Originally Posted by Scamps8:
“t
And annoyed that Perez was saved by being king
”
“t
And annoyed that Perez was saved by being king
”
Ah well, you can lay that one directly at the gnarly feet of Cami Li
The Blatant Fixing To Keep Perez In The House
3 of 4
It really is sickening that they are giving him preferential treatment.
At least with Helen, they didn't pick and choose who was getting the pass to the final, it just happened to be the horrible Pauline.
I really hate what BB is becoming or already is, it's making me want to stop watching. I find myself just listening to BB in the background as I play my Wii U lately.
At least with Helen, they didn't pick and choose who was getting the pass to the final, it just happened to be the horrible Pauline.
I really hate what BB is becoming or already is, it's making me want to stop watching. I find myself just listening to BB in the background as I play my Wii U lately.
How much money was he paid? Going by his rant last night it is more than KP 
He does seem to hold court with BB it is so fixed for him to stay
He does seem to hold court with BB it is so fixed for him to stay
Originally Posted by griffin5779:
“Fact is..Perez was going to face every eviction anyway...He is very much disliked by the majority of the house.
So no matter how they spin it there is no downside for Perez....Just a chance for a pass to the final that the other don't have”
“Fact is..Perez was going to face every eviction anyway...He is very much disliked by the majority of the house.
So no matter how they spin it there is no downside for Perez....Just a chance for a pass to the final that the other don't have”
This ^^^
It stands to reason that if they have paid Perez or any zleb a huge amount to be on CBB they are going to make sure they stay to the end, no matter what. Perez would know that and so will the others. When Perez says it was written in his contract , he is right, it was written on the wall before he even entered the house. At the end of the day, the producers have to get value for the money they have shelled out.
Originally Posted by kiteflyer:
“It stands to reason that if they have paid Perez or any zleb a huge amount to be on CBB they are going to make sure they stay to the end, no matter what. Perez would know that and so will the others. When Perez says it was written in his contract , he is right, it was written on the wall before he even entered the house. At the end of the day, the producers have to get value for the money they have shelled out.”
“It stands to reason that if they have paid Perez or any zleb a huge amount to be on CBB they are going to make sure they stay to the end, no matter what. Perez would know that and so will the others. When Perez says it was written in his contract , he is right, it was written on the wall before he even entered the house. At the end of the day, the producers have to get value for the money they have shelled out.”
who was the boxer who got paid shed loads but was ejected really quickly in an earlier series? can anyone remember his name?
Originally Posted by planets:
“who was the boxer who got paid shed loads but was ejected really quickly in an earlier series? can anyone remember his name?”
“who was the boxer who got paid shed loads but was ejected really quickly in an earlier series? can anyone remember his name?”
Evander Holyfield? Just googled it. I didn't see that cbb last year but it sounds like he was chosen for eviction by two other hms in a secret room. He made homophobic comments lprior to that and there were calls for him to be removed from the house. Hmmmm.
Originally Posted by kiteflyer:
“Evander Holyfield? Just googled it. I didn't see that cbb last year but it sounds like he was chosen for eviction by two other hms in a secret room. He made homophobic comments lprior to that and there were calls for him to be removed from the house. Hmmmm.”
“Evander Holyfield? Just googled it. I didn't see that cbb last year but it sounds like he was chosen for eviction by two other hms in a secret room. He made homophobic comments lprior to that and there were calls for him to be removed from the house. Hmmmm.”
oooo thanks Kiteflyer i knew there was someone who was a big name contestant and had a very early exit!
Originally Posted by 4troy7:
“I find it so annoying why is he allowed to not only not be nominated this next eviction and go to a secret house but also have the opportunity of getting a pass to the final . I think they genuinely thought he was going to walk to thought of this secret house to keep him sweet and to keep him in .”
“I find it so annoying why is he allowed to not only not be nominated this next eviction and go to a secret house but also have the opportunity of getting a pass to the final . I think they genuinely thought he was going to walk to thought of this secret house to keep him sweet and to keep him in .”
Well i for one am glad hes in the secret room, without him in the show it would be a total bore.
Originally Posted by planets:
“oooo thanks Kiteflyer i knew there was someone who was a big name contestant and had a very early exit!”
“oooo thanks Kiteflyer i knew there was someone who was a big name contestant and had a very early exit!”
