Originally Posted by king_kong1:
“No and no. Should always be in secret in the DR and never allowed to be discussed.”
Originally Posted by Pete_Lashmar:
“But why do you feel that's better than the alternatives?”
I agree with king-kong (LOL doesn't a forum make you write weird lines?

)
I am happy to explain why I think secret diary room noms with no nom talk are preferable.
With f2f it seems to me there are just two possible outcomes. Either the nominated party will take it on the chin, using a variety of guises " I expected it" "I want to go anyway" etc. Or they will meet the nominee head on, it all kicks off, big row etc.
The other issue is that I feel when called upon to nominate F2F many HMs choose political reasons. I think as viewers we get more insight into what is happening in the house if HMs are confident that their noms will not be revealed because they are less guarded about their reasons.
In-secret noms give many more variables in terms of reactions. The nominated party is left guessing who it is that doesn't like them and why. There is so much scope for them to make an error about who selected them. They have no idea even how many selected them - Do all HMS want me gone or is it just a couple of them.
They may have suspicions but they can't really act on those suspicions because they are not certain. Nevertheless some do go off on one based on suspicion or let their suspicions change their interaction with others. Sometimes they do this and are quite wrong - that's quite funny.
All the guessing and second guessing has a subtle but fascinating impact on the dynamics within the house. Its more likely to produce a slow burn than a big flash.