Katie Hopkins right from the start was given a task to put 2 or 3 people up. All she had to do was keep this secret and she wouldn't face being up for eviction. Why should she get to be the only one to nominate ? how is that fair ?

I wonder why they have shown us these clips? They really couldnt care less what the viewers think.

Do I need repeat myself ?

No, but it you are proving my point by not answering.

You get annoyed when someone you dislike get's favourable treatment but if it's your fave getting it you are happy. It's called double standards.

Did Emma actually announce that Perez and Alicia were bottom two? I know Callum and Nadia were announced first but sure there was no advert or more highlights and the evictee was announced straight away. So if she was reading them in random order it doesn't necessarily mean Nadia and Callum were on top?

SAME!!

But everyone, even his supporters, admit that Perez is a massive wind up merchant, keeping that in mind. what on earth makes you think he would give accurate details of his contract to people who have been quite open about loathing him?
That doesn't make sense even if i take a shed load of drugs.

yes she did they always do that alicia and perez were bottom 2.

wasnt watching then but fair enough if thats the case in my opinion thats wrong too. they clearly wanted perez and katie to stay in.

It doesn't make a mockery of its audience. Personally, although I don't particularly like Perez, I do find him entertaining and that he is keeping the show entertaining to watch.

It does however, make a mockery of the voters, that is why I doubt that I will ever vote again. The last time I voted was when Aaron won BB and that is one time that we, the voters made the decision who won, in spite of everything BB tried to make the outcome different. They have never forgiven him for it, hence he is never mentioned on any BB show.

Exactly! They know there would be no show without Perez or Hopkins, I am not saying it's right to give certain people preferences but if Hopkins is allowed then I am glad Perez is gettng it too.

A lot of people on this forum will like foolish when Perez is voted to face eviction every week.

What special treatment? Katie P removed her from nominations and that was neither BB's decision nor Katie's (H). She was allowed to choose two up for eviction on the first night but this has been done before and I don't view it as "special treatment". Perez is being offered a chance to be in the final when many of us just want him out as he is a childish irritant and has spoiled the show for some of the housemates. Nadia was having fun without him and her popularity increased. When he is back tonight, if she continues mothering Perez as before, she will go back to being disliked.

I think the LOP has the entirely wrong idea. Perez would never in a million years have gone out this week, so it is far more interesting to have the others forced to nominate someone different.

BB has done this solely so that the HMs cannot nominate Perez as an easy option. The viewers will vote on whether he should automatically be nominated every single week, or get a pass to the final... and the way it's looking at the moment, it's more likely that he'll be nominated every week. It's up to the viewers to choose that. MEANWHILE... the other housemates will have to choose someone else to nominate, and it will cause more splintering, tension and drama within the group.. as it already has.

Evil genius.

Agree

Cannot see public voting him out yet anyway, Nadia needs to go 1st, just as long as they do not vote him the winner.

But the producers doing this to save him from the vote is totally underhanded, if he wants to walk let him, then he does not get paid, so they are not losing any money, how many more americans are we having to put up with in CBB who have a hissy fit and start screaming for their lawyers

LOL.

So in this great fix of a housemate signing a legal document in which it states he will be in the final all other housemates will just sit back and say thats ok then.
And how silly of C5 editors not to edit out HMs mentioning it...you would think they would be more careful than letting us viewers know they fixed it for a HM by putting it into his contract he will be in the final.
I think how silly of them also to allow him to be up for eviction last week,I mean he could have gone home and then sued them for breach of contract.
Maybe they fixed the phoneline as well just so they would make sure he didnt get evicted.

She did the reverse didn't she?

I thought she said "the 2 house mates with the highest votes, and are therefore safe, are", and then went on to announce Callum and Nadia.

Therefore, the other 2 had to have the least votes.

This is a bit rude. Sure, moan about the show but this language is unnecessary.

It's vote to save. They don't need to "fix it" for Perez. If anything they're doing this so that more outraged Perez-haters will vote for Katie Hopkins to win.

I have said that since the Helen woods fiasco that the producers are sticking two fingers up at the public.i wish people would play them at their own game and not vote.

Perez uses language like that at big brother in the diary room.

Just because language is used in the house in the street or in TV doesn't mean it belongs on a forum. There's no need to be so ruse to the show's producers. They have hardly killed or cat. it's just a show.

t

And annoyed that Perez was saved by being king

And it's not at all possible that he was talking BS to big himself up, as he has a tendency to do. Or that one of them has made it up or misheard, then told the other, who then goes on to tell everybody.

Why are you accepting it as a truth without questioning it? Especially as if it were true they would be extremely unlikely to include talk of it in the highlights show lest it shines a light on questionable practices?

Fact is..Perez was going to face every eviction anyway...He is very much disliked by the majority of the house.
So no matter how they spin it there is no downside for Perez....Just a chance for a pass to the final that the other don't have