• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Is Cami a sex pest?
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
Enidan
26-01-2015
She seems to be sexualy harrassing Calum and there's nothing the poor guy can do.
revolver44
26-01-2015
More like a STD in human form
Oracles_eye
26-01-2015
Why isn't she being removed and cautioned.
johnny_dole
26-01-2015
not sure i see callum complaining
cavalli
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by revolver44:
“More like a STD in human form”

A walking yeast infection
amyawake
26-01-2015
I think he is a bit embarassed to be saddled with her now. Yes she has the looks but, when he first saw her in overdrive re. the lesbo suggestion, you could tell he had reassessed her.
Enidan
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by Oracles_eye:
“Why isn't she being removed and cautioned.”

I agree. I haven't seen any indication that he is enjoying or encouraging her touching him constantly. It's uncomfortable viewing.
pompeybird
26-01-2015
Dunno about sex pest but i reckon if that bunny was still in there she would be boiling it
Stellen11
26-01-2015
Calum really doesnt seem to mind.
Enidan
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by johnny_dole:
“not sure i see callum complaining”

He is being polite and doesn't seem to want to upset her, but it's obvious he's not enjoying it.
eva_prior
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by Enidan:
“She seems to be sexualy harrassing Calum and there's nothing the poor guy can do.”

Nah, until tonight's rebuff, Callum's encouraged and reciprocated sex pesting with her.

So clearly, they are two sex pests sex pesting each other.

A perfect match IMO.
amyawake
26-01-2015
Originally Posted by Enidan:
“He is being polite and doesn't seem to want to upset her, but it's obvious he's not enjoying it.”

Yes I agree. He has too much class to kick up a fuss in public. Also it could be he is wondering how his girlfriend might be viewing all this.
Rufus Knights
26-01-2015
This is Calum Best we're talking about. He loves the attention and actively encourages it.
revolver44
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by amyawake:
“I think he is a bit embarassed to be saddled with her now. Yes she has the massive fake tits but, when he first saw her in overdrive re. the lesbo suggestion, you could tell he had reassessed her.”

Fixed your post
Bunions
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by Enidan:
“I agree. I haven't seen any indication that he is enjoying or encouraging her touching him constantly. It's uncomfortable viewing.”

He isn't.

She's been 'friendzoned' which is something she's probably not accustomed to...........hence the appearance of the nekkid mammary earlier
JVS
27-01-2015
At least she's giving the bland, humourless Callum some air time. She's not a sex-pest but her ex, Norcross, most certainly is.
king_kong1
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by Enidan:
“She seems to be sexualy harrassing Calum and there's nothing the poor guy can do.”

I wouldn't complain.
Oracles_eye
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by eva_prior:
“Nah, until tonight's rebuff, Callum's encouraged and reciprocated sex pesting with her.

So clearly, they are two sex pests sex pesting each other.

A perfect match IMO.”

Doesn't matter if he offered her sex for ten years, if he feels uncomfortable at that moment then that's his choice, he isn't a piece of meat,
hendoll
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by JVS:
“At least she's giving the bland, humourless Callum some air time. She's not a sex-pest but her ex, Norcross, most certainly is.”

Got to agree with this. He is really starting to irritate me now. Not only bland and humourless but getting smug too. Not an attractive combination. I can't speak about Cami because I will end up saying something too nasty
eva_prior
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by Oracles_eye:
“Doesn't matter if he offered her sex for ten years, if he feels uncomfortable at that moment then that's his choice, he isn't a piece of meat,”

If she had persisted following his rejection, then that tag could rightly be applied.

However, as previously they have been physical flirt-budz, she basically just went in for the usual, but upped her game. He could have responded positively as per.

So on the basis of their exchanges to date, she is not a sex pest.
Oracles_eye
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by eva_prior:
“If she had persisted following his rejection, then that tag could rightly be applied.

However, as previously they have been physical flirt-budz, she basically just went in for the usual, but upped her game. He could have responded positively as per.”

Ahh so when Jeremy stopped and was booted out and cautioned it's because of wait... Why was he thrown out and cautioned again, he stopped..... Ahhh I get it now.
eva_prior
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by Oracles_eye:
“Ahh so when Jeremy stopped and was booted out and cautioned it's because of wait... Why was he thrown out and cautioned again, he stopped..... Ahhh I get it now.”

Invalid comparison.

Cami and Callum have previously been physically flirting and cuddling. During one of their sessions, Callum held her close to him with her face almost in his crotch. So they have already indicated to each other that they are allowed to invade each other's personal space.
On this occasion, she did not continue when he showed lack of interest in engaging in same today.
Similar to an established couple's interaction, whereby one checks out if the other wants to make love, but the other person isn't interested on a given occasion. If the interested person persists on that occasion, then they can rightly be tagged as a sex pest or much worse. Otherwise - No.

Jeremy and Chloe did not have an established physical flirting relationship prior to the incident. Their personal space boundaries wrt each other were therefore the same as two strangers. So clearly an (uninvited) invasion into Chloe's personal space towards her erogenous zones was a totally different scenario to Cami and Callum.
kattymieoww
27-01-2015
She's a skank...
Oracles_eye
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by eva_prior:
“Invalid comparison.

Cami and Callum have previously been physically flirting and cuddling. On this occasion, she did not continue when he showed lack of interest in engaging in same today. So they have already indicated to each other that they are allowed to invade each other's personal space.
Similar to an established couple's interaction, whereby one checks out if the other wants to make love, but the other person isn't interested on a given occasion. If the interested person persists on that occasion, then they can rightly be tagged as a sex pest or much worse. Otherwise - No.

Jeremy and Chloe did not have an established physical flirting relationship prior to the incident. Their personal space boundaries wrt each other were therefore the same as two strangers. So clearly an (uninvited) invasion into Chloe's personal space towards her erogenous zones was a totally different scenario to Cami and Callum.”

Presuming actions is where it lies, there are no boundaries, if Callum had stood up screaming and saying what the hell was she doing, it would matter.

So you are basically saying callum asked for it and got what he deserved....

Brilliant, case closed.

A little side note, a couple have been in a relationship for years, one comes home drunk and whilst the other is sleeping engages in sexual intercourse without consent the person wakes and reports the matter to the authority....


Or one wakes in the night and performs a sexual act...

Where do I stand in law...
WhatJoeThinks
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by revolver44:
“Fixed your post ”

Naughty.
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map