|
||||||||
Did Nadia pull in more votes than Katie Hopkins? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,808
|
Did Nadia pull in more votes than Katie Hopkins?
I just rewatched the eviction announcement and Emma did not say "in no particular order" before she announced that nadia was safe followed by Katie H. Mistake on emma's part or did Nadia pull in more votes than Hopkins?
Re-watch it yourself if you don't believe me. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: On the Fence With Rachel Rice
Posts: 6,314
|
That's what i thought. If so, awesome!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,661
|
If this is true my faith in the GBP will slowly return
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lincs
Posts: 16,173
|
Dunno but Nadia has been in the safest two for the past two evictions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,808
|
Here's what she said exactly:
"Since yesterday, the British public have been voting to save. I can now reveal the two housemates with the most votes and therefore safe from eviction are...Nadia...and...Katie Hopkins" No "in no particular order" anywhere in her announcement. She didn't say it tonight before this sentence either. interesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: London
Posts: 9,192
|
It was in no particular order.
It's highly unlikely she got more votes than Hopkins. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,808
|
Quote:
It was in no particular order.
It's highly unlikely she got more votes than Hopkins. So how come it wasn't announced this time? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,491
|
Maybe the Guardian organised a pro-Nadia campaign calling out to the loony leftie Labour voters
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,048
|
It wouldn't surprise me considering how the other Loose Women did...and they were even more awful than Nadia for the most part.
If Perez hadn't been a noose around her neck since the start then she likely would have been a clear winner. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,804
|
Quote:
It was in no particular order.
It's highly unlikely she got more votes than Hopkins. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: London
Posts: 9,192
|
Quote:
Here's what she said exactly:
"Since yesterday, the British public have been voting to save. I can now reveal the two housemates with the most votes and therefore safe from eviction are...Nadia...and...Katie Hopkins" No "in no particular order" anywhere in her announcement. She didn't say it before this sentence either. interesting ![]() She said the two HM's with the most votes, that doesn't say whether it's in order or not. Keep dreaming Nadia fans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,808
|
Quote:
She didn't say with the most votes is Nadia...and so on.
She said the two HM's with the most votes, that doesn't say whether it's in order or not. Keep dreaming Nadia fans. ![]() She did not say "in no particular order" so you cannot say that it was in no particular order. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: London
Posts: 9,192
|
Quote:
Why because YOU said so
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,808
|
Quote:
Well no, not because I say so....because all the BB online polls and bookies say so.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 40
|
Katie Hopkins' fans are just jealous because Nadia was first and now the are trying to make excuses this is amazing, tables are turning people, tables are turning and it's so funny!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: London
Posts: 9,192
|
Quote:
I'm not a nadia fan...
She did not say "in no particular order" so you cannot say that it was in no particular order. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,804
|
Quote:
Well no, not because I say so....because all the BB online polls and bookies say so.
![]() Bookies change their odds on Katie H almost daily. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 690
|
Quote:
If this is true my faith in the GBP will slowly return
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lincs
Posts: 16,173
|
Quote:
Well no, not because I say so....because all the BB online polls and bookies say so.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: On the Fence With Rachel Rice
Posts: 6,314
|
Quote:
She didn't say with the most votes is Nadia...and so on.
She said the two HM's with the most votes, that doesn't say whether it's in order or not. Keep dreaming Nadia fans. ![]() She was at the top when Perez was also up, without Perez in the mix maybe Perez supporters threw votes her way. Patsy was a difficult one to support because she wasn't contributing much and was so miserable, and so if you weren't on Katie H/Cami's side the votes would probably go to Nadia. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bradford
Posts: 4,006
|
Would there be any point saying "in no particular order " when its only the top two vote gainers being called safe? Dosent make much sense. Either way it's in the correct order or reverse order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,752
|
I'd like to think that the balance of power is shifting.
Because Alicia leaving and then Patsy didn't look promising as they were both more aligned with Perez and Nadia. But I'd be happy to see things turn more in their favour now. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:17.

