Originally Posted by coke_pepper:
“OK so on that correction regarding Katie Hopkins statement that the state should not be contributing to Katie Price's sons health and wellbeing whether it be in part or whole, do you think that Katie Hopkins relies on state assistance for the medication and treatment of her epilepsy?”
She did not say that the state should not be contributing. She said If people have the money (like K Price with her millions) shouldn't they be paying rather than claiming from the state (I expect by consequence the state would have more to give to those without).
Fair question and an opinion but katie Price can do what she likes with her millions. If she is entitled to claim something for free, then it is her choice. She can listen to Hopkins opinion but can equally dismiss and ignore it.
If K Hopkins goes privately then she is saving the NHS a money. This is a good thing??