As viewers the majority of us find both or either of them entertaining or annoying ..

However if you asked me which one id rather live in a confined space with .. hands down it would be Katie H at least when she says something i don't agree with i can walk away and not listen , but Perez childish annoying antics for example dry humping the bedroom window - putting cheese up his nose - blowing kisses at Alexander.. i could not live with that . Lets not forget this man is 36 years old and is a father.

Perez all the way!
The Hopkins woman is just very nasty, Perez is far more entertaining.

Katie H by far...in all honesty I don't see her being nasty any more than anyone else has been. Most of the vitriol in this forum is based from prior to the series and that's fine if people look at it like that. I don't tend to bring something into the past unless there is a huge disparity put forward by that HM.

I'm rooting for Katie H for the win!

Katie H. I can't even put them in the same category. I sometimes like Katie H, mostly for her way with words, sometimes not, for her childish taunting. But I loathe every second that Perez is on the screen! detest every single thing about him and wish he had never set foot in the BB house, he's totally ruined this series for me. I can only assume BB paid him mega bucks which is why they want their money's worth out of him by ensuring he's in to the bitter end.

xx

THIS ^^^

Katie H to win for me

The difference between Perez and Hopkins is that unless you and Perez have a falling out, he's actually a fairly nice funny guy and you'll get along fine. Hopkins would orchestrate a debate deliberately and if you disagreed with her you'd be terrorised.

Both, when he "left" last night the rest of the show fell flat on its arse.

Perez.......for giving me so much entertainment

I despise Perez, but that doesn't automatically mean I want Katie H to win. But it wouldn't bother me if she did . . . . . .

xx

Katie H for sure.

I'd have been kicked out of the house a long time ago because of Perez.

Perez. I don't even think she is as intelligent or cogent as she imagines she is. Plus he has had a more interesting life, and as he likes talking about himself, it would be fasciunating to ask him about what he;s done and where he's been. Whereas she is just a failed Apprentice candidate who had a second life as an internet troll. Also she seems deeply nasty, to me - not just right wing and with a closed mind, but very keen on forcing her opinions on people, bullying and isolating tactics are very ugly to watch. A fundamental vileness about her facial expressions, the way she talks - would drive me nuts. I'd rather watch Perez humping furniture.

Perez

Perez. He's annoying but not nasty. Katie Hopkins knows she's being offensive but just carries on regardless. Often she has no real argument in her favour but thinks putting on a superior or puzzled look makes her intelligent.

I'm afraid I am one of those magnolia people who don't like either of them

but If I had to choose between the lesser of two evils, I would go for Perez as he's running rings around Katie H

Great post. I agree. I'd add, however, that I find Perez is a master of the clever retorts - he's very quick-witted and creative in his thinking. Some of the things he comes out with are priceless. Katie Hopkins hasn't the wit or the imagination to do the same. She can only reiterate bland stock-phrases, hence her inability to engage in any meaningful discussion and her practice of resorting to unrelated insults if she's unable to dominate a discussion through sheer volume and repetition.

Perez for me. I can't stand Hopkins - reminds me of a bitchy teenage girl with her gang around her. Horrible person and nothing she has done in there has made me change my opinion of her.

I've seen Jam turn faster!

I don't understand how anyone can like either of them or find anything they do entertaining. They are both thick as shit as well.