• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Did Nadia pull in more votes than Katie Hopkins?
Fanntastik
27-01-2015
I just rewatched the eviction announcement and Emma did not say "in no particular order" before she announced that nadia was safe followed by Katie H. Mistake on emma's part or did Nadia pull in more votes than Hopkins?

Re-watch it yourself if you don't believe me.
onfencewithrach
27-01-2015
That's what i thought. If so, awesome!
postit
27-01-2015
If this is true my faith in the GBP will slowly return
Fanntastik
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by onfencewithrach:
“That's what i thought. If so, awesome!”

agreed.
SnowStorm86
27-01-2015
Dunno but Nadia has been in the safest two for the past two evictions.
Fanntastik
27-01-2015
Here's what she said exactly:

"Since yesterday, the British public have been voting to save. I can now reveal the two housemates with the most votes and therefore safe from eviction are...Nadia...and...Katie Hopkins"

No "in no particular order" anywhere in her announcement. She didn't say it tonight before this sentence either. interesting
Captain Kipper
27-01-2015
It was in no particular order.

It's highly unlikely she got more votes than Hopkins.
Fanntastik
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by Captain Kipper:
“It was in no particular order.

It's highly unlikely she got more votes than Hopkins.”

But every eviction that is in no particular order, it's announced that it's in no particular order.

So how come it wasn't announced this time?
dtorre
27-01-2015
Maybe the Guardian organised a pro-Nadia campaign calling out to the loony leftie Labour voters
Callous
27-01-2015
It wouldn't surprise me considering how the other Loose Women did...and they were even more awful than Nadia for the most part.

If Perez hadn't been a noose around her neck since the start then she likely would have been a clear winner.
Luner13
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by Captain Kipper:
“It was in no particular order.

It's highly unlikely she got more votes than Hopkins.”

Why because YOU said so
Captain Kipper
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by Fanntastik:
“Here's what she said exactly:

"Since yesterday, the British public have been voting to save. I can now reveal the two housemates with the most votes and therefore safe from eviction are...Nadia...and...Katie Hopkins"

No "in no particular order" anywhere in her announcement. She didn't say it before this sentence either. interesting ”

She didn't say with the most votes is Nadia...and so on.

She said the two HM's with the most votes, that doesn't say whether it's in order or not.

Keep dreaming Nadia fans.
Fanntastik
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by Captain Kipper:
“She didn't say with the most votes is Nadia...and so on.

She said the two HM's with the most votes, that doesn't say whether it's in order or not.

Keep dreaming Nadia fans. ”

I'm not a nadia fan...

She did not say "in no particular order" so you cannot say that it was in no particular order.
Captain Kipper
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by Luner13:
“Why because YOU said so”

Well no, not because I say so....because all the BB online polls and bookies say so.
Fanntastik
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by Captain Kipper:
“Well no, not because I say so....because all the BB online polls and bookies say so. ”

the same polls and bookies that had Cami Li as fave to go?
BettyFinn
27-01-2015
Katie Hopkins' fans are just jealous because Nadia was first and now the are trying to make excuses this is amazing, tables are turning people, tables are turning and it's so funny!
Captain Kipper
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by Fanntastik:
“I'm not a nadia fan...

She did not say "in no particular order" so you cannot say that it was in no particular order.”

And no one can say it was in order....Emma said "the two HM's with the most votes are"
Luner13
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by Captain Kipper:
“Well no, not because I say so....because all the BB online polls and bookies say so. ”

You do realise this show gets almost 3 million viewers? online polls do not represent the big picture my dear.

Bookies change their odds on Katie H almost daily.
HelenH
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by postit:
“If this is true my faith in the GBP will slowly return”

Me too, I so hope Nadia is getting the most votes
SnowStorm86
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by Captain Kipper:
“Well no, not because I say so....because all the BB online polls and bookies say so. ”

Would that be the same bookies and polls that said Nadia would be evicted last Friday?
onfencewithrach
27-01-2015
Originally Posted by Captain Kipper:
“She didn't say with the most votes is Nadia...and so on.

She said the two HM's with the most votes, that doesn't say whether it's in order or not.

Keep dreaming Nadia fans. ”

It's not impossible.

She was at the top when Perez was also up, without Perez in the mix maybe Perez supporters threw votes her way. Patsy was a difficult one to support because she wasn't contributing much and was so miserable, and so if you weren't on Katie H/Cami's side the votes would probably go to Nadia.
GREATGUY
27-01-2015
Would there be any point saying "in no particular order " when its only the top two vote gainers being called safe? Dosent make much sense. Either way it's in the correct order or reverse order.
Alrightmate
28-01-2015
I'd like to think that the balance of power is shifting.
Because Alicia leaving and then Patsy didn't look promising as they were both more aligned with Perez and Nadia.
But I'd be happy to see things turn more in their favour now.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map