I'm fat and unemployed... nope still don't like her
Why are Working Class People supporting Hopkins?
4 of 4
Because we have a sense of humour and we have been impressed with the way she has conducted herself in the house. Most of her comments are tongue in cheek and are not meant to be taken literally.
The uber offended (like Nadia) will always jump onto her comments and show their faux outrage. A classic example was her comment ''at least it's a job''. Clearly it was a joke and most people in the bedroom were laughing but busybody Nadia of course had to show her faux outrage.
I think many have also been impressed with the way Katie has stood up to Perez who has terrorised that house.
The uber offended (like Nadia) will always jump onto her comments and show their faux outrage. A classic example was her comment ''at least it's a job''. Clearly it was a joke and most people in the bedroom were laughing but busybody Nadia of course had to show her faux outrage.
I think many have also been impressed with the way Katie has stood up to Perez who has terrorised that house.
Originally Posted by Rufus Knights:
“Because we have a sense of humour and we have been impressed with the way she has conducted herself in the house. Most of her comments are tongue in cheek and are not meant to be taken literally.
The uber offended (like Nadia) will always jump onto her comments and show their faux outrage. A classic example was comment ''at least it's a job''. Clearly it was a joke and most people in the bedroom were laughing but busybody Nadia of course had to show her faux outrage.”
“Because we have a sense of humour and we have been impressed with the way she has conducted herself in the house. Most of her comments are tongue in cheek and are not meant to be taken literally.
The uber offended (like Nadia) will always jump onto her comments and show their faux outrage. A classic example was comment ''at least it's a job''. Clearly it was a joke and most people in the bedroom were laughing but busybody Nadia of course had to show her faux outrage.”
Well that feeds beautifully into what I just posted.
The child is in the sweatshop and is categorically low. This kind of system is allowed to continue because the high, and middle, like Katie, will make jokes about it and insist it's funny and the brow-beaten low will say 'Oh, OK, if high says it's funny - it's funny'; paying no mind to the system that is keeping them down and 'funny' middle's complicity in same.
4 of 4
