|
||||||||
The Blatant Fixing To Keep Perez In The House |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,891
|
Quote:
t
And annoyed that Perez was saved by being king ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,981
|
It really is sickening that they are giving him preferential treatment.
At least with Helen, they didn't pick and choose who was getting the pass to the final, it just happened to be the horrible Pauline. I really hate what BB is becoming or already is, it's making me want to stop watching. I find myself just listening to BB in the background as I play my Wii U lately. |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: OP is a murderer!!
Posts: 27,205
|
How much money was he paid? Going by his rant last night it is more than KP
![]() He does seem to hold court with BB it is so fixed for him to stay
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 184
|
Quote:
Fact is..Perez was going to face every eviction anyway...He is very much disliked by the majority of the house.
So no matter how they spin it there is no downside for Perez....Just a chance for a pass to the final that the other don't have |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,039
|
It stands to reason that if they have paid Perez or any zleb a huge amount to be on CBB they are going to make sure they stay to the end, no matter what. Perez would know that and so will the others. When Perez says it was written in his contract , he is right, it was written on the wall before he even entered the house. At the end of the day, the producers have to get value for the money they have shelled out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: goo goo ka choo
Posts: 25,475
|
Quote:
It stands to reason that if they have paid Perez or any zleb a huge amount to be on CBB they are going to make sure they stay to the end, no matter what. Perez would know that and so will the others. When Perez says it was written in his contract , he is right, it was written on the wall before he even entered the house. At the end of the day, the producers have to get value for the money they have shelled out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,039
|
Quote:
who was the boxer who got paid shed loads but was ejected really quickly in an earlier series? can anyone remember his name?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: goo goo ka choo
Posts: 25,475
|
Quote:
Evander Holyfield? Just googled it. I didn't see that cbb last year but it sounds like he was chosen for eviction by two other hms in a secret room. He made homophobic comments lprior to that and there were calls for him to be removed from the house. Hmmmm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 13,776
|
Quote:
I find it so annoying why is he allowed to not only not be nominated this next eviction and go to a secret house but also have the opportunity of getting a pass to the final . I think they genuinely thought he was going to walk to thought of this secret house to keep him sweet and to keep him in .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,039
|
Quote:
oooo thanks Kiteflyer i knew there was someone who was a big name contestant and had a very early exit!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 7,126
|
Quote:
Oh here we go. No wonder why people don't take the fans of this show seriously. If it's your fave getting special treatment you are fine with it but once it is someone you dislike the toys get thrown out of the pram. Well here's a shocker for you, you can't have it both ways.
If my favourite - KH - was given immunity for no apparent reason, moved to a secret house and given the chance of a pass to the final, I would be happy, but equally wondering why she was chosen, how was that decided and so on. It's clearly designed to protect Perez after he didn't do as well in the vote as they expected. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Smiley Ho ☺♪♫
Posts: 9,693
|
Quote:
It' doesn't feel like Big Brother is in charge anymore, obviously trying to keep Perez in and adding Twists as and when it suits them to make sure it happens, that's Channel 5 for you, I sometimes forget that it isn't the same show as Channel 4
They bloody INVENTED meddling! |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 7,126
|
Quote:
What, that Channel 4 that stuck Nikki back in the house after the GBP spent good money getting rid of the gurning little troll?
They bloody INVENTED meddling! This is ridiculous. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 73
|
I would love to see him going back in, declaring he was selected for the secret room by the public, I hope he deliberately winds up the vultures to the max and really give them something to whine about
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Smiley Ho ☺♪♫
Posts: 9,693
|
Quote:
But that was down to VOTES from the PUBLIC. They didn't just say "Here's Nicki. She's going back in." they said "Here's the evicted HM's, vote one back in". We still had a say. We didn't have a say in Perez getting immunity - an online poll which can be messed with easily without trace isn't a say either before someone tries justifying that.
This is ridiculous. And making her eligible for the prize money wasn't an outrageous idea too? I'm not saying it's exactly the same thing, I said that C4 did their fair share of meddling and invented it. I stand by that statement because it's true. |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 21
|
I don't see how they can give Perez a free pass to the final. This would surely go against the other HMs' contracts, not to mention cheating all the viewers who have been voting for someone in the expectation that they will make it to the final on equal terms with other HMs. Anyone who's been voting for KH or KC, for instance, could argue that their money had been mis-used, if there turned out to be a secret uneven playing field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 7,126
|
Quote:
Oh so putting her back in had nowt whatsoever to do with C4 and that Princess Nikki shite they were filming?
And making her eligible for the prize money wasn't an outrageous idea too? I'm not saying it's exactly the same thing, I said that C4 did their fair share of meddling and invented it. I stand by that statement because it's true. We had NO say in the immunity Perez was handed and the control over nominations. It's so ridiculous. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Smiley Ho ☺♪♫
Posts: 9,693
|
Quote:
Of course it did, but WE had the CHOICE to vote someone ELSE in. We chose Nicki to go back in - it could've been any of the other options.
We had NO say in the immunity Perez was handed and the control over nominations. It's so ridiculous. Also, I thought the voters via the app get to choose if Perez goes through to the final OR goes up every week??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,891
|
Quote:
But that was down to VOTES from the PUBLIC. They didn't just say "Here's Nicki. She's going back in." they said "Here's the evicted HM's, vote one back in". We still had a say. We didn't have a say in Perez getting immunity - an online poll which can be messed with easily without trace isn't a say either before someone tries justifying that.
This is ridiculous. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 7,126
|
Quote:
When it turns out he hasn't go immunity and is indeed going to be up for eviction continually, are you still going to be so outraged?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,204
|
The fact is BB kept him out of tonight's eviction and he probably would have gone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 7,126
|
Quote:
Hang on a minute................I don't have encyclopaedic knowledge of BB like some in here but I thought Aislene was the person (or one of them) who chose Nikki to go back in???
Also, I thought the voters via the app get to choose if Perez goes through to the final OR goes up every week??? They are voting between those two options, which is ridiculous. Voting via an app that not all viewers can get - therefore cannot vote in - which we will never be able to know the results properly - as it's free there wouldn't be an uproar if it did turn out it was fixed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,891
|
Quote:
Yes. Definitely. He should't of been given immunity. He shouldn't be given a pass and the only people that should be nominating him are the HM's. Not us.
i.e. what I'm really asking is are you pissed off because you're a Hopkins fan, and therefore Perez is the devil? |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 8,770
|
Quote:
Were you also annoyed by Katie H being saved from being up for eviction twice?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,295
|
Quote:
Fact is..Perez was going to face every eviction anyway...He is very much disliked by the majority of the house.
So no matter how they spin it there is no downside for Perez....Just a chance for a pass to the final that the other don't have Spreads the love out. Which always leads to such interesting things. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:16.