Looks like they had no choice but to engineer an eviction for him
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“Oh here we go. No wonder why people don't take the fans of this show seriously. If it's your fave getting special treatment you are fine with it but once it is someone you dislike the toys get thrown out of the pram. Well here's a shocker for you, you can't have it both ways.”
“Oh here we go. No wonder why people don't take the fans of this show seriously. If it's your fave getting special treatment you are fine with it but once it is someone you dislike the toys get thrown out of the pram. Well here's a shocker for you, you can't have it both ways.”
You can't speak for everyone like that.
If my favourite - KH - was given immunity for no apparent reason, moved to a secret house and given the chance of a pass to the final, I would be happy, but equally wondering why she was chosen, how was that decided and so on.
It's clearly designed to protect Perez after he didn't do as well in the vote as they expected.
Originally Posted by Grant_Gilmour:
“It' doesn't feel like Big Brother is in charge anymore, obviously trying to keep Perez in and adding Twists as and when it suits them to make sure it happens, that's Channel 5 for you, I sometimes forget that it isn't the same show as Channel 4”
“It' doesn't feel like Big Brother is in charge anymore, obviously trying to keep Perez in and adding Twists as and when it suits them to make sure it happens, that's Channel 5 for you, I sometimes forget that it isn't the same show as Channel 4”
What, that Channel 4 that stuck Nikki back in the house after the GBP spent good money getting rid of the gurning little troll?
They bloody INVENTED meddling!
Originally Posted by Bunions:
“What, that Channel 4 that stuck Nikki back in the house after the GBP spent good money getting rid of the gurning little troll?
They bloody INVENTED meddling!”
“What, that Channel 4 that stuck Nikki back in the house after the GBP spent good money getting rid of the gurning little troll?
They bloody INVENTED meddling!”
But that was down to VOTES from the PUBLIC. They didn't just say "Here's Nicki. She's going back in." they said "Here's the evicted HM's, vote one back in". We still had a say. We didn't have a say in Perez getting immunity - an online poll which can be messed with easily without trace isn't a say either before someone tries justifying that.
This is ridiculous.
I would love to see him going back in, declaring he was selected for the secret room by the public, I hope he deliberately winds up the vultures to the max and really give them something to whine about
Originally Posted by IsThisHappiness:
“But that was down to VOTES from the PUBLIC. They didn't just say "Here's Nicki. She's going back in." they said "Here's the evicted HM's, vote one back in". We still had a say. We didn't have a say in Perez getting immunity - an online poll which can be messed with easily without trace isn't a say either before someone tries justifying that.
This is ridiculous.”
“But that was down to VOTES from the PUBLIC. They didn't just say "Here's Nicki. She's going back in." they said "Here's the evicted HM's, vote one back in". We still had a say. We didn't have a say in Perez getting immunity - an online poll which can be messed with easily without trace isn't a say either before someone tries justifying that.
This is ridiculous.”
Oh so putting her back in had nowt whatsoever to do with C4 and that Princess Nikki shite they were filming?
And making her eligible for the prize money wasn't an outrageous idea too?
I'm not saying it's exactly the same thing, I said that C4 did their fair share of meddling and invented it.
I stand by that statement because it's true.
I don't see how they can give Perez a free pass to the final. This would surely go against the other HMs' contracts, not to mention cheating all the viewers who have been voting for someone in the expectation that they will make it to the final on equal terms with other HMs. Anyone who's been voting for KH or KC, for instance, could argue that their money had been mis-used, if there turned out to be a secret uneven playing field.
Originally Posted by Bunions:
“Oh so putting her back in had nowt whatsoever to do with C4 and that Princess Nikki shite they were filming?
And making her eligible for the prize money wasn't an outrageous idea too?
I'm not saying it's exactly the same thing, I said that C4 did their fair share of meddling and invented it.
I stand by that statement because it's true.”
“Oh so putting her back in had nowt whatsoever to do with C4 and that Princess Nikki shite they were filming?
And making her eligible for the prize money wasn't an outrageous idea too?
I'm not saying it's exactly the same thing, I said that C4 did their fair share of meddling and invented it.
I stand by that statement because it's true.”
Of course it did, but WE had the CHOICE to vote someone ELSE in. We chose Nicki to go back in - it could've been any of the other options.
