get paid, so they are not losing any money, how many more americans are we having to put up with in CBB who have a hissy fit and start screaming for their lawyers
sherisgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 12:43
SG-1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 16,046
He told them thats how they know.
LOL.

So in this great fix of a housemate signing a legal document in which it states he will be in the final all other housemates will just sit back and say thats ok then.
And how silly of C5 editors not to edit out HMs mentioning it...you would think they would be more careful than letting us viewers know they fixed it for a HM by putting it into his contract he will be in the final.
I think how silly of them also to allow him to be up for eviction last week,I mean he could have gone home and then sued them for breach of contract.
Maybe they fixed the phoneline as well just so they would make sure he didnt get evicted.
SG-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 13:08
sodafountain
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wrexham
Posts: 12,102
Did Emma actually announce that Perez and Alicia were bottom two? I know Callum and Nadia were announced first but sure there was no advert or more highlights and the evictee was announced straight away. So if she was reading them in random order it doesn't necessarily mean Nadia and Callum were on top?
She did the reverse didn't she?

I thought she said "the 2 house mates with the highest votes, and are therefore safe, are", and then went on to announce Callum and Nadia.

Therefore, the other 2 had to have the least votes.
sodafountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 13:13
Monty_Brewster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,232
Production team = w*nkers. C5 = massive *******!! I pity them.
This is a bit rude. Sure, moan about the show but this language is unnecessary.
Monty_Brewster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 13:27
AA2009
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,252
It's vote to save. They don't need to "fix it" for Perez. If anything they're doing this so that more outraged Perez-haters will vote for Katie Hopkins to win.
AA2009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 13:33
fredster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 23,464
I genuinely wonder if the producers have a mischief-making intent with viewers that borders on contempt. They don't even pretend any more.

They know there was anger last year about the killer nomination and pass to the final, so what do they do? Repeat it.

They know there was anger about Helen being arbitrarily put in a secret room, so what do they do? Repeat it.

They know a lot of us aren't keen on all the outside interference yet that's become a recurring trick.

They must rub their hands in glee when there's uproar.
I have said that since the Helen woods fiasco that the producers are sticking two fingers up at the public.i wish people would play them at their own game and not vote.
fredster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 13:34
fredster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 23,464
This is a bit rude. Sure, moan about the show but this language is unnecessary.
Perez uses language like that at big brother in the diary room.
fredster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 13:40
Monty_Brewster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,232
Just because language is used in the house in the street or in TV doesn't mean it belongs on a forum. There's no need to be so ruse to the show's producers. They have hardly killed or cat. it's just a show.
Monty_Brewster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 14:15
Scamps8
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 623
Were you also annoyed by Katie H being saved from being up for eviction twice?
t

And annoyed that Perez was saved by being king
Scamps8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 14:44
mmpfb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,891
Not everything is about Katie vs Perez I'm talking about Perez not Katie.
And it's not at all possible that he was talking BS to big himself up, as he has a tendency to do. Or that one of them has made it up or misheard, then told the other, who then goes on to tell everybody.

Why are you accepting it as a truth without questioning it? Especially as if it were true they would be extremely unlikely to include talk of it in the highlights show lest it shines a light on questionable practices?
mmpfb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-01-2015, 14:54
griffin5779
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 938
A lot of people on this forum will like foolish when Perez is voted to face eviction every week.
Fact is..Perez was going to face every eviction anyway...He is very much disliked by the majority of the house.
So no matter how they spin it there is no downside for Perez....Just a chance for a pass to the final that the other don't have
griffin5779 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:16.