♪ Come with me and you'll be in a world of pure imagination...♪
Would love it though
Would love it though
Nadia and Perez Final Two!
2 of 2
Originally Posted by Master Ozzy:
“I would love to see this!!”
“I would love to see this!!”
Never thought I'd say it but, me too. I couldn't bear either of them at the start but now much prefer them to most of the others. I love Cheggers but he hasn't really done much to entertain me.
Originally Posted by OMGItsAnnie:
“Couldn't think of anything worse.”
“Couldn't think of anything worse.”
I agree it would be awful if they were the Final 2 .
of course they will, everyone would have walked out of the house before the final.
only two standing.
only two standing.
Originally Posted by Rufus Knights:
“Two vile human beings, No thank you.”
“Two vile human beings, No thank you.”
This!
Seriously, I would never watch the show again if this happened. Nadia? Final?? NO WAY!
Originally Posted by Master Ozzy:
“I would love to see this!!”
“I would love to see this!!”
Yes, the last two standing, that would be fine by me, but I would prefer NADIA and Cheggers I think! As long as Hopkins doesn't win then that's just fine by me!
Originally Posted by MaryHartman2:
“I somehow think it'll be Nadia, Perez and Katie in the Top3.”
“I somehow think it'll be Nadia, Perez and Katie in the Top3.”
Well they are the top 3 at the moment!
I have to say that the likes of Cheggers and Calum Best and most of the others have been disappointing!
NADIA is by far my winner!
Originally Posted by Rufus Knights:
“Two vile human beings, No thank you.”
“Two vile human beings, No thank you.”
How ironic that you call these two vile when you support Hopkins and supported HELEN last year. Quite laughable really isn't it! Two of the most vile women we have ever had on BB!!!!!!
This'd be great! Honestly though I'd have anyone but Hopkins or Cami in the final 2 - they just define 'vile'.
Originally Posted by Darcyprincess:
“How ironic that you call these two vile when you support Hopkins and supported HELEN last year. Quite laughable really isn't it! Two of the most vile women we have ever had on BB!!!!!!”
“How ironic that you call these two vile when you support Hopkins and supported HELEN last year. Quite laughable really isn't it! Two of the most vile women we have ever had on BB!!!!!!”
Clearly the public disagree with you because Helen was crowned winner and Hopkins is a big fav to win. Hopkins has received huge cheers so far and both Nadia and Perez have been booed.
Originally Posted by Rufus Knights:
“She is so interfering, controlling and a total busybody. She constantly tries to take the moral high ground and seems to be offended by everything, unless of course, it's Perez who is doing it. She totally turns a blind eye to Perez's appalling behaviour. In fact, she has supported and enabled him as he's terrorised that house. I think she is extremely unpleasant.”
“She is so interfering, controlling and a total busybody. She constantly tries to take the moral high ground and seems to be offended by everything, unless of course, it's Perez who is doing it. She totally turns a blind eye to Perez's appalling behaviour. In fact, she has supported and enabled him as he's terrorised that house. I think she is extremely unpleasant.”
Agreed, you've given a spot on description of her.
Originally Posted by Rufus Knights:
“She is so interfering, controlling and a total busybody. She constantly tries to take the moral high ground and seems to be offended by everything, unless of course, it's Perez who is doing it. She totally turns a blind eye to Perez's appalling behaviour. In fact, she has supported and enabled him as he's terrorised that house. I think she is extremely unpleasant.”
“She is so interfering, controlling and a total busybody. She constantly tries to take the moral high ground and seems to be offended by everything, unless of course, it's Perez who is doing it. She totally turns a blind eye to Perez's appalling behaviour. In fact, she has supported and enabled him as he's terrorised that house. I think she is extremely unpleasant.”
Could not agree more well said
2 of 2