We had NO say in the immunity Perez was handed and the control over nominations. It's so ridiculous.
Originally Posted by IsThisHappiness:
“Of course it did, but WE had the CHOICE to vote someone ELSE in. We chose Nicki to go back in - it could've been any of the other options.
We had NO say in the immunity Perez was handed and the control over nominations. It's so ridiculous.”
“Of course it did, but WE had the CHOICE to vote someone ELSE in. We chose Nicki to go back in - it could've been any of the other options.
We had NO say in the immunity Perez was handed and the control over nominations. It's so ridiculous.”
Hang on a minute................I don't have encyclopaedic knowledge of BB like some in here but I thought Aislene was the person (or one of them) who chose Nikki to go back in???
Also, I thought the voters via the app get to choose if Perez goes through to the final OR goes up every week???
Originally Posted by IsThisHappiness:
“But that was down to VOTES from the PUBLIC. They didn't just say "Here's Nicki. She's going back in." they said "Here's the evicted HM's, vote one back in". We still had a say. We didn't have a say in Perez getting immunity - an online poll which can be messed with easily without trace isn't a say either before someone tries justifying that.
This is ridiculous.”
“But that was down to VOTES from the PUBLIC. They didn't just say "Here's Nicki. She's going back in." they said "Here's the evicted HM's, vote one back in". We still had a say. We didn't have a say in Perez getting immunity - an online poll which can be messed with easily without trace isn't a say either before someone tries justifying that.
This is ridiculous.”
When it turns out he hasn't go immunity and is indeed going to be up for eviction continually, are you still going to be so outraged?
Originally Posted by mmpfb:
“When it turns out he hasn't go immunity and is indeed going to be up for eviction continually, are you still going to be so outraged?”
“When it turns out he hasn't go immunity and is indeed going to be up for eviction continually, are you still going to be so outraged?”
Yes. Definitely. He should't of been given immunity. He shouldn't be given a pass and the only people that should be nominating him are the HM's. Not us.
Originally Posted by Bunions:
“Hang on a minute................I don't have encyclopaedic knowledge of BB like some in here but I thought Aislene was the person (or one of them) who chose Nikki to go back in???
Also, I thought the voters via the app get to choose if Perez goes through to the final OR goes up every week???”
“Hang on a minute................I don't have encyclopaedic knowledge of BB like some in here but I thought Aislene was the person (or one of them) who chose Nikki to go back in???
Also, I thought the voters via the app get to choose if Perez goes through to the final OR goes up every week???”
Pretty sure she got like 60+% of a vote to be put back into the house - but she was in a secret house first.
They are voting between those two options, which is ridiculous. Voting via an app that not all viewers can get - therefore cannot vote in - which we will never be able to know the results properly - as it's free there wouldn't be an uproar if it did turn out it was fixed.
Originally Posted by IsThisHappiness:
“Yes. Definitely. He should't of been given immunity. He shouldn't be given a pass and the only people that should be nominating him are the HM's. Not us.”
“Yes. Definitely. He should't of been given immunity. He shouldn't be given a pass and the only people that should be nominating him are the HM's. Not us.”
I'm not sure if you read my question correctly. I asked that if he is up for eviction all the time from now on (which is more than likely), will you still be bemoaning the meddling?
i.e. what I'm really asking is are you pissed off because you're a Hopkins fan, and therefore Perez is the devil?
Originally Posted by mmpfb:
“Were you also annoyed by Katie H being saved from being up for eviction twice?”
“Were you also annoyed by Katie H being saved from being up for eviction twice?”
It was ONCE and by a housemate not BB!
Originally Posted by griffin5779:
“Fact is..Perez was going to face every eviction anyway...He is very much disliked by the majority of the house.
So no matter how they spin it there is no downside for Perez....Just a chance for a pass to the final that the other don't have”
“Fact is..Perez was going to face every eviction anyway...He is very much disliked by the majority of the house.
So no matter how they spin it there is no downside for Perez....Just a chance for a pass to the final that the other don't have”
Whichever way it goes, it's best for the show. That's why they've done it. If they nominate as normal, he will always be up for eviction. With this action (again, whichever way it goes) it forces the housemates to not focus on him, and nominate someone other than Perez. As they would. Every. Single. Time.
Spreads the love out. Which always leads to such interesting things.
3 of 4
